Nidafatimashahi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Nidafatimashahi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015

edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Asaduddin Owaisi does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kavita Krishnan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not change the date of birth field in the Infobox without citing a reliable source which can be verified by others. Yamaguchi先生 18:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Nabha Natesh) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Nabha Natesh, Nidafatimashahi!

Wikipedia editor Human3015 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

expand the article with more reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Human3015's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Critical reception

edit

Hi, when adding critical response content as you did here, please note that a rating requires additional context. For instance, saying that a film got 3.5 stars is meaningless if we don't know how many stars the range was. 3.5 out of 5? 3.5 out of 10? Makes a huge difference. More importantly, we should be providing prose content to explain the key aspects of the review, perhaps even with a brief quotation excerpt:

Ralph Singh of the International Business Times found the grainy quality of the film to be distracting, but praised Doe's performance, commenting, "Doe, for once, has managed to really drive the emotional story such that you finally like him after years of bad acting."

Without context, there is little academic value to the additions, and we are not an indiscriminate collection of statistics. Thanks in advance for keeping this in your mind, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bihar Legislative Assembly election, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tariq Anwar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015

edit

  Your addition to Bajirao Mastani (film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] Plot summaries may not be copied or even closely paraphrased from other sources. They must be written from scratch in your own words. If you are not capable of this, don't attempt it. Content you submitted can be found here. Plagiarism is lazy and academically dishonest and will not be tolerated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 5 February

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Nidafatimashahi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of BJP OBC Morcha for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BJP OBC Morcha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BJP OBC Morcha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXray 09:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply