Welcome!

edit

Hello, MeKinkya, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Prasad Vasant Sutar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Melcous (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Prasad Vasant Sutar

edit

The article Prasad Vasant Sutar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Melcous (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Melcous (talk) I think page is properly sourced now. how to remove the {{prod blp}} tag ? Please help

Speedy deletion of "Deepak Rane"

edit

Deepak Rane, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 12:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

FoCuS Please review the article. need your help. i have added some reliable sources to this article.

Speedy deletion nomination of Pritam Kagne

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pritam Kagne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:38, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Zackmann08: Hi I am very much new to the wikipedia article creation. you have nominated one of my contribution Pritam Kagne for speedy deletion. As far as my knowledge i have sourced links very much reliable sources. still if you suggest about what to include to prove the importance of this person on wikipedia. awaiting your positive feedback and i wish you guys will help me to keep this article permanent on Wikipedia. Thank You.

August 2016

edit

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of Borg 13:00, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Anand Official

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Nikhil Anand Official, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lourdes 12:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Anand Official

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Anand Official, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 07:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikhil Anand Official

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Anand Official, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Nikhil Anand Official, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. A picture of a dead fish (talk) 10:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

~~(talk) Sorry for that, i really new for the wikipedia but the article which i have created are established personalities from the Marathi and Bollywood Industry. So i agree that technically there are some flaws from my side but all articles are of famous personality and they deserve to be on Wikipedia Community

Editing using multiple accounts

edit

Please read WP:SOCK.I am also placing a similar note at User talk:202.179.71.254. AllyD (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Congrats... You created your Teahouse profile!

edit
  Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Don't worry you still shall be awarded this


Speedy deletion nomination of Elevate Dance Institute

edit

Hello MeKinkya,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Elevate Dance Institute for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:14, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 11:12, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MeKinkya (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

You created an article named Nikhil Anand Official that was pure WP:advertisement. It also looks like WP:autobiography. It contained phrases like Passionate Indian Dancer, redefined dance dynamics, and earned the sobriquet “GURU OF CONTEMPORARY DANCE”. Have you ever seen an encyclopedia which uses such language? It would not be such a problem if you created such an article once, but you created the same article three times, although it was deleted every time and you were warned to stop it. You also created several other articles that were pure advertising (Deepak Rane, Prasad Vasant Sutar). You were warned each time to stop using Wikipedia for advertising, but you kep doing so for months. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Admin, I value your decision of blocking me. I am really a new contributor and i dont want forcefully to create articles on Wikipedia. Before this Elevate Dance Institute Deletion i have created 4 articles and Edited more than 5 to 6 articles and i have learned something new in Each article creation process, I dont think i have done any disruptive editing as far as Elevate Dance Institute , i have properly used reliable sources for this article. below is the list of sources. Now i know this web links are not sufficient for Wikipedia but as a new editor and Wikipedia member i would love to have more chance to explore and write some good quality articles. For every new article i have taken reference of present approved articles from the same vertical so for Elevate Dance Institute I have take reference of Arya Dance Academy. before this, Wikipedia Contributors on Wiki Live help channel have given approval on same stated web links which i have stated below for Elevate Dance Institute. I would just want to say I am new contributor but dont want to violate Wikipedia policy. requesting you to guide me rather directly blocking. Awaiting your positive feedback.

Web Links for Elevate Dance Institute Which is has been approved by Wikipedia Live help Channel. DNA Paper Link[1] DNA Paper Link2[2] Jagran[3] DNA Paper[4] NMTv[5] Institute Official Site [6]

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MeKinkya (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello Team, I am very much new to Wikipedia Community and i have not done this purposely. all articles which i have created are of notable personalities and they deserve to be on Wikipedia Community, I have always created or edited articles based on references available on Wikipedia itself. And recently i wanted to create article for Elevate Dance Institute and approval for the same is given by Wikipedia contributors on live help chat. Team , i want to write articles and want to become a notable contributor on Wikipedia.Please give me solution over this which will help me to remove this block.My way is wrong but my objective is right.

Decline reason:

You say you have always created or edited articles based on references "available on Wikipedia itself". I'm not sure what you mean by the availability, but Vanjagenije pointed out specific examples of highly inappropriate content that you added and that were not based on any reliable third-party sources. Repeating your claim after the problems have been pointed out to you shows that you do not understand what kinds of sources Wikipedia requires and that you would repeat your problematic conduct if you were unblocked. Huon (talk) 22:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MeKinkya (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Oaky, I understand it. but how to resolve this problem.

Decline reason:

You need to convince us that you understand the prolems with your edits and will not repeat them. In addition, you should give us a general idea of what edits you will make if unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, MeKinkya. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Deepak Rane for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepak Rane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Rane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PravinGanechari (talk) 11:46, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply