Mahesh Karve
Welcome Mahesh Karve!
I'm Vincentvikram, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Vikram Vincent 17:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
No. Only those references which are unreliable and have nothing to do with the content have been removed. I read the sources before doing anything.
Source edit
The source isn't relevant. The source doesn't have most of the information that you are referring to. Please remove it. Akshaypatill (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Let me cross-check and we could find a solution together instead of wiping out content.
That would be great. Akshaypatill (talk) 09:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
And before reporting warring, please check out the reverting rules. The number 7 clearly states that "Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Wikipedia's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy' is exempted from the the edit-warring policy. Akshaypatill (talk) 09:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
I did check that and that's why I gave you the warning. In the Award section, you removed the reference as well as one award. I checked and it was a reliable source which clearly stated that the concerned party received that award. Once again please go through the content, references thoroughly. We have to maintain this platform's dignity. I know the rules I do not engage in something without being sure.
Show me the referance edit
The source that was cited refers to 'Efficient MLA' and not to 'the Award for Outstanding Scholarly Speaker in the Legislature on behalf of Dainik Lokmat' nor 'Powerful Politician Award on behalf of Dainik Lokmat'. I have removed 'the Award for Outstanding Scholarly Speaker in the Legislature on behalf of Dainik Lokmat' as I couldn't find any source and I doubt if such an award exists. Also the source you revered doesn't confirm if he got the award or not. It just says 'to receive' and I can't find any source that implies otherwise. so, mate, check the source yourself and then bother me. I hope you aren't cognitively impaired and you understand what you are talking about and I ain't wasting my time here. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaypatill (talk • contribs) 18:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
To receive- And he did received. Now I haven't made any changes but you seem very spiteful when there is no need. Remember we are still discussing. If you want to use insulting language we are never going to make this work. I do not entertain bullies. I am talking to you in a respectful manner and I wish you at least could be friendly. If not then it will hinder my process of finding sources. Would love to share that too once you are civilized enough.
I had to write all this because you claimed many times that the source supports the content and it wasn't true. I don't want to waste my time looking for the claimed content in the source. First, check and then add the source . Anyway, you have got the warning and content has reverted by the Admin and I hope you will follow the rules in future. Akshaypatill (talk) 07:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
I am following the rules which is why I am seeking help from the administrative board. Your good intentions do not justify your usage of insulting language. I am still being respectful so please refrain from doing the same in the future. I still would like to work together but, editing and putting information on Wikipedia cannot be about someone's ego. If I have made any mistakes I am going to make them right. I think it will be best if we talk on the concerned article's talk page instead of on my talk page. Best Wishes to you! Mahesh Karve (talk) 07:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC) Mahesh
February 2021 edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dhananjay Munde. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 02:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Your post regarding Dhananjay Munde edit
Hello. You are now autoconfirmed and should be able to post to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (AN/I). I've moved your post from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Non-autoconfirmed posts to AN/I. Please notify any other editors concerned with this by posting {{subst:ANI-notice}} on their talk pages, and sign your posts with four tildes ~~~~. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Dhananjay Munde (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- VedikaThorat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- A post by VedikaThorat claiming to know what Mr. Munde wants in his article
- WP:Sockpuppet investigations/VedikaThorat
Hello Mahesh Karve. Your account has been reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VedikaThorat. It seems that you and VedikaThorat (talk · contribs) might be the same person, or perhaps two people working in close collaboration. The policy concerned is WP:SOCK. It would help if you can clarify your off-wiki relationship with VedikaThorat (talk · contribs). The two of you are both new accounts and have been making similar edits to Dhananjay Munde. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, EdJohnston
I have explained/clarified this to Vincentvikram as well, I do know Vedika. However, I did not write anything in the Dhananjay Munde article but I did restore some content. I have also discussed this with other editors and asked them for help. The concerned article still lacks some information. I am in the process of finding new sources. I understand your concerns. Thank you for contacting me.