May 2019

edit

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 10:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wars involving North macedonia

edit

I recently added the invasion of Yugoslavia as well as war in Yugoslavia during WW2 as Macedonian Partisans fought during this time,however it was taken down because I was only allowed to add wars after the country became independent.However is it possible to change it so it's like the "List of wars involving Croatia" page where it states that the page is about wars fought by Croatia or Croatian people.This I hope would allow for my additions to be kept.Thank you.

@Future Perfect at Sunrise:


PT22 (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

The scope of these pages is often defined in problematic and inconsistent ways, and I don't think the Croatia page is a model to follow here. I'm also quite skeptical about including wars fought by "the Croatian people" (whatever that is supposed to mean) in that case, but I'm not going to try and fix the whole lot of these pages. In the Croatia case, at least, Croatia existed as a state (a kingdom) for a considerable while in pre-modern times, so there might be a case for extending the scope back to those periods. With Macedonia that's clearly not the case; the first time "Macedonia" existed as a potential political agent was after 1945. Fut.Perf. 06:24, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, but Unity is Strength (Australia) was basically the same as the deleted article

edit

So I've deleted it again. Doug Weller talk 07:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sons of Australia moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Sons of Australia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 09:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sons of Australia

edit

  Hello, PT22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sons of Australia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply