Pancham1

Welcome!

Hello, Pancham1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Aasim 17:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aasim 17:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurukul Vrindavan, Mathura UP (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheImaCow was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurukul Vrindavan, Mathura UP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gurukul Vrindavan, Mathura UP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 08:20, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Pancham1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 08:20, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Pancham1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi Pancham1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Formatting, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurukul Vrindavan, Mathura UP (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gurukul Vrindavan, Mathura UP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gurukul Vrindavan, Mathura UP, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani

Hi. I see you have submitted this draft for review through articles for creation. I have to say, although I declined to speedy delete that draft last week, it will not be accepted by AFC in its current state. It is NOT ready. I see you've also had another draft declined.

The main problem, both with the other draft AFC declined and with this one, is you are not properly citing your sources. A good rule of thumb is that every fact in a Wikipedia article should have a citation to a reliable source. Most of the time, the citations use footnotes that go in a reference section, but some people prefer parenthetical references, and those are ok. Please take a look at referencing for beginners to learn how to do it.

In addition to the lack of sourcing, Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani also falls into a few other traps common to first-time Wikipedia writers. It is excessively detailed (why is it important that the reader know that 8 year old Vishveshwar ate a breakfast of "lentils roti and vegetables" around 9 a.m. before beginning his day's schooling?), it uses excessively flattering language to describe the subjects' accomplishments (known in Wikipedia as peacock words), and it is generally difficult to read and follow.

I have tried to help with formatting; proper formatting helps a reader follow the article, but improper formatting is not a deal breaker for AFC as it is easy for experienced editors to fix. However, what I cannot fix is the content and referencing issues. I do not know about Vishveshwar, I do not have books about him, I can see on the internet where there are books and articles about him, much of which is in a language I do not know. I would like to help you with these articles, but you will need to supply the content and tell me where what information comes from.

Let me know what questions you have and how I can help you. You can do that by replying here, on your talk page. I'll be watching it. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 19:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your helpful feedback. The reason i was sharing about his daily routine was to show what a simple and austere life he lived. I can delete those details and attempt to make it crisp and objective. Can i Please have a biography template.  If i write it as an objective biography . Will work on it this weekend and share with you again here. So he is a a great Hindi and Sanskrit scholar how do i make him more appealing. Not all his publishers are online, maybe you can also help and guide me as to how i can add more reliability as required by Wiki editors. Also i was trying to create another article on Gurukul Vrindavan, whihc also got denied for lack of reliable sources, how do i fix that. lastly why does the article read Draft Acharya Vishwveshwar and not just Acharya Vishveshwar? Thanks again for your help

I'm glad my feedback was helpful. Crisp and objective is definitely the way you want to go.

Regarding a biography template; I don't think we have a template as such. The Manual of Style has a section on biographies, not all of which will apply to every article, but you should probably at least look at the part on the lead section and order of events part, and skim the rest. There's also a simplified list of dos and don'ts for biographies. Wikiproject Biography also has some helpful advice on their pages. However, probably the best way to get feel for how the material should be presented is to read some Featured articles and Good articles that are biographies, such as Mahatma Gandhi, Barthélemy Boganda, Jomo Kenyatta, or John Calvin.

You mentioned that not all his publishers are online - that is ok. Things don't have to be online. Often, the best sources for articles aren't online - its just that online sources are easy, but that doesn't make them good. Making sure the article cites reliable sources means that for every (or nearly every) fact in the article, you tell the reader where you learned that fact, and give them enough information that it is theoretically possible for them to look at the same source you looked at and verify that it does say what you say it says. So, if you have a book, and the book is old and not online, you put information like the author's name, the title of the book, the year it was published, the publisher's name, and the page number. Like this: Doe, John (1972). Title of Hypothetical Book. London: Hypothetical Publishing House. p. 54.. You can do the same for newspaper articles, magazine articles, scholarly journals, etc. Also, reliable sources are sources that talk about him, not books written by him. It seems he has written several books, and you do want to discuss those in the article as it's part of what makes him important, but they are not sources about him, which is what you need.

Lastly, it's at Draft: Acharya Vishwveshwar instead of just Acharya Vishwveshwar because it's still a draft; it's not yet up to snuff to be accepted into the encyclopedia. Once most of the issues we're talking about are fixed, it can be moved out of draft space. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 21:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 21:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gurukul Vrindavan, Mathura UP

Hello, Pancham1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gurukul Vrindavan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani

Hello, Pancham1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Acharya Vishveshwar, Siddhant Shiromani

Hello, Pancham1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Acharya Vishveshwar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)