October 2008 edit

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to New Found Glory, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 17:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Fall Out Boy, you will be blocked from editing. — ŁittleÄlien¹8² (talk\contribs) 17:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Juraj Kuráň edit

 

A tag has been placed on Juraj Kuráň requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 15:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jan Králik edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jan Králik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 15:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jakub Sylvestr edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jakub Sylvestr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 15:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Tomáš Mojský edit

 

A tag has been placed on Tomáš Mojský requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 15:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Peter Černák edit

 

A tag has been placed on Peter Černák requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 15:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Jozef Fillo" edit

 

A page you created, Jozef Fillo, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Bremerenator (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Jan Králik edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jan Králik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:41, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Ivan Kmotrík edit

 

A tag has been placed on Ivan Kmotrík requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 10:50, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Slovak footballers edit

Please improve your articles about Slovak footballers: add categories, infobox etc... so that they would get a wider audience and not be deleted. Think that quality is better than quantity.Cheers.--Latouffedisco (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seems you can't understand what I said. I will not improve all your stubs like I did for Ludovit Cvetler. Consider that most of your articles will be deleted if they remain that way. Moreover, you can be blocked for that. Think about that...--Latouffedisco (talk) 12:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I was gonna say that threatening a block seems a little harsh, but you've re-created several articles without addressing the concerns raised when they were deleted, so it may actually have been warranted. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm glad to see you made some progress. Keep up the good work!--Latouffedisco (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Articles about Slovak footballers edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you have created many articles about Slovak footballers and I appreciate your efforts to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Slovak football. However, in order to make sure these articles are not deleted, all articles should assert notability for the footballer (such as playing in a fully professional league or for a senior national football team). Please try and add sources for this such as links to fotbal.cz or national-football-teams.com or idnes.cz. Also, it is helpful to add infoboxes and categories to the article (especially Category:Slovak footballers) to help users find the articles. You may want to look at the changes I made to Ľubomír Luhový for an idea of what to do. Please let me know if you have questions. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Panic at the Disco, you will be blocked from editing. Timmeh! 16:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

Justin Javorek edit

 

A tag has been placed on Justin Javorek, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

It seems that you have created quite a number of these very small articles. Rather than simply adding more, please consider expanding what you've already created. Simply stating that "so-and-so is a footballer" is insufficient content. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to My Chemical Romance, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Timmeh! 23:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2009 edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Genres edit

Please stop capitalizing genres. They are not proper nouns and should not be capitalized per WP:MOS. Timmeh! 14:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Genres edit

Hi, please could you desist in adding genres to band articles that do not have sources and/or a supportive consensus. If you do not support your changes with reliable sources it violates our neutral point of view and original research policies. If you require any assistance, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks and regards, ScarianCall me Pat! 17:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:1079540909 bicik-david.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:1079540909 bicik-david.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Miroslav Mentel edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Miroslav Mentel. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Dušan Perniš.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Dušan Perniš.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.teamtalk.com/football/story/0,16368,1865_5564964,00.html. As a copyright violation, File:Dušan Perniš.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Dušan Perniš.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is really inapprehensible that you continue your rotten behaviour from Commons here on Wikipedia, all this wrong claims of authorship! See commons:User talk:Gazela and the sockpuppets you use. --Martin H. (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

And so it continues. All your uploads are copyright violations. I have 0 understanding for people acting like you here. Please finally read the instructions. --Martin H. (talk) 16:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

October 2009 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruption caused by consistently violating and ignoring warnings about copyright and image upload policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nja247 09:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello PALIO10! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 20 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Peter Rusina - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Peter Struhár - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Martin Cseh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Dominik Rodinger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Peter Štepanovský - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Jozef Obert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Tomáš Stúpala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Peter Černák - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Jan Králík - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Michal Breznaník - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Erik Čikoš edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Erik Čikoš. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Filip Kiss edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Filip Kiss. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tomáš Bagi edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Tomáš Bagi. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tomáš Bagi edit

 

The article Tomáš Bagi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Tomáš Bagi edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Tomáš Bagi. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Tomáš Bagi edit

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tomáš Bagi. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomáš Bagi. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

[[deleted previously perWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomáš Bagi

Speedy deletion edit

Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting.
For basic information on beginning to write an article see User:Dloh/new.
Sourcing is incredibly important for an encyclopedia. Be sure to list your sources at the bottom of the article.
For more general information about the deletion process, please see User:Dlohcierekim/deletion
If you believe the subject does in fact meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information, please contact me on my talk page.
Other helpful pages are--
If you wish to make test edits or work on the article before creating it, you can create a test page at User:PALIO10/sandbox and consider using the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 21:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin Cseh edit

 

A tag has been placed on Martin Cseh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Nath1991 (talk) 04:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Csaba Kovacs edit

 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Csaba Kovacs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Lionel (talk) 02:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ján Nemček edit

 

The article Ján Nemček has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 02:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Peter Gábriš edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Peter Gábriš. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Peter Gábriš edit

 

The article Peter Gábriš has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 00:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010 edit

  Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Slovakia national football team worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Bocafan76 (talk) 12:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the tables that you have added to the Slovakia national football team article are not standard or agree upon by consensus to be used in National football team articles, if you don't like the current standard you are welcome to open a discussion about changing it on WT:FOOTY. Regards --Bocafan76 (talk) 12:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Martin Uher edit

 

The article Martin Uher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information is unverifiable (the only "Martin Uher" with significant coverage in external sources is a transportation company) and there is no evidence this footballer would satisfy any of the notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miroslav Svoboda edit

 

The article Miroslav Svoboda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EchetusXe 01:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ivan Galád edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ivan Galád. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Jendrišek, Hološko edit

Prestaň už prepisovať počet zápasov. Tu máš presné štatistiky [1]. Kajman87 (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC+1)

Proposed deletion of Ivan Galád edit

 

The article Ivan Galád has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Logan Talk Contributions 05:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Miroslav Klose, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Repost of Tomáš Bagi edit

  A tag has been placed on Tomáš Bagi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:   which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Slovakia squad - 2003 FIFA U-20 World Cup edit

 

The article Slovakia squad - 2003 FIFA U-20 World Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Should be made as a template.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Template:ŠK Slovan Bratislava Squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Musical artist infobox names edit

Hello. Please do not replace names in the infobox with logos - see Template:Infobox_musical_artist#name. Thanks.--Michig (talk) 21:14, 16 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lukáš Hutta edit

 

The article Lukáš Hutta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:44, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ivan Kmotrík edit

 

The article Ivan Kmotrík has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable businessperson. No indication of meeting WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Martin Vrablec edit

 

The article Martin Vrablec has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Peter Gábriš edit

 

The article Peter Gábriš has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tomáš Mojský edit

 

The article Tomáš Mojský has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:New logo of SFZ.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:New logo of SFZ.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Slovakia squad 2003 FIFA World Youth Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C679 07:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Global account edit

Hi PALIO10! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:13, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, PALIO10. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, PALIO10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, PALIO10. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Hungary–Slovakia football rivalry edit

Hello, PALIO10,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Hungary–Slovakia football rivalry should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary–Slovakia football rivalry.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:22, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jozef Žigárdy for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jozef Žigárdy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jozef Žigárdy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Joeykai (talk) 21:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply