Welcome edit

Hi, Onamir88. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 11:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Orly Lobel. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> The Book of Chzz, Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 11:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! Onamir88, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Onamir88. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 15:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Sarah (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Onamir88. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 17:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Sarah (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Onamir88. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 22:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Teahouse talkback: you've got new messages! edit

Hi there.

I have left some ideas and hints about sources for your article over at the Teahouse. Come on over and have a chat.

 
Hello, Onamir88. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got more messages! edit

Hi there.

I have left some more information for you over at the Teahouse. Official press releases as references.

 
Hello, Onamir88. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Help With Citations edit

Hi there.

I have been looking at the article on "Orly Lobel". - I see you are still having problems with getting the citations sorted out. There is a tool called "Provit" which may help you. It is a quick way to prepare, insert and review citations. There is a working demo so you can see how it works and if it's the right tool for you. Try It out here!

If it is your kind of tool you can activate it in Wikipedia by selecting "My preferences" then "Gadgets" - then under "Editing" you will find a tick box to turn it on or off. It has some extra templates such as "press releases" so that may well help.

I was in citation hell until I found it. Since then it's been a breeze.

I've updated some of the citations on the Orly Lobel page so you can see the difference. Hope it helps.
Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


Thanks! i will try it! I do seem to need all the help I can get... Onamir88 (talk) 13:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there again. I just spotted that there is some kind of bug with Proveit - and it does not work properly with pages that are in the "Articles_for_creation" queue - such as "Orly Lobel".

It works perfectly in user sandboxes. So I have created your own sandbox - you can get to it by clicking the link at the top of your user page.

If you copy the article text over there you should be able to sort out the references easily. Sorry for my error. As I said, if I can help just call! Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


Thanks again! Onamir88 (talk) 15:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

File permission problem with File:Orly Lobel 2x2 photo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Orly Lobel 2x2 photo.jpg, which you've sourced to Orly Lobel. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orly Lobel (October 12) edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.