User talk:Jolly Janner
|This is Jolly Janner's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Jolly Janner.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5|
ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated
<font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
'''<font color="#00824A">[[User:Jolly Janner|Jolly]]</font> <font color="#2A5FFF">[[Special:Contributions/Jolly Janner|Ω]]</font> <font color="#00824A">[[User talk:Jolly Janner|Janner]]</font>''': Jolly Ω Janner
'''[[User:Jolly Janner|<span style="color: #00824A">Jolly</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Jolly Janner|<span style="color: #2A5FFF">Ω</span>]] [[User talk:Jolly Janner|<span style="color: #00824A">Janner</span>]]''': Jolly Ω Janner
Orphaned non-free image File:Office for National Statistics logo.pngEdit
Thanks for uploading File:Office for National Statistics logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
DYK nom with title in dispute?Edit
Hi, I've recently expanded the article Skylab mutiny, but there is a lengthy discussion about the title of the article on its talk page. I'd like to make a nomination within the 7-day window, but realizing that the title is apt to go through a 30-day RfC shortly. Do you know of precedent? -- ke4roh (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Ke4roh: Nominate the article and point out that the title is in dispute. Given the amount of noms waiting for review, there is a good chance the dispute will be resolved before the nom is reviewed. I see a different problem though: The article had 6329 characters of readable prose before your expansion and now has 26663 characters of readable prose, so you are 4982 characters short of a 5x expansion and thus not eligible anyway. Regards SoWhy 10:13, 28 August 2018 (UTC)