User talk:Nikiii246/wiki


Welcome!

edit

Hi Nikiii246! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 13:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@I dream of horses: Hello, thank you, I hope I can help with the wiki preview.--Nikiii246 (talk) 15:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@I dream of horses: I had a question, did I follow the principles in making this draft?--Nikiii246 (talk) 15:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit

Hi there, you are making a lot of edits very fast and you might want to slow down a bit. Some of your edits are fine and constructive, thank you for those. Others are a bit baffling or unconstructive. This one resulted in half a sentence. This one removed spaces between words and sentences. This one removed statements which were referenced, plus added a typo (such to duch). May I suggest you slow down and also start adding edit summaries when you make edits? That means other editors can see what your intent was. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 19:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tacyarg

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Tacyarg (talk) 19:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Tacyarg: Hello, thank you I'm very interested in Wiki and I want to help and that's what I mean, --Nikiii246 (talk) 19:27, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi again, it's great that you want to help, but please put some thought into what you are doing. In this edit you undid another user's removal of the statement "In fact, Peter Parker was very well aware of this even before becoming Chairman". If you look at the summary made when another editor removed this, you can see that it was because it was unsourced - there is no reference to back it up. In this edit, on the other hand, you removed some vandalism by another editor - thank you for that. Again, if you use edit aummaries it is easier to tell what you are doing. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 07:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Tacyarg:Thank you, I thwarted the sabotage in the second edition because I think the user was sabotaging.--Nikiii246 (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: You are like a song (August 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Atlantic306 (talk) 23:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nikiii246! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Atlantic306 (talk) 23:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello, thank you--Nikiii246 (talk) 23:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

47.25.160.151

edit

Hi NiKIII246. I made an edit to the page on sundown towns. Revision 973549255 There was a misquote from the episode for "Lovecraft Country" "sunset" should have been "sundown" this was what was actually said during the episode. You reverted the change. I don't believe that was warranted as the page now misquotes the episode. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.25.160.151 (talk) 21:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@47.25.160.151 Each edit requires a resource. Do you have a resource to prove your point?--Nikiii246 (talk) 21:23, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ehsan Alikhani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Username

edit

Hi there, in response to your post on my Talk page - this page sets out how to change your username. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 18:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I did @Tacyarg: RenameThank you my dear friend and wish you all the best. Nlki (Conversation) 19:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanaz Tari (August 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Dan arndt: Thank you my friend. Nlki (Conversation) 07:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikiii246 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I think there was a mistake and I have closed b wrong please check all the edits of my servant to witness yourself g I am innocent and at all this person you say I am not happy to take me out of the blockHi, I think there was a mistake and I have closed b wrong please check all the edits of my servant to see yourself g I am innocent and at all this person you say I am not happy to take me out of the block Please ask dear managers to appeal because there was definitely a mistake I would like to have the necessary inspection to prove my innocent ness I have not done any mistakes and I have no account of Zapas at all.I am an Iranian user like other Iranians using a network and a INTERNET K via SIM card it is natural that many Iranians have the same IP because everyone uses the same type of internet and that's why I say that a mistake has occurred and I am applying for appeal kindly.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 16:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nlki (Conversation) 16:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Jpgordon: I am an Iranian user like other Iranians using a network and a INTERNET K via SIM card it is natural that many Iranians have the same IP because everyone uses the same type of internet and that's why I say that a mistake has occurred and I am applying for appeal kindly.--Nlki (Conversation) 16:38, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Jpgordon: Qurban Please check my account once again definitely there is a mistake I have no other account and I don't want to review.--Nlki (Conversation) 16:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikiii246 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, I think there was a mistake and I have closed b wrong please check all the edits of my servant to witness yourself g I am innocent and at all this person you say I am not happy to take me out of the blockHi, I think there was a mistake and I have closed b wrong please check all the edits of my servant to see yourself g I am innocent and at all this person you say I am not happy to take me out of the block Please ask dear managers to appeal because there was definitely a mistake I would like to have the necessary inspection to prove my innocent ness I have not done any mistakes and I have no account of Zapas at all.I am an Iranian user like other Iranians using a network and a INTERNET K via SIM card it is natural that many Iranians have the same IP because everyone uses the same type of internet and that's why I say that a mistake has occurred and I am applying for appeal kindly.Please check my account once again definitely there is a mistake I have no other account and I don't want to review

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ohnoitsjamie: Thank you, great manager, I mentioned all the things you mentioned below, and I hope the managers will accept my request.--Nlki (Conversation) 21:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikiii246 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello dear administrators of Wikipedia I apologize for the mistakes I made and I regret my past mistakes. And I want to stop talking about my past sabotages and serve Wikipedia. I can assure you that I will not make any more mistakes and I will work to improve the system. *the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or *the block is no longer necessary because you *#I have realized all my mistakes and I know that I am guilty and I ask you, dear managers, to give me a chance so that I can make up for my past mistakes and show that my goal is to serve the system and not to sabotage it. *#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will not damage the system in any way and I will try to fight the sabotage to protect the system *#will make useful contributions instead.Instead, I will try to fight the sabotage that can be done in the system and not let the system be harmed. I have not been given a chance so far. I ask you to give me a chance to prove myself to you. Finally, I would like to say that I have realized all my mistakes and I know that I am wrong and I ask you to forgive me and allow me to return to the system so that I can prove that I have changed. I hope the great managers of Wikipedia are kind. Accept this humble request

Decline reason:

You never truly admit to what you've done wrong. YOu just said you apologize for your mistakes but don't describe what those mistakes are. You need to be a lot more specific. What did you do wrong? What specifically will you do differently? You say a lot of empty words here. only (talk) 21:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Only: In the past, I used to add the articles of my friends and acquaintances to Wikipedia and create articles for people who are not famous, and by creating various accounts, I was playing backup games. I have realized my mistakes for several months and I want to have a clean start. To be able to serve the system to reduce the burden of my past sins a little. In the past, I was editing by creating various accounts and I had secrets about creating an article that I said I had realized my mistakes for several months and I am a clean start. And please give me this humble permission.--Nlki (Conversation) 21:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikiii246 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello dear administrators of Wikipedia I apologize for the mistakes In the past, I used to add the articles of my friends and acquaintances to Wikipedia and create articles for people who are not famous, and by creating various accounts, I was playing backup games. I have realized my mistakes for several months and I want to have a clean start. To be able to serve the system to reduce the burden of my past sins a little. In the past, I was editing by creating various accounts and I had secrets about creating an article that I said I had realized my mistakes for several months and I am a clean start. And please give me this humble permission.I thought I could make a name for myself by creating an article for friends and acquaintances, which I realized months ago was wrong, and Wikipedia is moving forward with its policies where I realized I was wrong, and I did not help the system by creating various accounts, and in fact I was sabotaging it, which is why I have regretted it for several months and I want to be able to make up for all my past mistakes with a clean start so that I can serve the system. Because I have done sabotage before, I can serve the system against many sabotages and fight against sabotage, and my main goal is to return to this purpose, because I have completely changed and I want a clean slate if the dear managers agree to my humble request.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Navigation bar Peter Maffay

edit

 Template:Navigation bar Peter Maffay has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Richard3120 (talk) 21:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kazem Afrandnia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)Reply