User talk:Livelikemusic/Talk Page Archive 3

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Musicfreak7676 in topic Actors & Actresses Status

Re edit

Heya MF. I think they must have noticed it looks better with a main link to the individual cast lists, because well they've left it as it is. Good call on getting rid of the clutter. :)Rain the 1 15:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. It ended disputes with who should and shouldn't be listed. Besides, it was until such member came along all cast members were linked. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Non-free files in your user space edit

  Hey there Musicfreak7676, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Musicfreak7676/Kate Howard.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.
  • If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

Hi MF. I know im banned (which i don't understand, as i have removed a comment from the top of my talk page because i see it as immature) but anyway i've made a sandbox (as the Y&R minor characters page is way too long) of Y&R characters from 2011, and it consists of characters that were introduced/ or re-introduced (Like Ricky Williams) in 2011. I was wondering if you would like to help. SoapJar21 Talk To Me 12:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I haven't removed it because I've been a tad bit busy in my own life to personally even care about removing it. And I'd actually enjoy helping; I've been researching some of the characters in the spare time I've been having. I can start helping tomorrow as tonight I am going out with family and have other things to handle before leaving. Thank you for the invite, and for anything that's happened in the past, it's in the past. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


Hi there. I apologize for my comments on SoapJar's talk page. I'm sorry if I offended you. :( Creativity97 (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's fine, I just wish you could have come to me and told me, I would've understood and wanting to work it out with you. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 21:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at Farine's talk page.
Message added 05:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

hi edit

hi. I saw you made a sandbox for the 3rd Info-box. I can't wait to see it materialize its exciting. Please tell me when you have any new info on it as i would love to see it/help. SoapJar21 Talk To Me 11:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I added a lot of new sections like "Martial Status" "Spouse" "Previous Marriages" etc. It's completely re-organized, etc. I'm excited for everyone to see it!! I just have to figure out how to get it coded since there's no code yet for "Infobox 3" LOL. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
That sounds good. I don't think you need 'spouse' & 'marital status' because they are the same thing. I hope to see it :) also about the pages i made, i hope you can help out with the Sandbox on my user page (it says Y&R characters 2009) in helping me change and cut short the storylines because nobody has buged an inch for me where the text is considered lol. :) thankyou MF!!! SoapJar21 Talk To Me 20:45, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I can definitely divulge into those pages in a while. I'm trying to concentrate on getting the third infobox up once I can get the coding to show up. I quite like the current set-up I have been working on and think you could as well. And I will definitely help you with those pages when I get a free minute. :) Musicfreak7676 (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou!! :) I hope you do. I don't mind about the current pages (2010, 2011) i just really want help with the ones that are still in my sandboxes from 2008 & 2009. Can't wait to see that project you are working on for the info-box ;) SoapJar21 Talk To Me 21:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Hi MF:)). I think I'm finished the 2009 characters page if you are interested :). I just need to be granted some sort of permission for the Emily (stupid character) merge. Here the page is, its very ready to move (only has 16 references/sources for now, but thats okay i feel, do u think thats enough?) [1] - SoapJar21 Talk To Me 22:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Actually i just realized there are only 5 characters i don't think thats enough..i really couldn't think of anybody else. :/ And nobody bugged an inch to help me with the page or the storylines and creativity hasn't edited it as well. Anyway do you know of any other MAJOR characters from 2009? please let me know!!! :D thanks. SoapJar21 Talk To Me 22:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I will get to all of this during the weekend, I have a busy few days ahead of me. But I will take care of those things. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Genevieve YR.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Genevieve YR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Harmony YR.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Harmony YR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Avery YR.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Avery YR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Angelo YR.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Angelo YR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Angelina YR.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Angelina YR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:33, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Normal 025.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Normal 025.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Episode count edit

You said that in the Days Of Our Lives template that episode # 11754 was aired Wed Jan 11 2012. I know better in this case, and the number is actually 11755, i.e. episode # 11755 was aired Wed Jan 11 2012 not 11754. Please don't change that. Wingard (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The internet states otherwise though. Including a magazine listing.Rain the 1 00:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Um, no your episode count is wrong. You do not know better in this case, and also, please do not place your "talk" in the middle of someone elses. Thank you. Also, do not remove the comas, dates/episode counts include comas. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why do you need comas? It looks much better w/o Wingard (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

No it actually doesn't. And just because you think it looks better doesn't mean we should do it. Dates include comas, and any number over 999 include them as well. It's how it's done, please don't try and change it. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 18:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Never seen any comas in dates b4, so please stop inserting them!!!Wingard (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

THEY'VE ALWAYS BEEN THERE!!!! THEY'RE IN DATES!!! And type properly, seeing :"b4" is classless. Stop removing them! They're proper grammar. You've been reported and I'll continually do it. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 18:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at MegastarLV's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wingard edit

Blocked for the usual 24 hours for edit warring. We'll see what effect this has.

As for the template thing, I would just take an existing similar character template and copy it into a new page in template namespace, then make the changes you want. Do you need some more hands-on help? Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Unfortunately, I do not think 24 hours is going to be enough of a block time. I won't be online tomorrow, so I can't stop them. And I'd probably need a more hands-on help. Because I tried creating a brand-new template for soap characters, and it doesn't work. =/ Musicfreak7676 (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Looks like he got blocked again (Don't worry, I doubt you would have been blocked as it seems you were in the right). If this happens a third time, it will be indefinite.

OK, show me a model for the template you want to create. Daniel Case (talk) 01:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I just didn't want to be blocked Daniel for trying to be in the right. And the template I want to create is the Template:Infobox_soap_character template, but with different modifications of my own choice. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Looks like Wingard is now gone for good. Daniel Case (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Heyy edit

Hey thanks for your message :). How is the infobox going? Thankyou I'm not trying to bother you with my requests its just a i feel a little alone with the pages lol :). AND YES! How stupid was the sex tape? lol. So who do you think did it? There are 3 people involved now Adam, Patty & Deacon. Its either Adam & Patty teamed up or Deacon alone - because when Patty saw Deacon she ran, which means they probs don't have anything in common lol. I also created 2 knew pages btw. One for 2008 (please have a look, tell me what u think) and for 2012. I hope nobody deletes the 2012 thing because new content will be added eventually. Thanks :) SoapJar21 TALK? 19:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

You're not bothering me, it's just a hectic time for me right now, aha. I have some personal things going on so my time to Wikipedia is a tad bit limited, and then when idiots go and try to do things their way, like removing commas from airdates, it gets tidious. And the sextape was an insult to Diane and Maura West. I think it's Patty/Deacon. I don't think Adam killed her. As per individual year pages, I honestly don't seem them as a purpose. I'd rather see 1970s/1980s/1990s/2000s/2010s, you know what I mean? Merge one year into a ten year pages, less chances of them being removed. Just my two-cents.
The infobox is coming along, I'm trying to get it coded so it works and shows up like I want it to, it's quite difficult but I'm excited to show it. :D Hope your day is going swimmingly! Musicfreak7676 (talk) 19:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I don't think Adam killed her but he is involved in something with Patty. My goal is to make pages from 2000, 2001 and over. But under 2000, i want to make it into decades as there aren't enough characters or information. Thankyou excited to see the page. Yes i'm busy to finding sources etc. :) These pages aren't easy there is a lot of cleaning up, re-writing etc. Alot lol :) Also i have a funny feeling Ronan might be killed. I don't know..its just that he is leaving and in the preview for the next episode he seemed in danger. - SoapJar21 TALK? 20:23, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Adam, I think, brought Patty back to town and in-turn, show that he killed her. I mean, Patty has the syringe, no one else had it in their possession. I don't know, I think decades is enough. Because what if one year doesn't have enough characters to put onto a page? What then? I think decades are fine. Per Ronan, I don't think he'll be killed. It sucks that he's leaving again. And I will definitely dive into the pages over the weekend, I promise. You can leave me as many messages as you need on my page tomorrow and on Saturday, I will answer ALL of them!! BTW, hope you don't mind, I copied and edited your signature to fit me. I'll edit it more this weekend. :D MusicFreak7676 TALK? 20:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well i think even if there are 7 notable characters from a certain year, its ok to have that on a single page if it correctly sourced and well written. Y&R is just so boring. There was potential to write this storyline so much better. And firstly, this storyline (Diane dying) shouldn't have occurred anyway. MAB and her hack writers can't write worth a darn. I'm not sure about Ronan. But i hope he returns, he isn't particularly interesting but god damn sexy lol. I really hope MAB gets hit by a truck and goes to hospital forEVER so that somebody else could write the show. She ruined it lol. Yes i noticed about the signature because of the TALK with a question mark ?. lol thats fine i don't mind raintheone was the one who did mine for me :). SoapJar21 TALK? 23:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I don't know, I feel like if there's seven from one year, and two from another that they should just be merged in a decade. I don't know, just my opinion. Moving on, MAB definitely can't construct a show. She pulled our leg for months concerning MTS/Nikki, and then firing MW/Diane and hiring these AMC alums. While that doesn't bother me, it upsets me. MAB is only on the reign because she is related to Bill Bell by marriage of a child of his. It's quite disturbing. And Ronan is a beefcake, I can't lie. And yeah, sorry about that. I plan on tweaking my signature over the week. :D MusicFreak7676 TALK? 23:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


OMG! (SPOILER ALERT IF U HAVENT HEARD THE LATEST) HOW DARE MAB DO THAT TO NIKKI! She made Nikki a pysco insane freak! I can't believe Nikki killed Diane. the storyline also doesn't make sense - even though Nikki is bigger, diane is WAY tougher then Nikki and could have easily knocked her out! I can't believed they summed down the Great Diane's death as "Self Defense" as in Diane was the attacker. Its horrible. MAB deserves to be hit on the head 10+ times and die LOL. And you know i love Sharon lol she told Nikki off definitely! LOL "You are a drunk and you are married to a bar person" lol i love Sharon. She will have much security with Victor. She is golden & untouchable - YAY! WHat are your thoughts? Urgh i was really hoping that Patty did it. The footage was awful! (Of Nikki using "self defense" against Diane). Its just terrible. I can't talk. Well im ranting but i can't talk lol. I NEED YOUR INPUT ON THIS AWFUL SITUATION!!!!!!! HOW DARE THEY DO THAT TO DIANE! Just make her the criminal and Nikki a hero. Its terrible URGHHH. SoapJar 12:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

SAW THE EPISODE!! HAVE TO RESPOND TO THIS AS SOON AS I GOT ONLINE TODAY!!! First off, how they handled the new scenes with "Diane" was insulting to Maura West and if I were her, I'd be pissed like I know she is. Secondly, though I am happy at the resolution of this 5-6 month Diane murder storyline, I don't like how they pinned it on Nikki, especially on self-defense. I wanna do what Nikki did to Diane to MAB. That lady cannot tell a good storyline. Unfortunately, Diane will always be the Villian. At least now, from now on, they gotta use Maura West as the backdrop for flashbacks or ghost-like images, aha. ALSO! I called that Nikki killed Diane from the moment someone popped up in Jack's window when Diane last tried to seduce Jack!
As per Sharon— I don't know. I love "Shictor" but I'd much rather have Victor and Nikki back together. "Shictor" which I called since '07 just seem wrong. He's like a father figure. Sharon needs to stay single and be her own woman. My question is: what the f**k did Patty have to do with it? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

EXACTLY ITS AN INSULT TO DIANE AS A CHARACTER AND MAURA WEST! I am not happy with the outcome. Its terrible and stupid. Because Nikki already confessed - its obvious she was right. I wasn't shocked just disappointed. MAB sucks! I Hope Y&R drops from #1 Soap so MAB will be like "O sh*t" lol. About "Shictor" i don't even view them as a legit couple. Ive been watching since they call it the "Shick Days" and Victor is a TOTAL father figure and i nearly THREW UP when i saw them kiss - its like incest lol. Secretly i will always want Nick and Sharon to be endgame (and if MAB doesn't make them endgame when the show ends, she is dead). They have history that can't be compared to people like Phyllis and Adam. Even Phyllis and Adam know DEEP down that they will end up together. I really don't give a damn about Nikki. I've hated her a long time as she hates Sharon. She is the show's biggest hypocrit - as much as i don't like to say it (because i love Taylor, my fav character on B&B, but she is a major hypocrit) Nikki is Y&R's Taylor. She walks around acting like shes the best when she was a stripper and hooker who grew up WORSE then Sharon and she gets jumpy at anybody who seems like she did. And i didn't watch during the Victor & Nikki golden days in the 1980s and the 1990s when they were married to others but were still in love (like Nick and Sharon from 2007-2009) so i don't know i've just seen Youtube scenes. But Melody Thomas Scott is a wonderful Soap Diva! Nothing against her. I love Sharon i don't mind her with Adam. He truly cares despite this past faults (not faults, crimes lol). But Nick is just endgame even tho i hate his ass. Anyway i hope Chelsea sticks around people like her are good because i loved her on AMC!

I feel agnostic watching old soap videos. They were so good back then! They came up with creative storylines. I also miss classic DOOL - a person being kidnapped everyweek etcetc and the EVIL DiMeras! AMAZING. and Y&R too. They used to write good but then MAB came along..and ruined it. SoapJar 18:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

MAB has really destroyed the series, and turned it into a mockery. Michelle Stafford even said in an interview she'd love to have sex in a bed for once, and hoped the writers and MAB saw it. I want "Shick" as endgame as well, when they briefly reunited I was sososososososo happy, especially with Cassie's wish coming true. Phyllis and Adam, to be blunt, need to just f**k like wild animals. I know they want to, I saw the chemistry since Michael Muhney took the role over.
Oh, Nikki is to the Taylor of Y&R. Taylor is the biggest hypocrite; Thomas blackmailed Brooke and torn her marriage apart and never apologized for Brooke for it. Hell, Taylor slept with Rick!! How hypocritical of her. Taylor has been after every single man Brooke has had minus Eric and Grant and Deacon. It's disgusting. Girl has some serious issues, I would never trust her to be my psychiatrist.
Maura didn't care who killed Diane, she tweeted me that she could care less and has no interest. Her final day, she cried leaving the set because of how poorly she was treated by everyone. She was horribly treated and this whole end of the story is disgusting. At least it's over.
Chelsea seems incestuousness to me. Melissa/Billy were brother and sister on AMC so it seems wrong. The show needs less newbies and more vets.
Also, did you hear? Crystal Chappel (Olivia, GL; Maggie, OLTL; Carly, DAYS) may join B&B as a Kristen recast? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thats fascinating! That Maura West didn't care - good on her. I feel so sorry for her :(. Thats a terrible thing. MAB sucks. Maura is a lovely actress and will be appreciated elsewhere i just hope and pray that she can keep her soap career alive. YES when Shick reunited i was jumping for joy. But MAB is TRYING to convince us that Adam & Sharon are the "ultimate Love" like she is trying to convince us that Rafe & Sami are meant to be together - when she belongs with E.J./Lucas. As for Taylor; she has been a hypocrit (its clear to me) in recent years (2009-). But before she was such a smart sophisticated person. And as a Tridge fan and a person who watched during the Tridge days, it was evident then that Ridge always wanted Taylor but the writers have turned it around. Its stupid. But thats the writer's fault for making her like that. And Nikki they've done the same. They ruined iconic characters. Also i don't think its purpose that Taylor has been with all of Brooke's men- its just that the show don't have enough men so they use Brooke's leftovers for EVERYONE - Katy, Donna, Felicia! Everyone has a bit of Brooke's leftovers lol. And they wouldn't bring it (except Whip, which was a fail) anybody just for the purpose of a romantic relationship for a senior cast member. Also do you have twitter? You can follow me we can chat there!!! --> @SharonCaseFan. :) Yes i know!! omg i think its weird to that they were brother/sister. And i can tell that IF Chelsea stays within a year she and billy will be together. And im looking forward to Chelsea's mum! I love the Dukes of Hazzard. As for Crystal Chappel i would LOVE to see her as Kristen! The old Kristen was boring. And i hate Carly, she was a weak, boring and annoying character and Chappel is a decent actress so she would fair well on B&B. And all of my friends and family (i used to watch Y&R with them) love Sharon. Sharon is such an appealing character - she is beautiful and she just keeps you hooked. SC is a brilliant actress and deserved and Emmy in 2006 & 2009 (2007 & 2010) when Nick left her for Phyllis those scenes were MAGICAL and when she gave birth and learned her child was "Dead" she is amazing. I miss Carly Tenney so much :( I actually don't mind newbies unless they have good storylines. Vets never work out - like with Tristan Rogers (who is now going back to GH) that was a fail! I hope Genevieve sticks around im loving her! SoapJar 15:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Maura spoke out in an interview, saying she knew by Week Two that her time on Y&R was going to be short-lived and when she left the show, only Michael Muhney was nice to her. "Shadam" don't belong, he stole her baby. That alone would make me hate him, no matter how much he was so sexy. LOL. Eh, I love "Safe" together, I cannot stand EJ/Lucas. Per Taylor; she's been a hypocrite a lot, as have Ridge. I don't truly believe "Tridge" belong, no matter how much I watch them for the 16+ years I have. And Whip was a #FAIL. It was merely Rick Herst getting a job since GH dropped him from the cast. And I have Twitter, yes. I am very vocal about soap on it, aha. Every soap I am vocal about. I don't see Chelsea/Billy, I see "Chadam" because I know MCE would love to work more with Adam. Per Crystal; I'm on the fence. They recasted Felicia with a strong actress, and look at how they use her. Once per Christmas, maybe a few holidays inbetween. She wasn't even at Thanksgiving, it's pitiful. Unfortunately, I do not believe SC deserved the award in '07 nor '10. Maura deserved those awards. Aha. Maura had two excellent strong submissions those two years, some of her best work, one she was even pregnant in. Genie Francis is sticking around; she signed a multi-year contract late last year. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Vandal edit

Hi.

It looks like you had trouble reporting a vandal. There is a way to handle that situation, which actually works for me all the time. Would it be alright if I could share some tips? Platinum Star (talk) 03:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there edit

Hi MF ... I was wondering if you could tell me how to change my User name logo to different colors so it appears like that when I sign on talk pages. I just saw you changed yours from plain to colors, could you simply tell me how to do that? Thanks !! Creativity97 (talk) 21:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

What colours do you like? I could maybe make some mock-ups for you? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I like green and purple :) Sure make some mock-ups for me. Thanks Creativity97 (talk) 22:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Creativity97 talk <<<<<< That's what I came up with. You can copy and paste what I typed out and go to My Preferences > Signature and edit how you'd like. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

OMG!!! Thank you so much it's great. If ever need help editing or anything I'm available!! Thanks again !! Creativity97 (talk) 03:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay it didn't work when I copied and pasted it ... all it did was paste "Creativity97 talk". No colors or anything :( Can you get back to me on how to paste it so the colors and everything appears?? Thanks for everything :) Creativity97 talk (talk) 03:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Click the box below when you copy/paste. The box below where you enter the text for your signature customization. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Copy the whole code into the box - which is: [[User:Creativity97|'''<span style="color:#Green;font-family:Century Gothic">Creativity<span style="color:Purple;font-family:Century Gothic">97</span>''']]</sub> <sup>[[User talk:Creativity97|<span style="color:LimeGreen;">talk</span>]]</sup>
Hope that helps.Rain the 1 04:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello again ... neither of those suggestions worked .... all I get when I copy and paste the entire thing in the signature box is just the code in writing, still no colors or anything. I'm really sorry I'm being a bother :( On that aspect I'm not good at that stuff. I really like your design MF and I just want to know how to paste it in my preferences so that it will appear when I sign on pages. If you could get back to me on a more detailed way to get it to work that would be great :) Again I'm sorry I'm such a bother. Thanks !! Creativity97 (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is no other way though - Copy the code exactly how it is shown above - click "My preferences" - scroll down to the "Signature" section - Remove the old text from the box - Paste the new code text into the box - scroll down the page and click "Save".Rain the 1 16:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, go to My Preferences > Signature. Remove the text, paste what I wrote out, then click the box next to this information:
Treat the above as wiki markup. If unchecked, the contents of the box above will be treated as your nickname and link :::automatically to your user page. If checked, the above markup will be used for your name when you sign with MusicFreak7676 TALK! or MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC); :::including any Wiki markup, links, or other valid formatting that it includes. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
You did not need to copy the "< n o w i k i >" part Creativty - just exactly how it appeared on this page.Rain the 1 17:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


Thank you to everyone. MF, very sorry but everything I tried with the signature you made up does not work :( So, I made my own without any bells and whistles, I read a tutorial on signatures and it was VERY helpful. I just wanted a semi-fancy signature like everyone else :P Mine was so dull and boring that it needed some pizazz. Anyway, thank you so much MF and Rain the 1, you have both been so kind in helping me without hesitation. Again, if either of you need help with editing I'm available, let me know. Thanks again !! Creativity97 Talk? 18:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

My code may or may not have been too long, but I'm glad you figured it out. :) MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Don't change before... edit

Please don't change the B & B and Days episode number before they've been uploded on soapoperafan.com respectively CBS The Bold And The Beautiful page. Wingard (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Um yes we can. Once it airs we can, besides, you removed DAYS then re-did it yourself. That's not how it works Wingard. Continually edit war me, I will report you again. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Soapoperafan.com isn't even reliable don't depend on anything there and it shouldn't be used to find knowledge or ANYTHING. SoapJar 19:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at MegastarLV's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at MegastarLV's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at MegastarLV's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello edit

Hi MF ... I switched over to your page as we shouldn't really be having a full conversation on SoapJar's :P Anyway, Wingard wasn't smart to just come on here and mess everything up. You certainly don't deserve to be gone for good. But if you were to leave Wiki, that would be very unfortunate :( I hope that doesn't happen anytime soon. Best wishes :) PS - Good call on Diane's murder BTW! I was in denial that it was Nikki. I wanted it to be Patty; maybe she could've murdered Diane out of rage after seeing Diane naked in Jack's house, like SoapJar said. Anyhow, good prediction !! :) Creativity97 Talk? 22:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I knew it was Nikki because they said Nikki was missing from rehab, that was a red flag. Patty showed up post-murder I believe and took the syringe. It was a horribly kept secret that Nikki killed Diane, putting Patty on the scene didn't deflect it at all. And I'm not leaving, but they nearly pushed me today. I'm not going to stand for someone making such horrific edits under such horrific excuses to win over me, who's contributed a lot to the site and the soap articles. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes i agree because Patty is the only one that would watch someone with Jack (out of Jealousy) lol. I wish it was Patty... Yay your not leaving? Thats good MF!!!!:D SoapJar 22:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

do you have any information on the character "Hunter" that was on the show a few months ago? Or that other character, Selena??? I need info on them..because they need to be credited. SoapJar 22:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hunter and Selena? Who are you? I know a little bit about Hunter and don't find her too central to need a sub-page. All I know is that they were probably both useless, hence their disappearance. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

No..im not making her a sub-article. I just want to credit her (in the 2011 page i've added in smaller appearances). What do you mean Who am I? Im soap jar / Arre lol. True they were useless . SoapJar 22:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I meant "who are they?" aha. Sorry. They were useless people, aha. I only remember Hunter. And there wasn't much to tell. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes i just wanna know what date she arrived :\ SoapJar 23:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The same date Kevin G. Schmidt returned as Noah! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

General Hospital Cast edit

Hey Musicfreak,

Someone seems to have vandalized the cast page for General Hospital after you had fixed it. At your earliest convenience, can you fix it up and notify the person. Thanks. TVFAN24 (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

And you can't do this because? What's wrong with your fingers? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Well I don't want any trouble. TVFAN24 (talk) 23:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

How would you be making trouble? You wouldn't be doing anything wrong, you would've been mixing a proper mistake. Oh well, I did it already. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for getting right on that. TVFAN24 (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, I guess? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

lol you should do it yourself TV Fan. As a courtesy to others. SoapJar 23:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Infobox colors edit

Hello, Musicfreak7676. Do you think you can bring up changing infobox colors at WP:SOAPS first...before making such changes? I noticed that you are changing One Life to Live character articles to black. But black is used for General Hospital. Are you only changing the infoboxes of One Life to Live characters who will be on General Hospital? If so, it's not good to have some of the One Life to Live infoboxes sport blue...while the others sport black. It's also not ideal to have two American soap operas sporting the same color. Flyer22 (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

GH sports a different colour from OLTL and if they're going over, their colour would be replaced, would it not? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
They are still primarily One Life to Live characters. And I just stated that it is not "ideal to have two American soap operas sporting the same color." Your change makes it so that some One Life to Live characters will be sporting blue, while others are sporting black. These infobox colors were selected for each series years ago, and it is better that they be discussed instead of chosen on the whim of any editor. Flyer22 (talk) 23:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hence why I've suggested one universal colour for soap pages, to avoid the confusion because people are going to want to change them since they'll be currently on GH starting next month; that's the only reason I changed them. It wasn't directly on a "whim" either. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
You suggested this at the project? If so, what is the discussion titled so that I may weigh in? If you haven't already brought it up there, then I ask that you follow my suggestion and do so. I'll likely go along with one color for all American soap opera characters, even though there will always be people changing them (with us reverting those changes of course). Flyer22 (talk) 01:22, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I brought it up under the template discussion. I suggested a third soapbox and universal colour theme. I just figured it would lessen the amount of edit wars concerning colours, and if characters were to crossover, there would be no dispute. Because once OLTL characters go to GH, they colour scheme won't be the same just like you said for OLTL. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think you should bring up a new discussion about it, specifically labeled Infobox colors so that others will see. I've been meaning to do that, but have been busy and keep getting sidetracked. Flyer22 (talk) 23:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I will definitely do that!! Thanks for the heads up. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Advice edit

hey i need your advice. Do you think this is a reliable source [2] its from Soaps.com (she knows soaps) which i would never use; but it is an actual interview with Sharon Case (for the [[Sharon Newman article) and she is being interviewed by the site. What do you think? Is it usable? SoapJar 02:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

My opinion on SoapsSheKnows is that it's not reliable. If sites like MichaelFairman/SoapCentral aren't classified as reliable sources, then I don't believe this site nor DaytimeConfidential should be. I think it all depends on the interview and what's discussed, you know? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:13, 18 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
True i have to same thinking. But Daytime Confidential is a source. They refer to it on SoapNet sometimes. Also Michael Fairman is definitely a reliable source. He goes behind the scenes and has video interviews. He is definitely good as a source. Soap Central i try not to use but i always have to with the pages im making - because they are the only refs available. I think whether or not SOap Central should be used as a source should be discussed because it has lots of good info from the past which is accessible. Anyway why would you feel Michael Fairman isn't a good source? :\ i think the SoapsSheKnows source could be used because its a SHARON CASE interview with the actual website. Im not sure tho. SoapJar 23:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
For me, SoapCentral is reliable because I know the owner and he's in connection with the soaps, especially their actors. It's an excellent archive as well, but the news they post is usually right. Some things they post are speculation, but that's to keep the fans up-to-date. So if SC cannot be used, then MFS should also not be used. And SOAPNet refers to Facebook as well, yet that is not a reliable, verifiable source. Verifiable is third-party, and MFS isn't always third-party when he reports. He places his own opinions, etc. Dan Kroll does not in the news postings. You know what I mean? Also, sorry for not replying earlier, had the wake/funeral the past few days. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well rt1 told me that it is a reliable source. I feel all of those (soapnet, soapcentral MFS) are all good sources. SOAPNet is a good source because it airs the soap operas and is an official character, with rights to all the soaps. Michael Fairman has video & audio interviews thats why i feel he is a good source. SoapJar 03:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
SOAPNet really can't be used since it's a network that airs the show, and network(s) aren't third-party sources. SOAPNet is tricky, but it lies under the same category with CBS/ABC/NBC. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello there edit

Hi! I'm new to Wikipedia. I'm a huge fan of The Bold and the Beautiful (B&B) and I have been editing some character pages. I'm very sensitive about my work and worry it isn't good enough. I have had a lot of generous help from SoapJar21 ("Arre") and I would just love to make friends/companions on Wiki. Thus far, I'm friends with SoapJar21 and Creativity97. They've been sooo nice to me and I see that you contribute a lot to soaps and I would love get advice from you as well as be your friend :) Two friends just doesn't seem enough! You can call me Soap General. Is there anything specific you would like me to call you, or is Musicfreak what you like to be called?? Anyhow, I would deeply appreciate to hear back from you. If you don't, that's okay. I just detest being lonely. BTW - what soaps do you watch? I watch B&B and DOOL. I don't watch the following soaps: Y&R: Boring, and General Hospital (GH): It's okay, but who has the time to watch? :) Arre said that they are working on character pages for Y&R. I haven't watched Y&R consecutively since 1993 so I know next to nothing, but when I watched Jill Foster was my favorite. Brenda Dickson was amazing until Jess Walton came on and ruined the role. That was a deal-breaker for me. Anyway, I've been loving Don Diamont on B&B. He's my all time favorite thus far. I hated him on Y&R though. Do you know what happened to his character? When I watched in 2010 he wasn't there. I realize I'm babbling on so please get back to me as I would love to be friends on Wiki :) Alfredo114 (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Both Creativity and SoapJar are dear friends, and have become such recently in the Wiki community. You can call me Musicfreak/MF/MF7676/7676. Anything related to my name, it's initials or anything I will respond to, aha. It's quite nice to meet you Alfredo, love your name! It reminds me of the Alfredo I love on my macaroni every now-and-again, aha. I watch all of the four current on-air soap operas. And any addition to pages that can help further improve the pages is well welcomed, and shouldn't shy you away from making such edits.
I disagree with you on Brenda vs. Jess as Jill. I adore Jess as Jill, she's done fantastic. Brenda was too camp in the role and would not fit in it today. She was a Diva, and I cannot see her side of her argument of her final years on Y&R. I miss Don on Y&R, I feel like Brad was a much stronger and well-versed character than Bill has ever been. I loved Bill up until this past year when he cheated on Katie and is continuing to lie to her. And babbling is fun, I tend to do it a lot if you really catch me on a subject, aha. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi again! Yeah like I said it's been 19 years since I followed Y&R so I don't know maybe Jess Walton has gotten better as Jill, all I know is that I hated her when she came on way back in 1987. And about Don Diamont, you never really answered my question to as what happened to his character on Y&R. It's been sooo long I don't even remember his character name, I don't really need his name but I really want to know what happened to his character.
Also, thanks for the compliments on my name! Fettuccine Alfredo is my favorite meal of all time so I named my username after it. Other than that I like being called Soap General. I was quite close to naming my account that but Fettuccine Alfredo surpasses soaps any day!
And I know that I'm encouraged to not shy away about editing, but people have already reverted my work and it makes me feel unwanted. In fact about five years ago in 2007 I had another Wiki account but I got involved in so many edit wars it overwhelmed me, I'm very sensitive and it wasn't easy to go through. I don't even remember the username or anything :P
But Don as Bill has become my favorite daytime character of all-time hands down. I realized that in early 2010. I don't care what he does, I love him sooo much. Other than that, my favorite characters on B&B include Stephanie Forrester (Bill took her place!), Amber Moore (who I understand was on Y&R for awhile), Pamela Douglas, Liam Spencer and Katie Logan. Katie hasn't really been impressing me lately but she's okay, however I've always disapproved of her marriage to Bill, that's one thing that Bill has done that really ticked me off. Other than that I could watch B&B every second of every day. I love it more than I love my home!! lol.
You watch Days? My favorite characters there are Sami Brady, Maggie Horton, Abe Carver, Bo Brady, Kate Roberts, John Black and Marlena Evans. Seems like a lot but I love them all the same. Days isn't always the best but I gotta watch it :) Anyway, I'm soooo greatful that you want to be my friend. Talk soon :) Alfredo114 (talk) 22:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Brad was killed off of Y&R following Colleen's death. He died saving Noah. And your name is making me hungry, aghahahahaha. It's always going to, now! Aha.
Well, unfortunately, you gotta toughen your skin up. I know how it is to be sensitive but in a place like Wiki, you gotta be strong and stand your ground. Don't let reverts upset you, sometimes you just got to be careful about the edits you're making!!
I love a couple of B&B characters, but it's hard because they're all hypocrites. As for Katie, love her. Heather Tom is a strong actress, and the role of Katie has been simmered since her heart transplant, but she's getting her spark back!! Bill has ticked me off enough with this almost sleeping with Steffy to having her as a daughter-in-law. Really Bill? Are you that desperate for her to be apart of your family? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Haha!! I just love him though :) Yes I know I have to toughen up I've been told that my whole life lol. Sensitivity just really hits me hard sometimes. Did you watch Guiding Light? As The World Turns? Both great and so sad when they were cancelled, watched them all the time. Actually, I haven't made any edits other than these talk pages :) I just think everything is sooooo well done!! Wiki is a place where I feel like I can open up and contribute, so I think that's personal growth for me. I was so devastated back in 2007 that I didn't even browse Wiki it was just to painful for me. I'm a bit of a baby in those ways. I just had no idea people can be so nice here. Everyone I dealt with prior to you guys were so inconsiderate and mean. I'm just soooo greatful that you are nice and friendly with me. Thank you. It is much appreciated <3 Alfredo114 (talk) 22:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I watched both GL and ATWT 'til their ending days, sad times for me. And on Wiki you gotta have tough skin, I'm going through a dispute right now as you can see below and I'm trying not to let it feel personal, which I somewhat feel it could be. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:03, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey there edit

Hi MF! Yes I'm doing fine, thank you for messaging me :) It's rare that someone has personal interest. Have you been helping Arre with the pages?? Do you know what year they're up to? I would still love to help. All the other ones look amazing, don't you agree? Looks like Alfredo (or Soap General as she instructed me to call her) has been making friends with everyone :) Anyway, thanks for chatting with me. I responded on your talk page as I figured you would check here first rather than on my page. Anyway, what do you think Victor's scheme is against Adam?? I haven't read any spoilers or anything so I have no idea? Any thoughts? Let me know, I love to chit chat about Y&R. Get back to me !! Creativity97 Talk? 22:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Randddommm adviceee :) edit

Hey. I would like some random advice. I know your busy but i hope you can reply. I decided to make a Soap Opera Online and set the bar to atleast 20 readers per episode. But i'm stuck on a name. Here are some titles, could you tell me if you think any are good? They all relate to themes for the series. Sorry there aren't many others other then you, Creativity that i can ask opinions from. Here they are:

  • Where Have You Been?
  • Turning Pages
  • Chasing Dreams
  • Power, Passion, Dreams (inspired by this old Australian Soap name)
  • Rags and Riches
  • Glory Days

Please let me know. I've been doing this for a week :D SoapJar 03:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I love Glory Days that sounds like an excellent title. Out of all of those, it seems to fit the most!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:27, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thankyou! I will credit you for helping me decide :) I was thinking that or Power, Passion Dreams so i could call it PPD :) i love abbreviations. SoapJar
Eh, PPD doesn't seem like a catchy enough title. Glory Days really catches you, as a reader. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KS Maxie.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:KS Maxie.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Colleen Carlton edit

Hi Musicfreak7676. I see that you keep deleting most of the actresses who have portrayed this character and linking to the casting section. The purpose of an infobox is to provide the reader with a quick rundown on important facts about the subject. The actresses who have played this character count as important details. The reader shouldn't have to wade through the casting section for that information when it could easily be placed in the infobox. I will be restoring the information again. Rocksey (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's too cluttered. If it's listed in the "Casting" just keep the last main actress. There's no reason to clutter up the info box with that information. Things are changing on these pages. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I see you kept it as contracted actresses, which looks better than that long list. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
What do you think is changing? Rocksey (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Just the way we're listening the actresses. But now that it's contract-only, it's fine. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Was this decided on by the project? Is there a discussion in it that I can look at? Rocksey (talk) 17:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Maxie pic edit

Do you really think I'm that stupid Musicfreak? That promo pic is not Kirsten because Kirsten hasn't had that long hair in over 10 years. She had it when she was in her teens than she cut it and hasn't had short hair since. So the pic is either a fake or a look a like. You need to face the facts. I watched GH in '09 in no way did she have long hair like that in '09 so it can't be her. I'm sorry but you are wrong on this one. Soapfan2013 (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

It IS Kirsten. She had it from Feb to April 2009. That's a promotional shoot she did AS Maxie for publication. YOU'RE the one wrong, I have more proof it's Kirsten if you wish to see that she DID have longer hair. She put extensions in to that, then cut it off during the end of 2009/2010 to that shorter, blonder 'do! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why would you use a pic with longer hair and use it as a Maxie pic if its really Kirsten, she is known for shorter hair, come on it looks alot like Jen Lilley. Soapfan2013 (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

IT DOESN'T MATTER ABOUT A LOOK SOAPFAN! I could use a pic from her in 2005 and it'd still be her. Jen Lilley looks like K. Storms hence the recast. It's Kirsten, I wouldn't put a pic up of Kirsten if it wasn't her. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

What was wrong with the pic before that one? Why did you have to change the pic? The previous pic was her, but than you changed it some pic with Kirsten as longer hair? Maxie never had long hair on the show. So why the change? I'd say change the pic back before that promo shot was on and leave it at that, but no you had to change the pic with a pic of Kirsten that doesn't even look like her character. I tried to improve the article with a pic that resembles Maxie more but no, you prefer one that doesn't even look like Maxie that people all know. That pic of Kirsten is a bad choice for an article pic. Soapfan2013 (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

SHE HAS HAD LONG HAIR! Prove to me she hasn't because I have proof she did Soapfan. I'm uploading another one to get you off my back. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit Warning edit

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --George Ho (talk) 22:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

I don't think you should be leaving over this. Come on MF, it will only be a 24 hours block if there is one. You did break the rule. However, you can prove that you were right in doing so. If you provide proof that you were correct then it makes the situation much easier. In future just remember, raise the issue at WP:SOAPS or Request page protection to solve the dispute.Rain the 1 22:44, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I know I did something wrong, but to be blocked over others who've done MUCH worse? I won't stand for that. I know I was in the right, I have the proof to prove it. And if I am blocked, whether it be 24 hours or more, I'm gone. No discussing on that. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
MF; please don't leave. I know that you felt like this before a few times. But you will regret it and come back. That user Soapfan2013 is blinded. That picture is fine and they think its a fake which is odd. Please don't leave.... You have much more to give. SoapJar 03:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Everything is fine now Arre. Don't worry. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have explained to Soapfan why the image they uploaded can't be used (inadequate source info). However the two do look alike. You said this one came from ABC ... can you provide a link to wherever you might have gotten it? It helps to have that in the source info. Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I got it from an image source, who got it from ABC Publishers. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have! edit

I have, but you don't realize B & B didn't air in CA yet! Wingard (talk) 22:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I ADDED DAYS AND B&B AND YOU REMOVED BOTH!!! THEY'RE US SOAPS! NOT CANADIAN! WE'VE TOLD YOU THIS!!!!! I CAN'T WAIT 'TIL YOUR PERMANENTLY BANNED!!!MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:02, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Edit warring is never a good idea. Instead of reverting Wingard you should have reported them for their bad behavior. I'm not going to be blocking anyone because you edit warred as well and I don't want to block you. The next time you see Wingard doing anything like this report them to WP:ANI though if I see anything I'll likely go ahead and block. AniMate 22:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
THAT'S NOT FAIR! THEY'RE SHOWING SIGNS OF WP:OWN THEY NEED TO BE BLOCKED!!!!!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but you edit warred as well. To be fair, you would have to be blocked as well. Additionally, you repeatedly edit warred on Wingard's talk page. When blocks are expired, editors are explicitly allowed to remove the notices about blocks that are no longer active. I assume you don't want to blocked, so I'm not blocking Wingard as both of you have behaved poorly here. Next time don't fight, don't edit war, just report violations and follow the rules. AniMate 22:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Then I'm done with this site if they're going to get away with this bull. They're in the wrong. They want to WP:OWN the page and because of it, this site is going to lose an actual contributor. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:17, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
There's nothing I can do if you want to leave. I would like to note WP:BLANKING in regards to Wingard's talk page. You very explicitly broke the rules there, and I'm letting you get away with that. Bad behavior from one user doesn't mean you get to behave badly too. And seriously, if Wingard pulls this tomorrow, I'll likely block them indefinitely. No need to leave over this, but if you stay you need to read up on WP:EDITWARRING and WP:Talk page guidelines. AniMate 22:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
They'll do it until they're left along, I can tell you that. And I don't want to stay if that annoyance of editing from that member is going to be allowed to stay. I won't do it. I'd rather leave and keep my sanity and stress level down than deal with them. All my work now is worthless because of them. They can live with that and let Wiki go down. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well someone else blocked Wingard indefinitely. So, consider this your final warning. I'll block you for 24 hours the next time you edit war. You also need to read WP:No personal attacks. Don't call someone an asswipe. Behave like a mature adult while you're here. AniMate 22:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • (e/c) FYI, I've blocked Wingard for edit warring, but the only reason I haven't blocked you too is (1) that you didn't revert after AniMate's warning above, and (2) you're not coming off a 1 week block for edit warring, and he is. But yes, you were edit warring too, and no, that isn't the optimal way to solve a problem. When you fnd yourself typing in all caps, that's an indication that you probably ought to take a break. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
i'm sorry, but as someone who's been trying to better certain pages apart of this community only to have someone come into this place and try to make it seem like they're in the complete right, I don't take kindly to such things. As of right now, I am really not wanting to stick around. And of course I wouldn't remove Ani's things. Unlike them, I accept my actions. They're the one who continually runs from their actions. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
The correct response to the behavior you're describing is to calmly report them and not to edit war. WP:CIVIL is something you should also read. When you're dealing with someone like Wingard, you should try your best to dispassionately follow WP:Dispute resolution or report them at an appropriate noticeboard. AniMate 22:45, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Wingard too, should have learned their message. They are the one that initiated it. But true, you guys shouldn't have edit warred for the second time. SoapJar 03:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

HELP!! edit

  • Note: Thread moved here at George's request from his talkpage.
  • Apologies for the clutter. Please feel free to delete as read.
  • George didn't want my long comments on his page setting off his orange bar/email.
  • Begoontalk 05:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

A certain user is battling in edit warring concerning soap pages because they show signs of WP:OWN and have been blocked TWICE for said things. And they continually do such because they believe we should let them do it since they're from a certain country and it's all they can do. Their excuses are WRONG. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

MusicFreak7676, I just glanced at your recent contributions, and it seems you are very upset about a user, and are currently treating Wikipedia as a bit of a WP:BATTLEFIELD.
I see you have already had advice from User:AniMate and User:Floquenbeam, who are both respected administrators, on your talk page. It's good advice. You should listen to it and follow it. I understand it can be frustrating, but the processes do exist and you need to let them work.
I'd also recommend looking at WP:CANVASS, because, although you haven't specifically mentioned the WP:ANI thread on this, it could look as though you are posting on user pages to try to get support for your position, which is frowned on.
George is not an administrator: he's a good, very knowledgeable and experienced editor who makes very many good contributions, but he cannot help you with disputes like this, so bringing concerns like this to his talk page is not productive. As one of George's "mentors", I noticed this message on his page. I would have 2 additional pieces of advice for you:
  • Stop the WP:BATTLEFIELD mentality. It rarely results in your desired outcome.
  • Do not try to involve other people, such as George, in your battles.
If you have concerns about another user's behaviour, and you cannot solve your concerns by discussion with the editor in question, then follow WP:DR. You can bring it up with an administrator you trust, or at WP:RFC/U or WP:ANI, as you did, but remember that those solutions will involve looking at both sides of any issue, so your own behaviour is under scrutiny, too. Begoontalk 22:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
May you please export this whole section to Music's talk page? I'm getting change notices. --George Ho (talk) 04:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Moved - Begoontalk 05:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

heyyyyyyy :p edit

Hey MF. I truly hope you're not gone for good because of Wingard. Anyway, i want more of your input on the Diane murder-Nikki think.....don't you think that MAB should have made it that Patty killed Diane - because i just realized Patty has had it in for Diane forever; since she (Diane) slept with Jack behind Patty's back. Anyway what do u think of Avery? :pp i think they are ruining her character. Also this user is annoyed at me for posting something on Wingard's page omg -_- they think that I am obsessing over the episode count and should leave wikipedia and "find" a new website like Wth? SoapJar 10:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Also omg i find it sweet what Deacon did!!! He really protected Nikki :) and the fact that he hit a dead women on the head like 8 times is really creepy who could do that?! lmao. SoapJar 11:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have no desire to stay now SoapJar. Wingard has gotten their block lifted to one week from infinite, which I don't agree with as I know they'll go back to their ways. I'm not with the injustice. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Musicfreak - If this user keeps up their editing as before - they'll have the previous block returned. This is normal procedure and it is designed to give people more than one chance. You shouldn't have any problems now tbh - because they have to abide by the rules. These things happen everyday on here, you learn to get used to it. You won't achieve anything leaving. Nothing what so ever. Besides, how boring if giving up because of other peoples actions. You are much better than that.Rain the 1 17:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I may be much better than that RTO but I don't believe they've changed. They said it TWICE and continually do it over and over again. I've told them it doesn't need to air on California nor be uploaded to CBS.com to be updated. And they choose to ignore it. And on DAYS they undo my edit and then go and edit it in as their own. They are WP:OWN articles. I'm not going to sit by and watch him continually come back to this place and cause a disturbance. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well you shouldn't have any further problems with them because they will either follow the rules and not disrupt articles - or they will disrupt and not be given another chance. So you really should not find any more issues in the long run. How are you anyway? Been up to anything good over the last few days?Rain the 1 20:19, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've been iffy actually. I lost a family member last week and some other personal problems are arising currently. But I'm trying to keep myself together and focus on my websites and forum right now. They need some major TLC. How about yourself? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey MF please don't leave Wiki I totally get your family problems but Wingard will get blocked again. Please don't leave. I will miss you :( Creativity97 Talk? 21:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Right now, I'm on the fence and very open in looking at everyone who's editing. But I won't tolerate someone telling lies and trying to avoid to their problems. Right now, if something does happen again, I will be gone and won't return. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:07, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry this has to happen, but if you do end up leaving, thanks for all your help with everything. I will miss you on Wiki MF. Catch ya later :P Creativity97 Talk? 22:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Only if it absolutely happens again, which I suspect it will. I refuse to let this happen thrice. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:44, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Noooo!! Please don't leave Wiki! You were becoming a dear friend of mine and I don't want you to go. I will miss you dreadfully. Please don't leave. I can't deal with this, I've lost so many friends in my life I don't know how I'm supposed to handle this. I'll still have Arre and Creativity but it won't be the same without you MF! Please don't leave us :( I want to say something to Wingard but I've seen what happened to Creativity; they got messages saying to stop sending "personal attacks." I disagree with that. I'm just sorry someone like Wingard had to send you off Wiki. They're a nobody and they have no right to push you over the edge and make you leave. If anyone should leave it should be Wingard. Please don't go. Can't we just have Wingard reported? You don't have to leave. They will be blocked for maybe longer this time. It doesn't have to come to this. I won't let you go. Please don't leave. Get back to me!!! Alfredo114 (talk) 22:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Aw Alfredo you're so cute. Thank you so much for your kind words! But please, do not go and attack Wingard. If it happens again, I will go. And I feel like it will happen again. But here's to a glimmer of hope that it doesn't. Gotta have a glass half-full than half-empty. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry to hear that MF. Well I've just been about, not done anything of excitement really. :/ What forum do you run? Sorry If I am being nosey, you just seem interesting.Rain the 1 22:48, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Aw, thank you. Aha. It's not an exciting part of the year, it's the end of January (already), aha. And I run an online alternate music RPG. And my websites are for my websoaps that I write. Nope, not being nosey, aha. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:59, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I find it so unfair that people like you (MF), Creativity and others (and myself yesterday) are getting warnings about telling Wingard off (even though i will try to hold off on it). They are provoking us OBVIOUSLYYYY which is just stupid. SoapJar 02:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Eh, at least my block was quickly revoked and mis-added. Hopefully it doesn't happen again. I don't like knowing there was a block against me. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome MF. ;) ..and atleast it block mistake is solved now then. All those websites, well that means you have a lot of work to do online doesn't it. I don't know how you keep up superman. The soap articles have been a right headache over the last few weeks lol. When will it all settle down once again. I think things have gone wild on the US side because you three have come along clued up on the rules and are improving them.Rain the 1 02:24, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Aha, thanks. Yes I definitely do have a lot on my plate. How I do it all is beyond my comprehension. Aha. I'm remodeling my sites as we speak, aha. And yeah, SoapJar/Creativity/Myself have definitely thrown everything up into the air. But a lot is changing in US Soaps; cancellations, changes, etc. Everything is changing over here. US Soaps were the original and without us, UK/Australia wouldn't have soaps, IMHO. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sincere apologies edit

I accidentally blocked you, but removed it quickly. The block was intended for your friend, not you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK. I was about to say I had no clue what was going on, because I had no clue why I was blocked. It still says I'm blocked though and cannot edit pages! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Like is the block on me going to stay or can it be removed from myself and my record, especially if it's misplaced? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:48, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
The autoblock is now removed, and you should be able to edit. As the block log clearly shows it was a mistake, it will not affect you. Let me know here if you can't edit (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
OK. I just didn't want that block to be used against me. I feel like someone's going to see the "Block Log" and automatically see me as a bad person, which I'm not. I get it was a misunderstanding, I'm just anal about that stuff, ya know? LOL. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Heh ... you'll never do anything that requires blocking, so no issues. The blog log clearly states "wrong user - my apologies" - no admin could ever use that against you should a future block be required (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Just to let you know a couple of things, however: in response to this, you should know that a user has a right to remove a warning - as far as admins are concerned, that's proof that it's been read. Sure, it does not mean they accept it, but it still has the same effect. Second, it's quite possible you should have received a block. An edit-summary that reads "JUST STOP! YOU'RE NOT HELPING THIS SITE!!!! LEAVE!!!!" is not, and never will be appropriate. Do not have discussions via edit-summaries, and do not ever try to force someone to leave the project. Edit-summaries describe the edit. Yelling (all capital letters) gets you nowhere. We have dispute resolution processes ... rather that get angry about what happens on a website, keep cool and take the high road (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sorry but when I'm in the moment and a user is in the wrong, I won't back down. Hence why I would've rather have left because I know that user is going to go right back to their old ways. I know it. And if I don't stop them, I don't feel like anyone else will and they'll continually fall for their lies. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:10, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I both acknowledge and understand what you're saying, but there's a right way and a wrong way .. don't martyr yourself by doing things the wrong way. We have ANI, AIV, AN3 for a reason ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I get that now, I do. But when I'm in the moment, I don't switch off. Especially concerning said member. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Right MF - I already had that article in my watchlist - so I was aware what potentially could happen - and it did. I'm not an admin so there is little I can do about Soapfan2013's conduct. I don't think linking articles affected by a content helps either - I think many see that kind of thing as asking someone else to join in. I think the problem is that you are making yourself the martyr. You, Creativity and Soapjar started something good. Now for some reason on here - editing articles within the guidelines, following protocol can often leave you feeling like you have drawn the short end of the stick. I say this because there are so many IP editors and new editors with an interest in these soap opera articles - but they are unfamiliar with adding sources, the real world perspective for fiction, the MoS on fiction then every other thing that comes with it.
You have to decide whether a user is in their eyes, trying to help or just disrupt. The ones who are disruptive, who you have actually had to deal with, can be reported. The others are worth trying to talk with - we were all new once and probably not that clued up on the day to day running of this place. So a help in hand sometimes works. So buddio, please try and not argue over edit summaries or let something esculate into an edit war. There are so many things I disagree with - Everyone would like to speak their mind, but you just have to think about it and move on.
However, this other editor who the dispute is with - they are lucky because they just got a friendly warning for their outlandish edit summary. So I can understand why you feel hard done to. I mean they told me to keep out of "their" discussions - all because I pointed out that they do not own the copyrights to a TV series because they brought the series boxset. So yeah, when you offer help it is not always wanted... I hope you take the advice though. :)Rain the 1 03:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

General Hospital edit

Please note that you have updated the episode count for January 26, 2012 before the show has aired its episode.

In the future, please wait for the episode to air before updating the episode count. You don't necessarily have to wait for the episode to be over at 4:00pm. You can update it as early as when General Hospital starts at 3:00pm (Eastern time). But it should not be updated when The Revolution is still on the air.

Thank you for understanding and happy editing. Farine (talk) 19:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I usually just go in one fell swoop. Didn't mean to cause any dysfunction or anything. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry about. It's not biggie. We all do mistakes here on Wikipedia. But we learn from them which allows us to not repeat them.
Best regards Farine (talk) 20:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Exactly. Once again, apologies. Won't happen again. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Hi MF, I was blocked trying to defend you. I obviously made some bad choices and regret them awfully, but I'm glad that I at least had the power to try to help you out. No I'm not mad at you, I was only off Wiki for 31 hrs. I still hope you won't be leaving. I knew deep down I shouldn't have posted that message on Wingard's talk page. I just hope now everything will be the same; that no one will look into my files and ignore me or be snide to me because I was blocked trying to defend one of my companions. It's not that I'm mad, I'm just distraught. I was extremely angry when I got the message of my ban; not at you just in general. Anyway, it's all over now and I just hope that I can put in the past and everyone else can too :) Thanks for your support. It goes a long way. PS - Let me know on if you will be leaving soon or not. :) Creativity97 Talk? 22:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

OMG Creativity you were blocked?? That's insane! I had no idea I was crazy busy the last few days and haven't been on Wiki since Tuesday. That's unfortunate, but yes it's good that it's in the past now I guess :P And MF, I saw that B&B promo you were talking about, OMG I'm soooo happy Bill and Katie are over. Bill can do better. Katie not so sure, have to see. Anyway, Creativity everything will be okay and MF you aren't leaving anymore are you?? Keep me posted. Alfredo114 (talk) 22:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
CREATIVITY: I just didn't want you to be angry at me if you were. I get you were trying to defend me and be on my side. I do appreciate it, but two wrongs don't make a right. We all get angry over things, I get that. All that matters is that you're back and I'm quite happy about that! Missed ya!
ALFREDO: Yes, Creativity was blocked for 31 hours. And no, Katie can do better. Bill belongs in the slums department. What he's done is despicable in my opinion. And no, I'm not leaving. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
YAY!! You're not leaving? That's a relief. Again thank you for your support; it means a lot and goes a long way, I hope you don't mind but as of now can we not talk about my block anymore? I know my message was about it and you had to respond, but I want to feel like it never happened and that means just acting like it never happened (we both know it did, I just want to move on). Thanks, talk soon !! Creativity97 Talk? 23:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
And also, I was on the Adam Newman page and you know how the picture of of Chris Engen as Adam was below in the article? Well I moved it to where an alternate picture of a portrayer would go, like right before the relationships drop-down column. I think it looks better, what do you think?? Let me know :) Creativity97 Talk? 23:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
That's fine. That's actually where the image should have been originally. I don't know why it wasn't there in the first place. Looks good, thanks Creativity! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
:( sorry about the Creativity it was unfortunate but i wouldn't mind being blocked if i got a point across defending a friend. Im happy Katie and Bill are over. For me they didn't have a lot of connection onscreen on chemistry. I HATE Katie and Heather Tom needs to be "VICTORIA!" i was devestated when she switched to B&B, im so used to calling her Victoria i've never adjusted to this Katie crap. I love the $$ Bill!! He is like B&B's Victor! (A Younger version) and i like him as $$Bill better then Brad. Hope he ends up with Steffy now THEY have chemistry. Liam and Hope can go play somewhere else with their childish love affair, they annoy the crap out of me as a couple and i can FALL ASLEEP watching them. Even Liam's actor said he would rather the character with Steffy - aha. LOL i saw what you said on twitter MF, that in soap world Victor and Sharon were married 2 days - is that true? Well on air they were married 16 days, and Soap Time is extended e.g. the 2.5 years Taylor was away and thought dead, was 7 years on B&B and Nikki & Victor's marriage was extended to like a decade! THe only thing they haven't extended is Nick & Sharon's marriage, they dwelt on the fact that they kept a couple together for 10 years. And they extended (vomit) Nick and Phylils' marriage to like longer so she could actually have a chance at measuring up to Nick and Sharon as a couple...sorry for this S.A lol!!! SoapJar 03:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I love Heather Tom as Katie. When they give her good material, she's excellent. I wouldn't want her back as Victoria as Amelia has earned her right in the role. "Kill/Batie" never fit, and Bill/Steffy belong for how disgusting they've been concerning Liam/Hope, etc. Steffy never respected Liam/Hope's engagement, and neither did Ridge. Yet Steffy enters into the relationship and automatically it has to be respected? NO NO NO. And Bill locking Katie up? How desperate do you have to be? And yes, Sharon/Victor have only been married two days to a week, not two or more weeks. Soap time is slow, and then fast and then slow. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:46, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thats funny. The character of Katie always gets on my nerves ever since she was with Bill. They never matched, true. Heather Tom will ALWAYS be my "Victoria". Thats how I saw are again, and i was pretty annoyed that they changed the actress instead of just leaving the character out, but she has (Amelia) earned her place. Victoria is the daughter of Victor, and i think you were the one who said this before, but Heather Tom can hold are own and is a very strong actress in the part of Victoria who always argues with Victor, but Amelia comes off as weak to me. AHAHA IKR!?!! How weird was that? He is cray-cray desperate! Its hilarious! Katie needs to leave his butt. True Steffy didn't respect Hope/Liam (even though they are the most awful couple, make me sleep they are so boring together and don't have much chemistry for me), she is just like Brooke was with all of Ridge's other relationships, Ashley, Taylor, Caroline. She will turn into Brooke lol her worst nightmare. And at first (in like 2010 ) i was wondering who Hope would give her virginity up to for the first time, but they have DRAGGED it out too long and this show is the When Will Hope? show lol. TBA, i haven't watched B&B alot. I FF the scenes. I love seeing people like Amber, Dayzee, Marcus, Taylor, Stephanie. For the last YEAR they've focused a book on the Spencers, annoys the crap out of me ahahhaha. SoapJar 00:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I get where Hope is coming from though, because as a male, I as well am a virgin. So I understand that concept and respect it. Amelia can be weaker than Heather, but I feel like Amelia fits more into the Newman mold than Heather has. Know who else I'd love to see as Victoria? Tamara Braun!! I know, controversial, but Amelia isn't leaving. She's under new contract and they wouldn't ditch her for Heather. Nor do I think Heather would go back. And did you watch today? WTF was on Taylor's head? A rat? LOL. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
You said you didn't mind so, Can I just ask how old you are then?Rain the 1 01:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm 19. Why RTO? How old are you? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I am 21. What is RTO?Rain the 1 03:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
RTO = Rain The One. Aha. Why did you ask in the first place, anyway? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh yeah. Lol Well I asked because you said you had your V still. Well not many lesbians I know have actually done that. How do you manage it?Rain the 1 03:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
LOL. I'm not a lesbian, I'm a male. Ahaha. That was hysterical, I'm sorry to laugh but I had to, aha. And I've just never had a boyfriend, aha. I ain't losing it to some slut. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 04:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh I am sorry for that. :/ Well that is something else we have in common then, both gay guys with OCD and a liking for soap operas.. It's a hard life isn't it. lolRain the 1 04:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh please RT1, do not worry about it. Aha. I get called a woman most times because I have longer hair than most men. I'm quite used to it. YAY for being gay men! Boo for OCD! YAY for soap operas!! Aha, We're a match made is heaven aren't we? ;) MusicFreak7676 TALK! 04:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

That we are. Well, aside from the fact we cannot agree on soapbox colours and that I through my V out the window when I was 15 - once you pop, you just don't stop.. as they say :PRain the 1 04:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
LOL. I've never even been on a date. Aha. It's quite sad. But alas, I live on. Aha. WOW. V-Card out the door at 15? You lucky beyotch. Aha. And we gotta agree on a colour for a soapbox, aha. We gotta gurrll. 17:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Diane Jenkins Image edit

Hey MF someone messed up the Maura West Diane Jenkins picture on her page and I'm don't know how to fix it, its really simple but I don't know what to do. I was the last to edit the page but I didn't mess up the picture, I was merely trying to fix it. Could you take a look and fix it? Hope I'm not asking too much. Thanks! Creativity97 Talk? 01:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Fixed it, no more problems. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks so much!! I felt stupid asking you to help because I'm usually good at fixing that sort of stuff but anyhow thanks again!! Creativity97 Talk? 03:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
No worries. The warning for deletion just needed to be removed. I've been trying to find UHQ promotional images from Maura's time on Y&R but they don't exist, which does not surprise me. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:44, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:KA Hope.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:KA Hope.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

General Hospital edit

Please do not update the episode count until General Hospital has aired its episode. Nothing guarantees at 100% that General Hospital will air today. If you absolutely want to do all four soap operas in one loop, then wait until General Hospital has aired (not Y&R, B&B or DAYS). Thank you. Farine (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Shoot, sorry Farine. I thought I had done Y&R not GH. My mistake, should've paid more attention. And it is airing today, LOL. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:06, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Diana DeGarmo edit

Hey Musicfreak,

Hope your doing ok. I just wanted your input on something. I know how you said that soap opera digest overrides the network credits but DeGarmo has been on Y&R since October and I have looked every single week and her name is added to the Contract Cast List. Is their a copy of the issue you saw this information in becuase I still think she is a Contract Player and that might have just been a misprint. Let me know. Thanks TVFAN24 (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's not a misprint TVFan. She's recurring. I still have the issue, and will have to look for it. I have stacks of SOD magazines dating back to 2010. So I have to look. But SOD trumps the show, since the show isn't third-party. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok thanks. If you find it I would like to take a peek. Thanks. TVFAN24 (talk) 19:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

How would you be able to "take a peek"? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:07, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you can scan the particular article or something. TVFAN24 (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't have a scanner. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Did it say how long she plans on staying on the soap?? TVFAN24 (talk) 19:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

No. It said she didn't know how long she would be staying. It wasn't a sure-fire thing for how long she'd be staying. She said it'd be for as long as the storyline permitted her to stay. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:14, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Maybe I should write to CBS Daytime and tell them that her name has been appearing in the contract list on the ending credits when she should be in the recurring list. TVFAN24 (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

CBS Daytime, I'm sure, could care less where she's listed. CBS doesn't comment on contracts or recurring statuses. They've always said that. But judging by her interview, she's under a recurring status. Just like Tracey Bergman. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:17, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah but at least they list Bregman under recurring?? TVFAN24 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Because she's been there longer. But I don't think you're understanding TVFan, the show's credits at the end of the show cannot be used as a source for saying she's contract vs. recurring. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Here's another article I found from TV Guide http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/the-young-and-the-restless/news/194483/2 TVFAN24 (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

See, having that constitutes her under a contracted role. That's all you needed from the start TVFan. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:22, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yea, may I change it then?? TVFAN24 (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I already did. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your too quick. See I knew I was right. TVFAN24 (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's not about knowing you're right TVFan. It's about proving your point. This isn't a place for I'm Right, You're Wrong. This is a place for fact-based information. And from the information I did, my side was right. And that article, proved such wrong. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok well anyway that issue is settled and closed. TVFAN24 (talk) 19:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I never viewed it as an issue, LOL. Nor should you have. But now we can both go our merry ways and have it dealt with and over with. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

General Hospital edit

Soap2013 has put Frank Valentini on the infobox. Since I know that you're a fan of General Hospital, can you tell me if the first FV/RC episode has aired yet or not? Thanks Farine (talk) 01:51, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I put Valentini in the infobox. He began airing yesterday, unfortunately. Carlivati, thankfully, does not begin until the end of the month. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
That's strange. Why would Valentini start at a different time than RC? Anyway, I'll update the ABC Daytime article. Thanks. Farine (talk) 02:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I believe Ron wasn't available. Or, in my opinion, hopefully, they aren't letting him air. Aha. I think it had something to do with OLTL. But Valentini has been unfortunately listed for the past two days. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:19, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Does this mean that Garin Wolf is still listed? Or they just don't credit the writer? Farine (talk) 02:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Every piece of info in the infobox is correct. Trust me. :) MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

HI :) edit

Hi. I've been talking a break on Soaps to focus on the JLo page but i missed chatting to you...what are you thinking of Y&R right now? I feel bad for Genevieve ...she isn't THAT bad. Everyone frigging gangs up on er' (including Cane, he was overreacting HELA big time) and i think Jack is miserable... he shouldn't forget how many bad things he has done, he acts like Genevieve has committed adultery lmao. I know you hate Shadam, but i think it shows what a humanitarian and caring warm-hearted person is Sharon for her to stay with Adam :') truly a great women. I heard she is taking Adam to Kansas while he is blind..that's so sweet..hopefully THAT can CHANGE Him. That's what i love about people like Sharon...they never give up on people. I know this is the weirdest thing ever...but i LOVE Patty. She is so damn cute like a 5 year old. And i love watching her with Paul and Todd, so cute lol. I hate how Ashley was to her in the hospital, what a FLAKE. And HELALALALALALAA DOOL!!!!!!! DOOL is SO GOOD lol...but wtf? CARRIE & RAFE? AHAH thats funny to me. I could care less about Sami's love life, i only want her with E.J. and i watched the writers screw that up, so i want her to divorce Rafe. As for B&B, are you watching? Its just the TYPICAL thing...the HOgan gets what she wants (HOpe) and the "Taylor" (Steffy) gets nothing. Its sooo boring. Liam and Hope are a boring couple. Bill needs to leave Katie and their marriage needs to end; he needs to get with Steffy and end her "dream" about Liam EVENTUALLY coming back to her LOL. LOL i read a ONCE in a life-time spoiler, "Ridge takes Taylor's side instead of Brooke's" lmfao. ALso Hope is such an annoying school girl she is a brat all she cares about is business :\. Any i want your views! :) x..also how are things with you on a personal level? :( still struggling? Hope you're okay :))) SoapJar 17:13, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I missed chatting with you too!! I love Gen, but if I could have Diane back I would. And Jack is pissed because it's a secret kept, knowing how much he wanted BoN. I can understand where he's coming from, I do. As for Sharon, I'd find it even more sweet if Adam wasn't a lying asshole. He took Faith and tried marrying Sharon only to leave her at the altar in a jail cell. That's a horrific person. He destroyed evidence against her. I don't believe he loves her as much as he says he does. And yeah, she is taking him to Kansas. And Patty is awesome when she's in kiddy mode. "Do you think she likes cats?" Aha, she's out of it like mad.
B&B is boring. I'm over this bullshit concerning the new Ridge/Brooke/Taylor thing. I'm happy Liam is with Hope, I couldn't stand how hypocritical Steffy has been, just like her mother. Katie needs to leave Bill, but I worry that if they split up Katie has no storyline and I love Katie. She's strong. I want her to take over Forrester or Spencer Publications. Steffy is a brat and a hoebag. Sorry, but it's the truth.
Personal life is still struggling. But I'm getting through with it as much as I possibly can! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hey MF!! Missed you :) Speaking of personal struggles, that was my reason for being AWOL for the past week. My aunt and grandmother were killed in a car accident; it was very sad but I stayed strong :) Please don't express a great deal of sadness. In my family we grieve and let go, we're still grieving but we go on with our lives, you know? (I mentioned taking a break to C97). B&B isn't boring!! How could you say something like that. It's amazing right now! I'm loving Steffy! I love bitchy "hoebag" characters haha lol. Katie pisses me off when I watch her. UGH! I hate Heather Tom now. I used to love her but ever since like last August Katie has been spiraling downhill. And hey guess what I found a box of old Soap Opera Digest magazines from the 90s today. They're so old! Reading them makes me miss GL and ATWT even more :( Anyhow I hope you pull through your personal struggles. Mine will subside. I'm weird that way. I'm very sensitive about just about everything except death. Bizarre. Anyway get back to me soon!! Alfredo114 (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Im over Diane leaving; and i've accepted the stupidity of Y&R writers. Yes i love gen too! AMAZING ACTRESS!!!! :D I love this character better then her GH one. True; but its soap world. I never hold things against people; unless THEY someway do something BAD to one of my favorites, then i hate their character. I HATED ADAM but i have to admit Shadam are a twisted shade of SWEET<3. I heard this KAnsas thing is going to "open up his mind" and change him ~ AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA, ADAM WON'T CHANGE! OMG YES PATTY is such a kid<3 "Paul's too young to have a child. He is only 14" lmfao. LOL I KNOW! I WAS ROTFL "Do you think she likes cats?". Damn i don't care what patty does, i love her lol. B&B is too boring. YES SOAP GENERAL! I LOVE STEFFY THE BITCH! AMAZING CHARACTER. She has depth unlike Hope. Why don't we renamed the show: The Hope and the Virginity LOL. Hope is such an annoying person. Katie IS SOOO ANNOYING. Heather Tom is amazing as VIctoria, and i will stand by that. Katie is an irritating character for me :\ i love DONNA!. HOpe has only been on the show for 1.5 years as an adult, and has already hypothetically been a romantic interest for 4 LOL. I don't see how Steffy was a "hypocrit" but she was insecure as hella, like PhyHO from Y&R. Katie doesn't deserve 1% of Forrester, but she does SPencer. I found it ETERNALLY annoying how the logans think they are equally rightful contributers to Forrester (even though brooke is sort of, through her skankyness with the bedroom thing which was a success). Forrester is class and the Logans unfortunately have none. The only CLASSY people on this show is.....probably DAYZEE LO lMFAO everyone on this show is disgrace. Steffy needs a man not Liam he is a puppy, she needs the big dog Bill. And its true; the only reason Bill stayed with annoying Katie is because of her overreacting heart thing ..please 0_0 lol but Heather WORKED those scenes. Hope both of you work out your personal lives and everything gets better. Also im so happy they are resting Taylor on B&B...she deserves to grow into her 50s gracefully without MAJOR storylines. Hunter isn't THAT good of an actress but i love her. SoapJar 23:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, but B&B has always been boring to me. Same recycled storylines over the past 30+ years. And I liked Steffy until she ditched Marcus and turned into her mother, desperate and entitled. And I love Heather Tom as an actress, she's very talented. And Steffy was hypocritical because she never respected Liam and Hope's engagement, yet she marries him and all of a sudden it's "respect my marriage." So yes, she is a hypocrite. I wish Liam had let her drown and it brought Phoebe back. I wouldn't want Heather back as Victoria as I love Amelia Heinle in the role and she's earned it. And Taylor as a character is just stupid, I've never liked her. She's too needy. She had Jack, found out he was biologically Brooke's than totally gave up on him. And the only class person on the show are RJ and Brooke/Nick's son. Everyone else can't keep their legs shut or pants zipped. Also, Alfredo can you reply on your page? It's hard replying to two people in one discussion place. I'm not that organized. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:23, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Info on updating edit

Noticed that you updated either Days or B&B last week one minute before airtime. Not trying to fight again, just saying. Will keep that in mind to be precise. Thank you for telling me. Wingard (talk) 18:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK I will. It was an accident. I clicked the save button 10 seconds before and thought it'd take some time before it'd be saved, but it was saved instantly. Another lesson learned for me. Wingard (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

You both need to calm down over this. It's an absolutely trivial detail about the show, and we don't need you two in a race to see who gets to update it first. I understand there is some bad blood between you, but don't get bent out of shape over such a minor detail. AniMate 20:30, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm just following what I've been told AniMate, not to update prior to the episode beginning to air. Not trying to cause any bad blood again. I'm really not. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Me neither. Wingard (talk) 20:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

... and just we don't update sports scores as they occur, we don't need to rush to update episode counts. Besides, the episode is not considered to have aired until after it's complete - if the network shows 5 minutes then pulls the plug due to some global emergency, the episode count cannot/should not increment. It's not aired until the whole thing is aired, so episode counts should not change until a minute after the show is done (if ever) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
OK. That I can agree to, that I have no issues with. That makes more logical sense. But Wingard undid my edit, which was beyond an episode count. I changed a setting to the "Start Date" code. I think that needs to be investigated, as it undoes his agreement to not revert ANY edits. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Can you help? edit

Hi MF! I spent a lot of time creating a page for Garrett Ryan. Now it says there's a cite error and no reflist, but I put one and fixed it billions of times!! It's very frustrating and because of this apparent cite error the filmography table I made (which took FOREVER) won't show. If I'm not asking too much could you take a look and maybe determine the problem? It's really irritating me and I took time and effort to find some really good sources. So could you do that and let me know? I really don't want the page to be up for speedy deletion. Thanks a million :) Creativity97 Talk? 16:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I tried fixing it, and honestly, I don't know why it's working. I'd remove everything and re-write it or Copy/Paste everything back in and make sure all the "Ref" coding is okay. I don't understand why it isn't working, it has to be a glitch/error. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thanks for trying :) I detest when things like that happen. I just want the filmography table I worked so hard on to appear. I try to tweak some more things but I'm really stumped here. I'll ask around some more maybe SoapJar or Raintheone, or maybe some editor will see it and fix it in two minutes. Anyway thanks for trying I'll keep you posted. Creativity97 Talk? 18:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Okay, BWilkins just fixed everything. Thanks again for your help. Creativity97 Talk? 18:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I don't know what was happening, but I noticed you hadn't closed off the "Filmography" box, so maybe that was it? I don't know, glad it's fixed! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi again! I saw you fixed the Garrett Ryan Filmography table by moving the years to the first column. Thank you so much, it looks better that way :) I was just wondering if maybe you could do me a huge favor by doing the exact same thing you did there on the Jessica Heap and Robbie Tucker pages? I'm busy working on some other Y&R soap stuff at the moment and was wondering if you could help me out :) I'm still working on some sources for all three pages as I want them to be well sourced and semi-perfect, you know? If you don't have any time right now to fix those other Filmography tables right now that's fine, I'll figure something out. Let me know!! PS - it was that I hadn't closed off Garrett Ryan's filmography table properly and was causing the problem. Thanks for all your help! Creativity97 Talk? 04:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I planned on doing it for those pages as well, but I was so exhausted last night because I had the busiest day yesterday. I can do the other pages, as well. I just know putting the year in the second column looked really wrong and off. So I had to fix it, OCD/Anal in me. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!! Hahaha I'm anal retentive too :) My friends call me Rain Man, but I'm not autistic lol. I'm always coming across pages that "just look wrong" and have to fix them. That's how I started on Wiki, some pages looked awful and I fixed them up :) Anyway, thanks for all your help. But overall, do Garrett Ryan and Robbie Tucker generally look okay? I worked really hard on them and I'm struggling to find additional sources for verification. I found this one from star-kidz.net but someone removed it saying it wasn't reliable. Anyway, let me know !! Creativity97 Talk? 19:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think they look fine. As long as IMBD is a general source, you should be fine. And adding along the way should be OK! I will definitely work on them in a little while! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! Sorry to barge in on this haha but MF I saw on the Y&R page that you will now be updating the episode count at the end of the week? What kind of dispute caused that? Just curious :) And I was wondering ... how do you create a sandbox?? There's a lot of pages that I want to create but I don't know how to make a sandbox so I can work on them first before publishing. Could you let me know? I've tried looking around for help but nothing seems to be able to help, and since you're my friend I thought you could help me out, like you did with my signature :) Anyway let me know. Creativity97 Talk? 18:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wingard did. Also Creativity, like I told Alfredo, can you make your own talk segment when talking to me and not interrupt someone else's? It's just easier to keep conversations with different people in different places. Also, it pertained to Alfredo and people believing they shouldn't be updated every single day. So now it's just easier to do it at the end of the week. As for Sandbox things, it's coded as: User:USERNAMEHERE/PAGE_NAME|Page Display Name, all wrapped into the code bars. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sheryl Underwood edit

Hey Musicfreak,

The reason why I removed Sheryl Underwood is b/c I happened to look yesterday and you removed Ian Buchanan from the Days site yet the episode had not aired in all areas yet. I was going to say the same thing to you. Is it ok for you to do yet no one else can??? Please help me understand. TVFAN24 (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I did it and then was corrected TVFan. And upon correction, if you do note, I did re-add once episode had shown in all areas. While I don't agree with such a rule, I follow it. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

ahahah edit

AHA well there we go! DOOL stole my McCallister soap thingy lol :) that's funny aha. Arrekea 13:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

They did, aha. But oh well, I'm currently creating a page for him in my Sandbox. :D MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there edit

Hi MF. I'm sorry for barging in on your conversation with Arre a while back. I didn't respond on my page because I was busy that day. Sorry :( I just wanted to comment you on something in your userbox. You put the "not a fan" one and put OLTL. I did that too! I hated it and cheered on when it was cancelled. It was sooooo bad, especially in the 90s. Anyway, I will be taking a break from editing as I am very busy at the moment and won't have the extra time to dedicate to it, though I will return in the near future :) Much love <3 Alfredo114 (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Aha. It's fine, it's probably easier to respond on your page as I always check talk pages of people I commune with on Wikipedia. Plus, yours is generally shorter than mine, aha. And yeah, One Life to Live was horrendeous. I'm not upset it was cancelled, it should have gone before Guiding Light and As the World Turns. Both those shows should still be on television. And awe, OK! Enjoy your extra time away! See you when you get back! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Colours edit

Hey - could you hold off on the colour changes until the template is done - I think they can make on change and they will all turn - I was watching various members of Days to see if it does.Rain the 1 00:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I didn't know that could happen, that would be easier as I've been going through pages upon pages changing the colour, trying to get a jumpstart on it. Aha. That would make sense, and hopefully it would just automatically erase the colour already there. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, that is what happened to Ibox 2 and that should mean no one can change the colour on any of the character pages because the option of colour change will be removed. What is your twitter, I'll follow you if you like.Rain the 1 00:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh see, I did not know this. Hopefully that works for all pages using Ibox 1, that should make everything easier on us so we don't have to go through and change. I'm just glad a consensus was finally made to end the arguments. And what's your Twitter? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
If you follow @WikiSoapOpera then I shall follow you.Rain the 1 00:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
OK. Following, but warning I tweet excessively about soap operas in real, US time! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh noes :p - I have just followed you from my official account. :)Rain the 1 00:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Awesome!! Sounds good. Hopefully they can update the Ibox 1 soon, aha. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:58, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
No foloow back? =( & I put a request at the help desk so hopefully it is answered soonish. xRain the 1 01:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I thought I had followed you, wow. Lemme check now, aha. Twitter is a tad bit slow these days, slowly turning over to a new layout. And hopefully it is soonish!! xx. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

New colors edit

Hey MF!! So there's a new color for soap infoboxes?? ARGH!! They change so much!! Should I help with the Y&R ones, or has someone else already done that?? PLEASE let me know I love to help. Creativity97 Talk? 03:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

We reached a consensus so that ALL soap articles share the same colour. And don't change anything right now, we're waiting to see if changing Ibox 1 to include the colour will automatically update the pages. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Days of Our Lives edit

Hi

This edit had to be reverted.

We need to include "present" . It is a standard on all Wikipedia articles (when applicable). Not all readers want to read the text of the article. Readers who never heard about the show, need a quick way to find out if the show is still running or not.

Regards. Farine (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Soap opera pages edit

Hello. I have been browsing the pages for The Young and the Restless and The Bold and the Beautiful, as I see you contribute often to these pages. Sentences aren't worded properly on the Y&R page in many areas. On the B&B page, it is even worse as many paragraphs do not even make sense in that article. It would be best to fix many things on both pages; I am going to look into what I can fix. I will also be looking into what I can fix on the pages for All My Children and Coronation Street. I am merely pointing this out as I am looking for the best interest of Wikipedia. Thank you. BrickHouse337 20:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the heads up. I am always trying to improve the pages as much as possible. I will do my best to get to them. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes as it would be best that they be in good shape. I am currently working on improving the page for Desperate Housewives and pages related to it. Most of that page isn't making much sense either, so I will be fixing that up too. Feel free to help with that but please consult me first as I am working hard on certain aspects of the pages. Thank you. BrickHouse337 00:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I don't watch Desperate Housewives so I won't be touching that. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Terri Colombino as Katie Snyder.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Terri Colombino as Katie Snyder.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 04:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

You're really trying to get soap articles deleted for your personal gain, aren't you? You can say you aren't but I know that's a flat-out lie. I should go and nominate every page you care about for deletion and see how you feel. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 04:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ron Carlivati edit

Hey

Do you know when Ron Carlivati's work will air on GH, have any specified airdate? Here's another question I don't get, Frank Valentini and Ron both started the same day, but Franks episode's of GH started airing on 2/1/12 of this year, so how come Ron's material hasn't aired yet if they started the same day? Wouldn't they have aired on the same episode if they started the same day? Soapfan2013 (talk) 08:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nope, they wouldn't have started on the same day. Ron's material doesn't begin airing until the end of the month, rumoured next week. Wolf/Altman were still under a contract longer than JFP. Valentini was only scheduled to start in January, Carlivati wasn't due to start until later. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Also, I would appreciate you not editing my Sandbox articles. Thank you, those are mine to edit. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

