Nala28

AfC notification: Draft:Juan Benet (businessman) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Juan Benet (businessman). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Robert McClenon! I've found another source for that information (the individual's official resume) that hopefully is deemed more authoritative. Please take another look when you have time. Thank you for the feedback! Nala28 (talk) 11:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Benet (computer scientist) (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Nala28! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:44, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, I dream of horses. I've sourced a number of new citations (mostly highly-reputable news sources) based on your feedback and my reading of the reliable citation guidelines. I left in the references to Benet's official resume, since it is an authoritative self-published source on the individual himself (which is considered authoritative as described here). Looking forward to any additional feedback you have!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juan Benet (computer scientist) (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback! I've overwritten the redirect as suggested and will deprecate this draft.

Orphaned non-free image File:Protocol-labs-logo-2019.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Protocol-labs-logo-2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, I'm HaeB. I noticed that you recently removed content from InterPlanetary File System without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HaeB (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi HaeB (talk), thanks for taking a look. As you can see in the diff, this content was removed as part of a wider effort to make the page more readable, organized, and objective. The quote in question "In 2019 the project has been criticized for being "still not usable for websites" in spite of attracting huge investments and creating an "overextended, under-documented, and unfinished constellation of projects"" is from an unreliable source (the author's personal blog), and gives undue weight to a single perspective that is not representative of a majority or large minority opinion (as demonstrated in a basic google search). In addition, the content itself has an impartial tone which implies that one individual's experience is a factual assessment of the project's current state. Sorry for not sufficiently documenting that rhetoric in my change description. Are you onboard with me linking to this justification and removing this content again?

Thanks for your help! Nala28 (talk) 16:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist)

Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Juan Benet (computer scientist) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)