MasterControlMaster13, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi MasterControlMaster13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ben Kinchlow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evangelist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 26 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salem Media Group, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Talk Radio and WMCA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 10 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgia Championship Wrestling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mid-Atlantic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in WFAN (AM), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hi MasterControlMaster13! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at WNYM that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:25, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hi MasterControlMaster13! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at WMCA (AM) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Please provide reliably sourced citations for your edits.Or discuss on the talk page before editing if you need help. BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in WNYM. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

What in the world are you talking about? MasterControlMaster13 (talk) 07:35, 4 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Likely the overabundance of hatnotes for 'for current/past use of calls, see...'. The top shouldn't be that top-heavy with hatnotes or unlikely queries (outside a few readers from the 1930s, everyone else knows WKBD as a Detroit TV station). I did restore your WMCA updates. But, since you did declare a WP:COI as a Salem employee, I must drop the below template; please don't take it personally, it's what is required to edit here. Nate (chatter) 21:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, MasterControlMaster13. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page WMCA (AM), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Your edits complied with the last line and I'm sure you understand those limits. Nate (chatter) 21:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 20 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Route 6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 87.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 8 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pine Tar Incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 14 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don Imus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHK.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Hi MasterControlMaster13! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at WVBN (FM) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 04:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hi MasterControlMaster13! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at WOR (AM) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 22:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at WOR (AM), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. BlueboyLINY (talk) 22:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@BlueboyLINY I don't know what your problem with me is, and I really don't care. But to label me as a "disruptive editor" when all I have done is make consistent, factual, structually- and grammatically-correct edits–and threaten me with a block–is going too far.
Are you mad because I'm a better editor than you are? I don't know, but I would rather you air your gripes with me one-on-one first. MasterControlMaster13 (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
@BlueboyLINY And another thing: you don't own these pages (such as WVBN or WOR (AM)) based on your background. I currently work in radio/TV and have a broad wealth of historical knowledge. So I can accuse you of violating Wikipedia:OWN. Except I'm not that petty. Think about that. MasterControlMaster13 (talk) 22:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for reaching out to me with your concerns. As a fellow Broadcaster (since 1972), and Wikipedia editor (since 2011), and someone who respects your years of experience, as I would hope for you to respect my 50 years of experience, I understand your frustration with being labeled as a "disruptive editor." However, I would like to clarify that this label is not a personal attack on you, but rather a response to certain actions or behaviors that have been observed on Wikipedia.
While I appreciate your attempt at consistent, factual, and structurally- and grammatically-correct edits, it is important to keep in mind that Wikipedia operates under a set of guidelines and policies that are in place to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the content on the platform. If there are any issues with your editing, it is because they have been brought to your attention in the spirit of improving the quality of the content.
As for the threat of a block, please understand that this is not a personal attack but rather a standard protocol for enforcing Wikipedia policies. I would be happy to discuss any specific issues or concerns you have with your editing, but it is important to approach these conversations with an open mind and a willingness to work collaboratively towards the common goal of improving the accuracy and reliability of Wikipedia.
Regarding the accusation of violating Wikipedia:OWN, it's important to note that no editor owns any page on Wikipedia. All pages are open to editing by anyone, and every editor should strive to collaborate with others to improve the accuracy and quality of the content.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, and please feel free to reach out if you have any questions or concerns. - BlueboyLINY (talk) 02:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023 edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to WHDH (TV). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 19:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Merv Griffin Show. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 02:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Merv Griffin Show, you may be blocked from editing. BlueboyLINY (talk) 00:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at The Merv Griffin Show shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BlueboyLINY (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MasterControlMaster13 reported by User:BlueboyLINY (Result: ). Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 02:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply