Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Vision (August 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 18:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nsbfrank! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 18:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Nsbfrank, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nsbfrank|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Theroadislong Thank you for your kind suggestion. I can't find the form you are referring to where I can declare my COI; please kindly provide me with a guide. Thank you. Nsbfrank (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's literally just above your reply here. Theroadislong (talk) 09:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Remove the specification tables

edit

After declaring PAID on your User page, if you intend to continue to work on the draft, I recommend removing the specifications tables. David notMD (talk) 09:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, @David notMD I appreciate your comment. Do you have any other suggestions, apart from the table, that will make my article more transparent? Nsbfrank (talk) 09:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Beyond Vision has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Beyond Vision. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much@Theroadislong. I've made a couple of changes to the article following all the incredible comments here. Now, I would like to kindly request further editorial suggestions and revisions before I attempt resubmitting. Nsbfrank (talk) 11:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Don't edit further unless you disclose your paid editing first

edit
 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Nsbfrank, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nsbfrank|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have already added the template above the draft for transparency. I tried the paid tag but the editor suggested connected contributors paid instead {{connected contributor (paid)|user=Nsbfrank
Nsbfrank (talk) 11:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please use the correct format per {{paid|user=Nsbfrank|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Theroadislong (talk) 12:12, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you @TheroadislongI have done that. Nsbfrank (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Vision (August 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@TheroadislongI've made a couple of changes to improve the post. I would appreciate it if you could kindly highlight areas that need further improvement. Nsbfrank (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
You have made no changes since the decline? Theroadislong (talk) 15:43, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the comment. Yes, I did rephrase the previous draft, remove the tables, added the COI declaration, and focus more on sources that validate the statements in the article. Right now, I'm currently addressing the areas you mentioned. Nsbfrank (talk) 15:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
It will need WP:TNT and a complete re-write referring ONLY to what reliable independent sources say. Theroadislong (talk) 15:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beyond Vision (August 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you@Theroadislong for the contribution. Even though I'm not very sure of the references that are not valid, the company has multiple academic and external publications. However, I have revised the reference sources again following your suggestion. Nsbfrank (talk) 15:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Beyond Vision has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Beyond Vision. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)Reply