Your submission at Articles for creation: Rochenda Sandall (April 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, MattHucke! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rochenda Sandall (April 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 15:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rochenda Sandall edit

Hi, I've tried to help out with the article by adding a bit of content and replacing some references from sources that are not regarded as reliable. Let me know if I can assist further. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 18:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! It reads much better now. I'm not really an active editor here, so I didn't know what to expect with the process. I think it looks good, but will wait a bit to see if it catches anyone's eye before resubmitting. I definitely think she's notable, as a series regular (albeit for just one season) of an extremely popular show. MattHucke(t) 23:50, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rochenda Sandall edit

  Hello, MattHucke. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rochenda Sandall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rochenda Sandall edit

 

Hello, MattHucke. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rochenda Sandall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: University of Illinois Chicago indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 14:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply