Welcome!

edit
Hello, MichaelSteinman, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

February 2015

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Anna rezan has been reverted.
Your edit here to Anna rezan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/annarezankritseli/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Explanation: Many articles on wikipedia contained tones of external links with people's social media,I didn't and actually could not be aware of the fact that those are not welcome.

Speedy deletion nomination of Anna rezan

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anna rezan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aerospeed (Talk) 04:10, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Anna Rezan

edit

Thank you for your contributions and work to improve Anna Rezan's page however, you removed the advert tag without giving any explanation. Please explain why you are removing the tag when the page reads like an advertisement. Meatsgains (talk) 02:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Then you (Meatsgains for your comments.I have been trying to understand your point. Comparing the article to articles of similar pages about people in similar fields,i could not find something in,that "reads like an advertisement".Every phrase written came thought out interviews that are citated below the article.An ad would be to mention someone as beautiful instead of a model(profession).Or to name some successful or even talented.The fact that their film was a success is not advertising.Thank you.

The tag refers the page's current promotional tone. Below are a few examples:

  • Her debut song "Let there be rain"...
  • ...and made her catwalk debut as a high fashion model in New York Fashion Week in 2013.
  • ...by the Greek veteran director Nikos Perakis.
  • Her noteworthy appearance of the year though...
  • ...in Fokion Bogris gangster feature film Katharsi
  • ...an organization that is dedicated in ending the stigma of addictions

All the promotional language needs to be trimmed from the page for the tag to be resolved and removed. Hope this helps clear things up a bit. Meatsgains (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MichaelSteinman, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

FuriouslySerene (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply