Page graham
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:IMG 0545.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:IMG 0545.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Masonmuncie.jpg
edit Thanks for uploading File:Masonmuncie.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:IMG 0538.jpg
edit Thanks for uploading File:IMG 0538.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:49, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome
edit
|
Welcome to Wikipedia! I serve the Wikipedia community as an Online Ambassador, working with university students throughout the United States. Unfortunately, there are some concerns with the edits that have been made to the above linked article. Specifically:
- the article does not comply with Wikipedia's guidelines for historical places that have been placed on the National Register. A review of the style guidelines will be helpful. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions.
- Notability is established through significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Unfortunately, there are concerns with the reliability and independence of the sources used to support the subject. We cannot use the google site for a reference, due to lack of reliability. We can use the cornerstonearts.org site, but since it is a primary reference, we cannot use it to establish notability. The Ball Memoirs citation needs to be reformatted as a full citation, which includes title, author, publisher, date of publication, ISBN, and page number cited. Lacking prose, we cannot use the picasaweb.google.com site to verify content in the article. Since the Muncie Sunday Star article or content is unverifiable, can you provide any other sources to verify the content?
- Most importantly, we need to resolve the licensing issues for the images used in the article. Lacking appropriate licensing and copyright verification, the use of the images represents a violation of copyright law. If you are the copyright holder, please let me know, and I will assist you with supplying verification of ownership to the Wikimedia Foundation.
I have added some maintenance templates to the article, indicating those areas that need attention. Generally, editors would simply make the revisions, rather than placing the tags. However, since this is part of the college curriculum, I am offering assistance and guidance in the development of the article, along with any article creation that you may wish to start. I am happy to provide direction with the article in any regard. Feel free to contact me here, on my talk page, or through email, if you need assistance or have any questions. Best regards, Cind.amuse 18:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)