June 2022 edit

 

Hello Operator24601. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Safi Rauf, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Operator24601. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Operator24601|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you for the note, I am not financially compensated for the edits made. The edits made are all in the original article. I don't like the original language, it is not very well written. Thank you for the message. Operator24601 (talk) 00:57, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Operator24601. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

It is clear you at least have a COI so you need COIDECLARE and refrain from directly editing any impacted articles. S0091 (talk) 15:43, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sammi Cannold (January 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

COI edit

Please do not continue to edit until you have addressed any conflict of interest you might have. If you are connected to the subjects of the articles you edit (if you are them or know them in any way) you must disclose that and act in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines, as described by other editors above. —Ganesha811 (talk) 15:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi
I am not associated with the person of the subject. I don't have a COI to disclose. Thank you. Operator24601 (talk) 18:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sammi Cannold (October 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Operator24601! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply