Welcome!

Hello, Livonia ainovil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Livonia ainovil! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ragazzi di Livonia (February 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ragazzi di Livonia (February 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SITH (talk) 18:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ragazzi di Livonia (February 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by G.scaringi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gianvito Scaringi (talk) 23:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Ragazzi di Livonia has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ragazzi di Livonia. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ragazzi di Livonia (April 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoolSkittle was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CoolSkittle (talk) 14:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Courtesy to Reviewers edit

The following is a copy of my reply to you:

First, did you read the notice at the top of my talk page, that says that I do not usually follow your submission through the approval process? It has been about six weeks since I declined your draft, and I have not researched it fully, but my recollection is that I posted to the Teahouse, which is where you should be asking for advice. There are many drafts waiting to be reviewed, and simply yelling louder is not the most effective way to get your draft reviewed. I suggest that you ask for advice at the Teahouse again. I also suggest that you read in Wikipedia, there is no deadline and learn to be patient. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I am posting it here as a non-template warning to you that discourtesy to reviewers, such as demanding a quick re-review, may result in a block. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ragazzi di Livonia edit

 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Ragazzi di Livonia, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 03:51, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Added note: I can't imagine why you would cite a research paper on the crusades in Italian to support a claim about petty crime in the US, except to try to trick us into accepting an article about a made up subject. And last I checked, Detroit Free Press didn't publish articles on Scribd. If you think this is a mistake, you can contest the deletion proposal. Otherwise, please stop trying to write about topics with fake sources. signed, Rosguill talk 03:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)Reply