October 2022

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 04:39, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 04:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing is not optional, and calling significant edits "typos" is not a good look. Acroterion (talk) 04:11, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bodies: The Exhibition

edit

I have reverted your recent addition to Bodies: The Exhibition. Even if the content you added is accurate, no source for that information was supplied. Verification is a core content policy (please read that link carefully). You also need to be aware of Wikipedia's manual of style, specifically WP:LEAD, which states that the first part of an article (before the contents box that gets automatically added) should be a summary of the main article. Your addition was made only in the lead, so was inappropriate there. I will have no objection to you re-adding the material provided you do give it a source and place it somewhere relevant in the main text (it won't need to be repeated in the lead, as it is a minor extra fact). Mike Turnbull (talk) 12:54, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Naniigray! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Naniigray/sandbox

edit

  Hello, Naniigray. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Naniigray/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Naniigray/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, Naniigray. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply