Welcome! edit

 
Hello, Mightyaighty!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

 Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arjun Sharda (May 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ts12rActalk to me 17:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mightyaighty! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rActalk to me 17:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arjun Sharda (May 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I removed the conflict of interest, because I plan on Wikipedia to write about more people. I didn't clearly understand what the conflict of interest was. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia so apologies, if I am doing things by mistake.
I'll rewrite the submission, but can you help clarify what in specific for the submission references? Mightyaighty (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arjun Sharda (May 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 04:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sharda and Arjun edit

  Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arjun Sharda (September 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of TLEEM edit

Hello Mightyaighty,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged TLEEM for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 00:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mightyaighty (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I apologize for the actions on my behalf that were unreasonable and unjustifiable. I originally wrote a article about Arjun and TLEEM as Arjun is my friend and given he and his organization is in the news, I wanted to write about him as a first article. As someone new to Wikipedia, I wanted to explore making articles and editing. I've learned from this block that I need to focus more on editing other articles before jumping into action and writing articles, because there aren't many things that are as clear to beginners about the rules and information about how to make Wikipedia Articles. I completely understand Wiki Administration team's suspicion, and i'm just here to clarify. - Mightyaighty Mightyaighty (talk) 11:56 am, 31 January 2024, last Wednesday (3 days ago) (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

"conditional unblock with a WP:topic ban on Arjun Sharda and TLEEM, both broadly construed. User can edit about tech and business." Welcome back. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply


You will not be unblocked to edit about TLEEM, Arjun Sharda, or any other subject with which you have a WP:conflict of interest. Please describe what constructive edits you would make. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I can make edits for articles in various different categories, however I would like to focus on editing more of technology-related and business-related articles, by doing things like contributing new information to articles and updating outdated articles. Once again, I apologize for any damage caused from my actions. Mightyaighty (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Looks OK to me, but I'd like a double check by another admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Red-tailed hawk and Ohnoitsjamie: Double check on unblock request, please. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm OK with unblocking, though I will be happy to reblock if they attempt to write about either topic again, regardless of how many edits they make in the interim. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Deepfriedokra: I'm OK with a conditional unblock that includes a topic ban on Arjun Sharda and TLEEM, both broadly construed. User says that they can edit about tech and business; might as well give them some WP:ROPE. That being said, does Bbb23, the blocking admin, have any objection that I'm missing? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am not as confident as others, but I'll defer to the apparent consensus. The topic ban should be a condition of the unblock.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply