Welcome!

edit
 
A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Obaidullah ak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 04:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


March 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kiraman Katibin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jinn with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 06:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Obaidullah ak, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Obaidullah ak! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Idris (prophet) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Torah in Islam with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Dhul-Qarnayn with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. David.moreno72 (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

You need to read in search of reliable sources and stop deleting material that you think is unreliable if it meets our criteria. Even contradicting the Quran doesn't make a source unreliable by our criteria. Otherwise you will probably get blocked. Doug Weller talk 12:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at David in Islam. bonadea contributions talk 20:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 05:08, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continuing the same disruptive editing under the account Obaidulla12356 (and now Hexushade). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I have extended your block since you have made another sockpuppet. If you do this again, I'm going to make the block indefinite. If that happens, all of your edits, no matter what they are, may be reverted as if they were vandalism. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:16, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 07:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply