Murdikar

Speedy deletion of Raghunath Purushottam Paranjpe

A tag has been placed on Raghunath Purushottam Paranjpe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chetblong^{T C} 05:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Murdikar! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ChetblongT C 05:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Ramji kao raw

A tag has been placed on Ramji kao raw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dmwiki (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 29 September 2008 western India bombings has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 05:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

I just looked over your recent contributions, and I think that you are not understanding the purpose of Wikipedia. You may not replace the contents of articles with your own opinions. Actually, you can't include your own opinions anywhere on this site. Instead, all you may do is collect appropriate summaries of information already published in reliable sources. You may not conduct what we call original research, and when you do add information from sources, you need to make sure that you present it in a a neutral fashion. The string of edits you've made to articles relating to terrorism in India are unacceptable and are likely to result in you being blocked soon for disruptive editing. If you have any questions, you may ask here, as I've watchlisted this page. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism

Dear user, kindly understand the policies of wikipedia before you add a text, a link or a word to any article published online on wikipedia. your recent edits on my article about an Indian Bishop was totally not acceptable. You had tried to choose your own words than what exactly was in the press and vandalised my article by adding the links in the place of text and removing my text and adding your own text. Kindly keep your personal opinions to yourself and write about the facts with the sources. As you were warned before so please follow the wikipedia guidelines on wikipedia. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 14:45, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Jeromeenriquez (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Vanamonde (Talk) 14:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)