Your submission at Articles for creation: The Oreo Cat (May 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! ModugnoT, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Refs are almost entirely social media. edit

Of course Oreo's refs are almost entirely Social media. He is a social media icon. Many of his social accounts are verified. The main reference I can give you, which I have given, is our website. Not sure what else you want here. ModugnoT (talk) 13:09, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

While I didn't make the comment about the refs, sources that demonstrate notability are needed, while sources and presentation that looks like an attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion should be removed. --Ronz (talk) 01:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Oreo Cat (August 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest policy edit

  Hello, ModugnoT. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

To be completely transparent in regards to my article, I am a Connected contributor.ModugnoT (talk) 12:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Connected contributor edit

Connected contributor <ref></https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Connected_contributor> User1 = ModugnoT | U1-EH = yes | U1-declared = yes ModugnoT (talk) 12:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

We appreciate your attempt, but this isn't the proper way or place to use this template. It goes on the article talk page. I will place it there, although it won't really matter anyway if the article draft is deleted. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Oreo Cat (September 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eddie891 Talk Work 00:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Oreo Cat edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Oreo Cat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.theoreocat.com/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:TheOreoCat.jpeg edit

 

The file File:TheOreoCat.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Draft:The Oreo Cat. No other use. No permission as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:The Kitty Chef.jpeg edit

 

The file File:The Kitty Chef.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Draft:The Oreo Cat. No other use. No permission as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:54, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply