User talk:Natalya/Archive11
Archives | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
Last archive: 20 April 2011 |
Don Murphy wants an Admin
editHere be an update: Shitapedia- Updated. I love how some people on his board are questioning him. Philip Gronowski Contribs 17:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 5th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 6 | 5 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism (Bald Eagle)
editThanks for your words of encouragement, but I would like to encourage you to start a dialog with your fellow page-protection admins to seriously re-evaluate your standards for page protection. For context, see: Talk:Bald Eagle#Vandalism. There is real confusion among the editors there, now that there has been so much vandalism that the real content is in question. The high level of reverts mixed in with the occasional update makes it extremely tedious to find the correct content. This is a good example of how allowing IP edits actually causes more harm than good.
I believe that once a page has been flagged as a popular target for anonymous edits, it should be semi-protected permanently. At that point, the value of the occasional helpful IP edit no longer outweighs the constant barrage of nonsense or deliberate misinformation. The possibility that this will be missed and allowed to stay in the article far outweighs the helpful information that might be missed. The WP standard is that it is better to have no information, rather than wrong information. Dhaluza 10:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Chesster
editHi Natalya,
Thanks! I happened to see your edit to his page when I just now looked at recent changes. There has been a barrage of sockpuppet attacks on Metros's talk page, and this one just seems to fit the pattern: pasting in something really huge and disruptive, and then whining "politely" to be unblocked. It's probably this one: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Viva_La_France. Compare Chesster's edits, for example, with the most recent other sockpuppet: [1]. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 04:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Cotton
editJust wanted to say thanks for looking into the Cotton article for me for protection. The problem is, every time its a new IP vandalising it, so reporting to AIV isn't going to help. As it happens, I don't actually have any interest in the article, its just on my watch list from previous vandalism. Thanks again RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 16:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
editThe Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Thanks For Not Only Helping Me, But Also Doing The Job I Needed Help With Doing For Me On My Userpage - Very Appreciated! ACBest 17:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
Re:Template
editThanks, it was exactly what i was looking for!! But i didnt know how to put it on the left, so it's in the center, above the title... if you know how to change it, tell me! -Sucrine ( ><> talk) 17:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Re. Beat me to it again!
editWell, you've also edit conflicted me on declining Robert Hooke and semi-protecting John Amaechi, so I guess we're even. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 19:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Me too. By the way, it seems that we both like to pick requests starting from the bottom. :-) Regards, Húsönd 19:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Weird...
edit[2] That's something you don't see every day :-P. By the way, I had already protected Whitney Houston a minute before you declined. You can unprotect it if you want. Nishkid64 22:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Heh, I just noticed you messaged me. Sure, go ahead an unprotect. Nishkid64 22:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thanks for the message
editre disambiguation. what can be done in (say) that situation, where the disambiguation is imaginary? Later update: This Intravenous_drug_use was the page that I thought you referring to.... I do understand your original message now. But still raise this other question as long as you're there. Martin | talk • contribs 04:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
What I mean is, when someone says "I am an IV drug user", do you think that that is ambiguous, and needs disambiguation? Martin | talk • contribs 00:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't think I was being clear. Thanks again for replying. I added a comment to the Intravenous_drug_use disambiguation talk page, where I believe it is more appropriately placed. Martin | talk • contribs 07:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Re:Admin coaching
editHaha, I'm already waiting in line since last December, so I check in on that site often. But anyway, thanks for the link, and for your reply! Cheers!! Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 13:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 12th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 7 | 12 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
editKeep up the great work your self! I have a reputation for being lightning fast you know ;). Cheers, oh and I was on the wall about the LGBT template so thanks for making my day easier! :). ~ Arjun 03:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Lol I think we are both fast; you beat me to the protection on Sasuke Uchiha. But then I added the sprotect template thinking I did the protection. Hee hee :). Cheers. ~ Arjun 03:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
The user has already been warned on numerous different IP addresses, therefore warning is completely pointless. These are repeated bad faith edits. The article really needs a cycle of semiprotection so that the anon vandal can find other things to do with his or her life. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 15:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- See what I mean? [[3] youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. You are probably correct. I just got burnt out on reverting and being called various names :). If its not too much of a problem, would you mind adding the article to your watchlist for a couple of weeks? I would gladly owe you one wikifavor, to be cashed whenever and for whatever Wikipedia project that you may undertake in the future. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 17:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 19th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 8 | 19 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
This is for your words of support on his talk page regarding what happened to him - the definition of what this barnstar means, "being nice without being asked". Thanks. Will (Speak to Me/Breathe)(Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash) 15:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC) |
Find Peace in Wanderlust...not...
edithey. I had an ipod before anybody knew what it was. Also, just so you know, you should be in bed right now, or I will tell your mother. Weird Wetland 03:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks very much!
editThat means a lot :) Hope you're doing well. – riana_dzasta 12:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Son Of A... Banned User
editI saw that you once banned the user Son of a Peach. I was following this user's activity leading up to the ban, as well as afterwards. Two sockpuppet accounts fruited from the ban: Flameviper12, and Wiki Duct Tape. I believe I have found another sock puppet account: Son Of A Biscuit!. The user's M.O. has changed, but they should be watched closely by someone with admin capabilities. Somnabot 19:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Hildanknight
editHave you seen Hildanknight's userpage? I don't know whether he'll do it or not, but I certainly hope he doesn't. Poor guy. Ripberger 07:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Advice
editHey its been a while since we exchanged a few messages.[4] I've run into a little problem actually and am quite unsure about what to do next. Its actually an edit-war. We'll, obviously I feel that I'm quite reasonable and thats what the other fellow must be feeling as well. So can you check out the discussion on Orkut. And please check out the history too. The user[5] is like reverting so many edits and re-adding content. He's like adamant about his data and does not seem to want to wait till the matter is decided to add it back. Tell me what I could do to not further aggravate the situation. — Huntscorpio (talk · contribs · count) 16:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. The IP has hit Biome now, and I don't wanna slap another toothless warning on it again. I see that you blocked it recently, and thought you might be in a better position to decide what to do. Thanks. Xiner (talk, email) 00:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
just for chat
edityour asl plz. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vinay412 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC).
Survey Invitation
editHi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
Re:Essjay's edit counter
editHi, Natalya. I tried to acess Essjay's edit counter just recently, and apparently, the Web page is no longer there. Hope you can help me to find another page like that, if it's okay with you. Don't rush, worry about mine last. Thanks! --Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 08:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Concerning your Admin Coaching assignments
editYour name is still listed at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Volunteers. The department is heavily backlogged with student's requests for coaches, and we need your help!
Note that the instructions may have changed since the last time you checked, and the department now follows a self-help process...
If you don't currently have a student, or if you believe you can handle another one, please select a student from the request list at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests and contact them. See the instructions on Wikipedia:Admin coaching. Good luck.
If you are no longer available to coach, , please remove yourself from the volunteers list.
Thank you.
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Admin coaching
editHi, Natalya. Well, sorry if I'm a little blunt and direct and impolite...but if I'm not mistaken, the coaching request system is now different, is it not? You have to go contact a coach yourself....so...can you be my coach? You've been helping me so much since I came here..I believe I could work better with you...that is, if you're not too busy. If you already have too much on your hand, never mind then, I can wait. Bye, and cheers! Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 05:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
hi!
editHi Natalya, how have you been? This is User:Gflores from many months ago. I have returned. :) As you can see, I changed my name to get a fresh start. I probably won't be editing as much as I used to back in the day, but I'll be fairly active, so drop me a message whenever you want. Lastly, I want to say thank you for your heartfelt message that June 13. I'm sorry I waited so long to tell you that, but thank you. :) MahangaTalk to me 02:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Re:Admin coaching
editNah, don't worry, I don't mind. Thanks anyway, for your offer. I sure am, and will, gonna look for you if I have any questions. Cheers! Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 07:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
editWeekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
How on earth
editHow on earth do you make all those userboxes on the right of your screen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PseudonymVoltaire (talk • contribs)
University of Wisconsin
editHi there. If you are still one of the disambig gurus, would you take a quick look at University of Wisconsin (disambiguation)? It's nothing I have any stake in, but it just seems like a very large and complex dab-page, and perhaps you and the dab-crew might have some suggestions or existing examples to help them. There is commentary on the Talk page. - David Oberst 18:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Question
editWondering if I could request your help with removing personally identifying information on a discussion page -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/User:Egwiki. The "sockpuppets" referenced are supporters who thought they were helping in a debate without understanding Wiki protocol. They had no ill intent. I was hoping you might let me know how to remove names listed on this page so they will not continue to be picked up by Google keyword search. Many thanks! Egwiki 04:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Because of private correspondence with the Foundation, I have asked an admin to unblock this user. I do not anticipate any involvement by him with you in the future. Other people are watching his page and contributions. He has admitted to acting up in the past, and has assured me that he will endeavor to contribute in a positive manner in the future. If you have any concerns about this in the future, feel free to bring them to me. Cary Bass demandez 12:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
editRe:Edit counters
editHi Natalya. I am nearing my 400th edit now, and wanted to check it out, but there doesn't seem to be any edit counters that could help me. They're either cancelled or ones that count the number of edits made to a page, not the number of edits a user has. So, I was wondering if you knew of any other edit counters. Thanks and cheers!! PS:By the way, a very Happy belated birthday to you! I just found out from the messages from the Commitee. Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 14:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
By the way, how do you put up a 'Article of the Day' template or such stuff? 'Picture of the Day', I know from what you taught me the last time(thanks!), but as for the rest, I'm stuck. Many thanks! Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 09:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
This is for you, for being able to save me from drowning in my own flood of questions! Many thanks, Natalya! Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC) 12:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks again! Cheers!!! Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Re:Gnome Week
editsilly question
editDear Natalya. Should I create a disambiguation page for just two homonymous artists? Or just add the remark on the header of the article which already exists for one of them? The other doesn't have an article yet. Have you finished your disambiguation tutorial? :) Regards, Courage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Courage Dog (talk • contribs)
A New contributors' help page Barnstar
editThe Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
As one of the top four contributors to Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, you deserve this barnstar. Thank you! Jreferee (Talk) 05:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC) |
RE: Hello, Friend!
editHello right back atcha! If you ever want to chat, I'm on Skype nearly all the time. Just give me a bell :). Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 21:22, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm about. I use Wikipedia all the time for reading, so any messages I tend to get pretty sharpish. As for how Wikipedia is going for me, as you might have guessed by my editing patterns, not very. The bottom fell out of Wikipedia for me when Esperanza was deleted. Wikipedia stopped being fun, so I stopped editing regularly.
- I just find it sad really that people were so offended by the concept of Esperanza. While it obviously had its faults, it really didn't deserve the hammering it got. In essence, it was just there to make Wikipedia a nicer place to be. Is that such a bad thing? I did edit the encyclopedia in addition to using Esperanza, but clearly my editing was depedent on Esperanza being there. So, by deleting Esperanza, they lost me. Ho hum.
- Anyway, in real life, I've just started my second year of A level (12th grade) and am studying Spanish, German, Music and Philosophy. I've only started German last year. Eek.
- So, yes, how are you keeping? Kind regards, —Celestianpower háblame 21:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm definitely with you on the fearing talking openly front, and that was exactly how I felt. I was in the council practically from its conception, and we always "got it", if I remember. We recognised that Esperanza != Wikipedia, but did want to continue it because it was good fun and a good chance to get talking to other people. "A happier Wikipedian = a more productive editor" was always my motto.
- Warmest regards, —Celestianpower háblame 21:57, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- The epitomy of what was wrong in the attitudes to Esperanza is this (from the new Esperanza essay): "This essay serves as a warning to all editors that existing projects must be open and transparent to all editors at all times, not to be overly hierarchical lest they are to meet a fate similar to Esperanza's." People just didn't get it. At all. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 22:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Good to see you in my watchlist, by the way. :) Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 21:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Is that to me, or Natalya? If it's to me, why thank you kind Sir! Nice to see you again too :). Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 21:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Heh, it's to both. Wiki has been treating me well (not as many edits as I used to, but that's because real life has picked up its pace), and real life has been treating me well as well (third year of college, dealing with the horrible subjects of aerodynamics, fluid dynamics, stress, strain, sensors and Salsa)... how about you? Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 23:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, they're going well right now, and hopefully they'll stay that way. I hope I had more time to use for Wiki, though, because I won't be researching or doing major edits to articles for a while... but I'm still here trying to help out the best I can. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 03:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I'm dealing with Bach chorales, the reunification of Germany, poverty in Spain, serialism, religious experience and Immanuel Kant's deontological ethics, amongst other things :). It's going quite well, but we have far more work than last year :S. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 18:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, they're going well right now, and hopefully they'll stay that way. I hope I had more time to use for Wiki, though, because I won't be researching or doing major edits to articles for a while... but I'm still here trying to help out the best I can. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 03:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Heh, it's to both. Wiki has been treating me well (not as many edits as I used to, but that's because real life has picked up its pace), and real life has been treating me well as well (third year of college, dealing with the horrible subjects of aerodynamics, fluid dynamics, stress, strain, sensors and Salsa)... how about you? Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 23:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Is that to me, or Natalya? If it's to me, why thank you kind Sir! Nice to see you again too :). Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 21:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
The Raven's Apprentice has returned to his master
editHello, Nat. Do you know who this guy is? He was a big contributor to Pokémon articles. He left Wikipedia a few days ago. -- Altiris Exeunt 09:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi
editGood to see you back again. Hope you are well. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
=O!
editWelcome back! I haven't seen you around recently. Will (talk) 08:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:Hope all is well
editHello! Everything is going great here. Mostly caught up in work, but life in general is pretty good too. I edit when I can, mostly little things that I notice when I'm reading. To get the full scope of my contributions, you have to also look at the account I use on public computers, but admittedly that doesn't really make it any more impressive. Alas, I doubt I'll ever have 300-800 edits in a month again, but every once in a while I'm sure I'll get the urge to go on recent changes patrol or clear out the speedy deletions queue. How is everything going for you? Eric (EWS23) 18:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
new coachee?
editHi there - I was browsing the list of available admins for coaching, and wondered if you would be able and willing to take me on? docboat 01:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Happy Belated Halloween
editDearest Natalya,
Zacharycrimsonwolf wishes you a Happy Halloween! Send this card to other spookers, even if it's a little late. Have a spooky Halloween and cheers!
Credits
editThanks to JetLover for his pumpkin image!
If this card comes to you, tell Zachary how you like his card!
- 06:21, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
First Edit
editHappy First Edit Day
edit- FROM YOUR FRIEND:
Happy first edit day
editHi Natalya, loooong time no see! I noticed this being dropped off on your userpage, and I assumed it was meant for your talk page. Revert me if I'm wrong. good day! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Admin Coaching Re-confirmation
editHello, previously you expressed interest in participating in the Wikipedia:Admin coaching project. We are currently conducting a reconfirmation drive to give coaches the opportunity to update their information and capacity to participate in the project. Please visit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to update your status and move your entry to the Active list. Also, please remember to update your capacity (5th table variable) in the form of a fraction (eg. 2/3 means you are currently coaching 2 students, and could accept 1 more student). Thank you. MBisanz talk 09:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)