Your submission at Articles for creation: Context-Based Sustainability (March 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chetsford (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Mwmcelroy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Context-Based Sustainability has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Context-Based Sustainability. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:23, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Context-Based Sustainability has been accepted

edit
 
Context-Based Sustainability, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:50, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

==

==

Hello everyone.

This is user Mwmcelroy writing. I am the original author of this article and also the creator (Mark McElroy) of the concept it describes (Context-Based Sustainability, or CBS). I am also the founder and Executive Director of the Center for Sustainable Organizations (CSO), in whose name and through which the CBS method is pushed out to the world. CSO is a public non-profit charity in the U.S. -- a registered 501(c)(3). Everything we produce is produced for the public good.

Thus, far from having a conflict of interest of any kind on this matter, I/we (CSO) are duty-bound to disclose our concept for the public good, which is what the publication of this article on Wikipedia is intended to do. Many others others will contribute to it, I'm sure.

I am also a partner in Thomas & McElroy LLC, whose MultiCapital Scorecard method is also an extended and open-source implementation of CBS.

As stated in the article, both the CBS and MultiCapital Scorecard methods are freely available for end-user application by organizations anywhere in the world who want to use them on a royalty- or license-free basis.

Happy to answer any further questions about this.

Regards,

Mark Mwmcelroy (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate First- & Second- Person Points of View

edit

Statements of 1st and 2nd person points of view seem only to occur in the form of legitimate third-party quotations that are used. Please say if you disagree. Happy to fix. Mwmcelroy (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Mwmcelroy. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Sustainability accounting, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:48, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Context-Based Sustainability, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Context-Based Sustainability

edit
 

The article Context-Based Sustainability has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is a HUGE conflict of interest wrt. this article's author (now deleted) and all the sources I could find about this are unreliable business presentation type sources trying to sell / promote this thing (whatever it even is) not write about it in an encyclopedic manner.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 03:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Context-Based Sustainability

edit

Please be aware that we do not cite Wikipedia. Please find a different source (maybe the Wikipedia article you cited contains one - I didn't check) Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply