Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, LordBapou! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


Hello Dan Arndt,
My article does not have enough sources because its a fairly new invention that is being process for a Non-Provisional Utility patent Application (NPPA). I have in my possession multiple legal documents covering the innovation which can be use as reference but will be difficult to put it in link form. I can provide Wikipedia with the necessary documents to past the verification and legitimation stage of my article. Please advise as I'm new in creating a Wikipedia page.
LordBapou LordBapou (talk) 04:38, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

LordBapou, based on your commentary above it would appear that you have a significant conflict of interest, in that you are trying to use Wikipedia to promote an innovation that you are developing, which is self promotion. The general principles of Wikipedia is to write articles on notable topics. If your innovation is noteworthy then it should be written by someone who has no connection to the topic, that way there is no biases and it is not seem as advertising or promotion. A clear test of a subject's notability is if there is significant coverage of the subject in multiple independent secondary sources. Which by your own admission doesn't seem to be the case. Good luck and ahppy editing. Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Watatisation (December 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Watatisation

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Watatisation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://inventoraccount.inventionhome.com/amPPA.aspx?TFN=457N43165PI906177S1685. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:LordBapou/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:LordBapou/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://site-sfpbbshn.dotezcdn.com/uploads/f966a2acc8bd449aa8ac8b6d0ebfda6d.pdf?v=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 23:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:LordBapou/sandbox

edit

  Hello, LordBapou. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:LordBapou/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply