Lokato

Lokato, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lokato! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

List of countries by literacy rate

Hello Lokato, thanks for updating the table. Unfortunately, I've put the article back to the CIA's data, since the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics seems to give very varying figures year by year (http://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2014/09/07/jugglery-with-literacy-rate). UNISEF put it at 59% for 2009-2013 and the CIA at 61.5 for 2015. Additionally the sources do not state how it was recorded. The rest of the countries listed were estimates for people aged 15 and over who can read and write in 2015. This makes the data less comparable. Thanks, Jolly Ω Janner 02:52, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry i have got the real information in 2015 from CRI publication and i think those links are bias. i got it from realiable sources sorry if you dont beleie but check this out.(http://cri.org.bd/publication/2015/Bangladesh%20Education%20for%20All/#/1/). Anyways i think those were some bias report this report tell the actual literacy rate.

The introduction for this report seems very bias towards the incumbent government of Bangladesh: "As a result, Bangladesh has witnessed tremendous progress" and again it does not state where the 71% statistic came from or how it defines literacy rate. Why do you not prefer the CIA figure? It's from 2015 as well. Jolly Ω Janner 03:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Because its an CRI Publication i think CIA does not tell the reality anways i given real facts!!

As neither of us can agree on which data to use and you continue to edit the article with the CRI's data, I have moved out discussion to Talk:List of countries by literacy rate#Disputed data for Bangladesh and requested a third opinion. Jolly Ω Janner 05:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

• Please see Talk:List of countries by literacy rate#Disputed data for Bangladesh where a third opinion from ONUnicorn has suggested using multiple columns to include data from different sources. We would both very much appreciate your thoughts on going forward with this method. Jolly Ω Janner 02:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

There is another message for you at Talk:List of countries by literacy rate#Disputed data for Bangladesh. Jolly Ω Janner 04:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of countries by literacy rate. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Multiple editors have attempted to address your concerns about the Bangladesh literacy rate at the article talk page. Please engage in the discussion there rather than asserting ownership and editing against consensus. Worldbruce (talk) 03:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at List of countries by literacy rate

You've been reported for edit warring at WP:AN3#User:‎Lokato reported by User:Jolly Janner (Result: ). You can respond there if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your above statement "Because its an CRI Publication i think CIA does not tell the reality anways i given real facts!!" suggests you may be unwilling to accept CIA publications, which are widely used on Wikipedia. It seems you may be editing so as to make the Bangladesh literacy numbers look better. This puts in question your ability to edit neutrally on Wikipedia. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't understand your response on my talk page. But you can avoid a block if you will agree to wait for talk page consensus before changing the article again. EdJohnston (talk) 20:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Well i put the perfect data which shows the actual literacy rate from 2006-2015 i dont know how much can i prove to you. The CIA does give the actual literacy rate from 2006-2015.

The complaint at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:‎Lokato reported by User:Jolly Janner (Result: Warned) has been closed with a warning to you. If you make any further edits at List of countries by literacy rate which appear to be non-neutral you may be blocked by any administrator. If you truly question whether a source is usable for our purposes, you can open a request at WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. You've made a few statements that I actually don't understand, but there is not enough of a problem to justify a block at this time. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Adding unsourced sections that are already covered in sub articles

Stop adding material that (1) isn't supported by a reliable source and (2) clearly does not belong in the main article. We already have a Economy of Bangladesh article which covers specific industries and is linked from the main article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

I did not vandalize wikipedia it was on wikipedia what i wrote just put it back

Your edits have been reverted because you don't seem to understand our WP:UNDUE, WP:RS and Wikipedia:Article_size policies. Until you do, please discuss changes on the article's talk page. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh ok but this article was already on Wikipedia why di you take it out. I did put a good source actually. Its what exactly the article said.

Edit warring with multiple accounts

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Well i gave the right text i dont know which one you giving on. i gave eatly what the sources said

There are obvious issues with WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT (you've been repeatedly told that the material you're adding is not appropriate for the articles you are adding it to) and that your English is problematic (WP:CIR). Please consider focusing on the Wikipedia for your native language. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC) Hey ive understood everything fine im very sorry for the disruptive editing!!Can you please unblock me now since i have understood everything now!!!!