Mrdavidbarrie

Is this article biased in favor of material on Queen's Park? Should the history section be subbed since at the moment parts feel like 'so what'?

There are several sections devoted to totally obscure history that doesn't serve to really tell us anything significant about Castleford?

I'm tempted to edit - but don't want to put people's noses out of joint. :)

What do you think?

Welcome!

Hello, Mrdavidbarrie! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --Jza84 |  Talk  19:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Regarding Castleford, that's fine, but the article isn't "mine" as such - Wikipedia is an open source project and nobody has ownership of articles. Your comments on the town left for me are perfectly fine outside of article space, but on the article remember to cite your sources at all times. Hope that helps and good luck. --Jza84 |  Talk  19:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

David Barrie

Regarding the David Barrie article, please read through our policy entitled Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Currently, this article is at odds with our regulations and may face speedy deletion. --Jza84 |  Talk  19:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Castleford

If you're keen on writing up a great article on Castleford, there is only one page I can recommend: WP:UKCITIES. It's our content and layout guide on how to write about settlements in the UK. I don't know much, if anything about the town - I only editted it in passing. I hope WP:UKCITIES helps towards the converage of the town, --Jza84 |  Talk  19:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Barrie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of David Barrie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Barrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Barrie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 19:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)