Non-rail vehicles (Thomas & Friends)

edit

Hello, Please stop fighting with me over Skiff. Thank you! :) --ACase0000 (talk) 17:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Coconuts (television series)

edit
 

The article Coconuts (television series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any independent, reliable sources about this television series

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mcampany (talk) 01:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

http://signorestudios.blogspot.com/2019/08/coconuts-1990.html?m=1

https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuqpz1abTcXkPCRJeefm3rhtWgoxmceBc

Proof. RWS1995 (talk) 01:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cog's Hollow moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Cog's Hollow, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mcampany (talk) 01:14, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bertie the Bat moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Bertie the Bat, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cog's Hollow (November 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curbon7 (talk) 10:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RWS1995! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 10:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Coconuts (TV series)

edit

  Hello, RWS1995. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coconuts (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Cog's Hollow

edit

  Hello, RWS1995. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cog's Hollow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

I have reverted your edit to Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go!. There were two problems. First, leaving sources in your edit comments is not adequate; you must cite your sources in the article itself. More importantly, IMDB is not a reliable source, so cannot be used as evidence in Wikipedia. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 01:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Harrison Chad. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charlie's Climbing Tree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bunyip (Australian TV series)

edit
 

The article Bunyip (Australian TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2017

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 11:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bunyip (Australian TV series) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bunyip (Australian TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunyip (Australian TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 22:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

1994 in New Zealand TV

edit

Hey, Would you able to fill you the information that happened to NZ TV in 1994? Villian Factman (talk) 10:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plasmo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lift Off.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of programs broadcast by Knowledge Network, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 14:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello.
If you go to Newspapers.com and type in "Tiny Tales" and specifically look in British Columbia between 1990 and 1993 then you'll find it. I also have a few listings downloaded. MichaelSth1995 (talk) 14:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please cite sources when adding content to articles - the onus is on the editor adding content to providing sourcing for it and ideally other editors shouldn't have to hunt down your sources. Waxworker (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply