NotAWeasel

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello NotAWeasel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Merbabu Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Personal attacks

With regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeli shelling of Beit Hanoun: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. BhaiSaab ^talk 04:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. BhaiSaab ^talk 04:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks, thanks

Hellow there. Please cut out the personal attacks. Your contributions history shows you've continued with the attacks on editors AFTER you edited out warnings which show you've at least read them (and also suggests you have some wikipedia experience). Please comment on content not editors. Perhaps this message is wasted on you if you have no intend on establishing yourself as a respected long term editor, but if you do want to make constructive contribution to "the project" you need to refine your style somewhat. [1], [2],

• "POV forking"? - that's rather advanced for a new editor:[3],
• if that is indeed so, there is a better way to handle it: [4]
• How do you know its "coordinated": [5]
• Yes, obscene language always convinces people that you are correct: [6]
• If you think you are right, why the need for obscenities? : [7]
• Don't blank Discussion pages: [8]
• regards --Merbabu 08:26, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The term POV Fork was used many times prior on the talk pages so I looked it up. It is absolutely correct to describe what Striver pulled as bad-faith POV forking. The presence of a high number of muslim editors all showing up at once even when they weren't talking on the other talk pages shows me they're engaging in a coordinated effort to control the article(s).

WP is NOT a democracy. I looked it up: VOTING IS NOT ALLOWED. NotAWeasel 13:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

ANI

FYI--Striver 11:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for 48 hours

I have blocked you for making some rather ugly comments to other editors, as well as attacking other editor's religious beliefs in your edit summaries and page blankings. If you protest this block simply type {{unblock}} below this message.--MONGO 11:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NotAWeasel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"ugly comments" are a crime? Attacking religious beliefs? Bullshit. And "page blankings"?? I never blanked a page, you liar.

Decline reason:

If you want to be part of the Wikipedia community, it means you have to abide by our rules especially Wikipedia:Civility. Your latest outburst below only demonstrates that you have anger management issues and that unblocking you now will only lead to further incivility towards others. --  Netsnipe  ►  14:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not a liar. this is a page blank by NotAWeasel: [9] :If you were mistaken/misunderstood that is fine (everyone makes mistakes - me too) but if you are intentionally lying that is not fine. (the fact that you may - or may not - have a point about the deficiency of voting doesn't mean you can blank pages) --Merbabu 14:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia policy specifically says voting is NOT ALLOWED. And I did not "blank" the whole page, I merely removed an ILLEGAL VOTE. NotAWeasel 14:18, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

In your zeal, you failed to notice that Tewfik (talk ·  contribs) had already protested along those lines. You should have pointed out meta:Polling is evil and WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a democracy instead of removing other people's comments wholesale. In reviewing your block I discounted this incident entirely, but your incivility remained a sticking point. --  Netsnipe  ►  14:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

You also blanked your talk page after I gave you the first "no personal attack" warning. BhaiSaab ^talk 16:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I love how MONGO's illegal block and bullshit lies are now being used to attack me. Really. Wonderful fucking place you've got here. Should we all just bow down to the pagan altar at Mecca and get it over with please?

That's an unusual way to request an unblock--Merbabu 14:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Please calm down

I know it is easy to get hotheaded, especially when dealing with contentious editors like the Muslim Guild and other POV pushers. But your behavior crossed the line. I also am fully aware that they love to misconstrue every little thing as a personal attack or "breach of civility", but it doesn't do you much good to get mad about it.

I am going to request Netsnipe reduce your block as per the blocking policy since it is clearly out of step with the guidelines, but please do calm down and be more civil. RunedChozo 17:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Also: I'm not going to remove your comments from your own talk page (that would be incivil) but it might be nice of you to remove some of these comments that others see as inflammatory and perhaps post an apology for exploding like that. RunedChozo 17:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

[10] please stay away from personal attacks and use of obscene word directed at your fellow editor. Thank you. Peace. --Nielswik_(talk) 14:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Muslim Guild POV-pushers trying to get original article deleted to protect their POV Fork

Striver's POV-pushing cohort User:Burgas00 has, in a fit of his POV-pushing zeal, nominated Beit_Hanoun_November_2006_incident for deletion here. The cowardly bad faith POV-pusher wouldn't even sign his own name to the deletion request either. I thought you should be warned of this. RunedChozo 22:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Wikipedia:Requested moves#15 November 2006, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.   ⇒ bsnowball  16:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

• reverted deletion of vandal warning[11]  ⇒ bsnowball  10:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[reverting deletion of the above warning for 2nd time  ⇒ bsnowball  10:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)]

STOP

Enough.

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Echoing Pat here. I agree with many of your edits or parts of your edits, but telling other users to "go pray to your pagan black box in mecca" is simply unaccepablt and unproductive. JoshuaZ 04:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Also keep in mind you will have a far better chance of convincing people to listen to you if you are calm and not insulting. JoshuaZ 04:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.. Peace. --Nielswik_(talk) 06:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Canadian-Bacon 05:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Archiving Talk Pages

Archiving a talk page does not merely constitute deleting it. Please see WP:ARCHIVE for instructions on how to accurately archive a talk page. Thank you. Canadian-Bacon 05:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• 

  You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Viridae^Talk 07:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Viridae^Talk 07:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)