Mukhtar ahmed kakar alizai

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Muhammad Shah Kakar

Hello Mukhtar ahmed kakar alizai,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr Muhammad Shah Kakar for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Robert G. (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muhammad Shah Kakar

The article Muhammad Shah Kakar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad Shah Kakar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muhammad Shah Kakar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a social network or place to write about yourself

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 07:21, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr Muhammad shah Kakar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dr Muhammad shah Kakar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sro23 (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Akhtar Abdur Rahman. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McKhan ^(talk) 23:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Original research

All material in Wikipedia that might be challenged has to be sourced to reliably published sources. We don't allow editors' own research, see WP:NOR. This includes family trees. I also don't know why you added text (unsourced) to an image and added that to an article.

And finally, although you might well meet our criteria for notability and thus an article on you (which would not be "your article", it would be our article that anyone can edit), you need to stop adding information about yourself, including photos. This is an encyclopedia, not a website where people can promote themselves, their companies, etc. Doug Weller talk 16:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm Pjposullivan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mullazai tribe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pjposullivan (talk) 12:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I've reverted your edits to Mullazai tribe again, because you did not say why you changed it, nor provided a citation. You have not communicated anything after the last time I reverted your edits. Please provide citations. The article has been around for a long time and describes a tribe in Balochistan. If this is a different tribe, then create a new article. If you are not able to communicate and describe why you changed it, or provide citations, then maybe it's best to edit a different Wikipedia. Pjposullivan (talk) 10:56, 20 November 2020 (UTC)