Your submission at Articles for creation: The Emigsville Band (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Michaelkirk7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Emigsville Band (November 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Chance of success will increase if this gets a lot shorter and if you identify on the Talk page which three or more refs meet the ref criteria. See also WP:NMUSIC. David notMD (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Over-referencing

edit

Simple factual statements do not need 5-8 refs. Yes, Declined, but that is more an issue of quality of refs, not quantity. Also, town bands may not clear the bar of notability. For example, my town of 10,500 has a continuous history of bands dating back to 1870, but I doubt Wikipedia notable. A minor comment - tag your edits as minor only when actually minor (see WP:MINOR). Good luck. David notMD (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you David -- your comments have been very helpful as I work to clarify pieces of the article. I'm looking at the notability guidelines for musicians and ensembles: Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles
The Emigsville Band fits the guidelines for both 1 and 7:
1: "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself."
7: "Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability."
The band has appeared regularly across 3 centuries in news articles from organizations across York County (and these local papers have their own respective Wikipedia pages) that highlight the band's longevity and history -- not just trivial announcements of "upcoming concerts." Further, the band is one of less than 10 community bands from the late 1800's that still exists in the county, making it one of the oldest in the United States. As a county with a population of 450K+, it merits notability based on the aforementioned criteria.
I sincerely appreciate your guidance and will continue to refine the article for revision. Michaelkirk7 (talk) 13:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Emigsville Band has been accepted

edit
 
The Emigsville Band, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 22:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Minor means minor

edit

See WP:MINOR for when to tag edits as minor. David notMD (talk) 02:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unforgettable Big Band (February 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Justlettersandnumbers were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply