Nothingisreal1967

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nothingisreal1967/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Nothingisreal1967! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Nothingisreal1967/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Nothingisreal1967/sandbox. Thanks! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nothingisreal1967/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let It Be Beatles (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let It Be Beatles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 14:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Let it Be Beatles

I'm not an Articles for Creation editor but I do sometimes see when people try to cite blogs. Let me offer two suggestions:

(1) Cite actual newspapers and magazines, anything with an independent editorial voice. The Age has an article. Why wouldn't you cite that? That's the best I can find, but I found it in about 30 seconds searching for {"Graeme Dickenson" 3wrb}.

Anything more regional than The Age can be challenged as hyper-narrow circulation. That won't count towards notability but the regional newspapers can be good for verifiability as long as they aren't just pushing out press releases and interviews with the DJ.

(2) Do your citations as inline citations (footnotes). This requires citations (see point 1).

(Bonus) Per WP:BLOG the use of blogs and self-published content is discouraged, with some exceptions. If Ringo praised the show on his own blog, I'd say cite it.

Find another cite like the Age, find a handful of smaller journalists, and edit them in as footnotes. I'm dubious, but I'm rooting for you. Oblivy (talk) 02:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Let It Be Beatles

Hello, Nothingisreal1967. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Let It Be Beatles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)