If your talking about that Matt Hunter, you had "The role of Kate Howard is currently being played by Jason Cook" Hello? Why would you post something like that, and I just thought I'd fix it for ya. Soapfan2013 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

It was a mistake because "Hello" I copy/pasted the template from my Kate template. Either way, I'd appreciate you not editing my sandbox pages. They're for myself to edit, sorry. I'm just anal about that kind of stuff. Throws off my groove, is all. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I would imagine Ron would start airing next week since Kristen Alderson and Van Huges will debut crossing over to GH. Do you know how they are gonna introduce Starr on GH since she moved to LA? Soapfan2013 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't know how they're introducing her. I don't look for spoilers. Carlivati I'm sure debuts sometime either next week or the week after. We have to wait for the credits to change since they don't announce those changes. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm so glad that Ron's work started airing today, he did a good job with OLTL during it's past 5 years on the air, I hope they decide to bring more OLTL characters over, oh man I can't wait til the Mannings and McBain arrive in PC, you know John isn't gonna take any crap from Sonny. Soapfan2013 (talk) 06:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah. Not happy with RC. Hated the writing on OLTL and already hate the stuff on GH. I'm not impressed in the least right now that he's on the series, or FV. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at Creativity97's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at Creativity97's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Darnell Williams edit

Hey Musicfreak, Here is an article about darnell William's new character Sarge. It says he has signed a two year deal so that would make this a contract role. Here's the link. http://www.tvguide.com/News/Darnell-Williams-Young-Restless-1043445.aspx. TVFAN24 (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK. That's fine. No need to prove it to me. Also, next time, put the new section below the last one, not above it. Keep it in order. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Days' John and Marlena images edit

Hey Musicfreak7676, I just was wondering if you would consider re-doing the John Black and Marlena Evans images. They are a wee bit too far from their faces and was hoping they'd look more closer, like with Lexie Carver or Nicole DiMera for example. Just a thought, and by the way I hope we can get to know each other better. I edit rarely, though! Thanks for all your hard work. Happy editing! Casanova88 (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I can do that! No problemo! I tried not cutting off their heads, which is what I've been accused of doing in the past, aha. So I wanted to cover my ass on that one. But yeah, I can easily bring them closer!! And yeah, looking forward to it too! Drop by any time!!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Never had an issue with heads "cut off", they are high quality and that literally brings quality to the article. Thanks for doing this, and I see you like Y&R...trying to pick it up since OLTL/AMC is off and I like Darnell Williams yesterday. Y&R looks great and I love Days. Casanova88 (talk) 19:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I once got yelled at since the top of someone's head wasn't in the image. So now I try to include them. That's what I try to bring with my images, bring a higher quality to the articles through the images. Y&R has suffered in years, but DAYS is finally picking up! I've only been watching DAYS since ATWT ended. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, the images look great anyway and add a lot to the articles. Agree about Days, except the overuse of Carrie (so boring!) I've watched the show since the early 90s and never stopped. I loved GL and ATWT, miss GL so much out of all the ended soaps. Casanova88 (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Aw, thank you so much! I pride myself on the images, I really do. Some don't agree with me on my choices, but that's their opinions. And yeah, Carrie needs to be shot and removed. This whole Rafe/Carrie storyline is dumb. I hate it. ATWT was and still is my all-time fav soap opera! Everything about it was so right that it was so wrong! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Rafe and Carrie was SO forced, not even believable. Rafe loves Sami and then meets Carrie and lovers her> Uh, uh, makes no sense. ATWT got better when Reid came on, I loved that character so much and then they killed him! Reid deserved a better ending with Luke. Chemistry was off the map with those two! Well, bye for now. I'm signing off. Hope to speak again soon big guy. Casanova88 (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Rafe/Carrie was forced, though if my husband looked like Patrick Muldoon, I'd go for Rafe as well, ahahah. And ATWT needed Reid. He and Luke were so much better and more secure than he and Noah. I hated that they killed Reid off!! And okay! Speak tomorrow!! :D MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hey Musicfreak7676, I was wondering when you would get the John and Marlena images up. Can you also do Lucas since he's coming back and maybe some others? Again, keep up the great work.Casanova88 (talk) 20:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll do them when I get some time in my schedule. And I'm waiting for new promotional images of Lucas to come out before I could possibly do it. I'm trying my absolute best to get to them in my spare time. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't want to rush you! I apologize! Take your time!Casanova88 (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Please, do not worry about that. I just know there are other articles who need more attention image-wise than Marlena/John, you know? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

GH Main Crew Members edit

I think the main crew members section should be updated, like the directors and breakdown and script writers, half of those people haven't been on lately, I would update them but I can't remember whose on there and whose not, I know I saw Larry Carpenter as one of the directors, Garin and Shelly moved to breakdown once Ron became HW. But that's about it. Soapfan2013 (talk) 09:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'll have to do some research, which I'm sure you could do as well. I think the list is pretty up-to-date for the most part. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:36, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Also, I keep correcting what you've written because you keep writing it grammatically wrong. Your tenses are not correct, and the point of the articles is to keep it as minimal as possible. I'm not doing it to be a prude, but at the same time, the way you want it written is incorrect. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Categories in user space drafts edit

I'm currently going through all of the soap opera characters and putting improvement tags on them, because the majority are a mess. I just did so for the Bold and the Beautiful characters and am preparing to do so for Days of our Lives characters. I noticed that you have two drafts in your user space (User:Musicfreak7676/Sonny_Kiriakis and User:Musicfreak7676/Taylor_Walker_(Days of our Lives)). Since these are not in article space, they shouldn't have categories at this time. I don't want to step on your toes and edit them, so would you please remove the categories from the two drafts. Thanks. AniMate 21:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Which categories are you speaking of? I don't see any categories unless you mean the DAYS bar at the bottom? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Underneath the Days template there are categories "Days of our Lives characters" "Fictional Hispanic and Latino American people" and "Fictional Models". If you'd like I'll remove them myself. AniMate 21:11, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
OH THOSE!! I had no clue what you were speaking of, ahahahaha. Okay, that's fine. I can remove them for you. I apologize. I didn't know that wasn't allowed in the user space. Thank you for explaining and not just removing them. :-) MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
No worries. If and when you move them into the encyclopedia you can always add the categories again. Cheers. AniMate 21:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Just a question, can I put the <> code around it so it doesn't appear? Or should I just remove completely? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
<noinclude></noinclude> might work. AniMate 21:43, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh okay. I just did <!-- --> and they don't appear! I'll keep it all in mind for future articles!! I'm mainly keeping them there until they're notable enough to add. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

On a totally different note, I need to remind you that this is an encyclopedia thus the rules about what we can and cannot say about writers, actors, and producers are different than they are on a fan forum. I've seen posts where you say disparaging things about Diana Degarmo, Maria Arena Bell, and Catherine Bach off the top of my head. Saying someone sucks or is a bad actress isn't acceptable per Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Non-article_space and Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable. If we can't put it in our articles it doesn't belong on our talk pages either. AniMate 22:58, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Latest protection request edit

I semi'ed the cast list page for three weeks. As for the warning, yours sufficed (they don't have to be templated, nor do they have to come from an admin). Since that was the only page they were editing, and they stopped a couple of hours ago, I don't think I need to block them. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK. Thank you. I just know when the rush of incoming cast members and casting changes, people seem to believe they know how to edit such pages. I thank you for semi-protecting it. That should hopefully work! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Apology edit

I think you deserve an apology for all the hard times I've caused with the title sequence section on the GH page. I know my grammer isn't that good, that's cuz I have a learning disability, I do have Aspergers Syndrome as well which is why I get mad at some of the changes you make, I'm only trying to do my share with this. Hope you know that. Soapfan2013 (talk) 05:02, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

And now I feel like an ass because if I had known, I wouldn't have been such a hard ass because I don't take people having disabilities lightly and I seemed like a bully. So I apologize as well. I just try to keep things as grammatically short, and on-point as possible. Soap articles are in enough trouble as it is and I'm just trying to keep things as short and on-point as possible, while sounding correct. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:54, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Don't feel like an ass because I have a disability, yeah I have AS big deal, I also wear braces on my legs, I also was born with rockerchair bottom feet, you didn't know that I had that, it's not your fault, I told you why I have grammer problems, hey I'm just trying to fit in. Soapfan2013 (talk) 21:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I know, but still.. I acted like a complete dick and I shouldn't have regardless. I'm just like a Nazi when it comes to correct English and grammar, it's just how I am, aha. I just would have handled the situation differently, you know? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BelleTriangle01 DAYS.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:BelleTriangle01 DAYS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BelleTriangle02 DAYS.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:BelleTriangle02 DAYS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

New Cole Thornhart Pic edit

Hey

I saw you uploaded a new pic of Van as Cole, but the problem is, that new pic is kinda dark, the other pic was brighter even though it was a clip from OLTL, it showed him better in my opinion, was wondering if we could change it back to the other pic? Just don't know why you would change the pic, the previous pic was of Van from OLTL, it's still the same character and actor, but it's kinda dark man. Can we change it back???Soapfan2013 (talk) 17:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Because it's more updated and actually HD. I say we wait to see if more captures come out. I'm trying to find a cast photo with him and Brandon Buddy. I just felt an HD screencap looked better than an SDTV one. And since GH has better cameras it'd look better. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I think the one that I uploaded was HDTV, but I'll make you a compromise, can we leave the previous one until a better picture comes along? Soapfan2013 (talk) 19:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yours was taken from an HDTV, but OLTL was never filmed in the HD format. And I'll have to think about it. I don't see it as that dark, especially compared to the crappy quality that is Brandon Buddy's image. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:42, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

So it has been confirmed that Hope and Cole have died, they found the bodies on today's show?Soapfan2013 (talk) 21:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

No they have not. Besides, no one ever really dies in a soap opera. ABC Soaps In Depth announced their departures, Van was only on for a short-time anyway since he's doing Broadway. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kinda having a hard time believing that Cole and Hope are actually dead, man they could've bought back Brandon Buddy to play Cole, since Van is doing broadway, no need to kill him off, Van stepped in for Brandon when he couldn't do it for OLTL, wonder why they couldn't bring back Brandon, maybe they can now since Starr is on GH. Have a love triangle between Starr, Cole and Michael. Haha that'd be cool. Soapfan2013 (talk) 02:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Brandon isn't available and lives in NYC. It's why he didn't return this last time. He's unavailable to be in the role. That love triangle would be gross and disgusting. Starr should be single. She should have been single after Cole left. I can't stand everything needed people to be together in soap operas. Also, we can't have these discussions on Wiki. I've already been warned about them. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Is Starr the only one that's gonna crossover permanetly or however you spell it? Or is John McBain gonna be a permanent crossover as well, what about Todd, I'm assuming he's temporary, I know Blair is as well, any word on that???? Soapfan2013 (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is the last time we can discuss this. Blair is only temporary, she's not coming on permanately. I believe McBain is, as well as possibly Todd. Blair is the only one I know of that isn't settling into Port Charles, she's only on for a few episodes. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I knew you were gonna upload a new pic of Roger Howarth as soon as he debuted, LOL in fact I like this one, better than the one I uploaded, and according to TV Guide, Michael Easton will be on contract, now you mentioned a new opening, will it be an updated version of this current opening or a revamped one? By the way I hate this shortened version, the actors go by way to fast. Soapfan2013 (talk) 05:10, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

We don't know what kind of opening it is. GH is keeping it very hush-hush. I suspect it'll be completely new and cheap version, since Valentini is behind it. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Gina Von Amberg edit

Your input is requested at the talk page of List of Days of our Lives cast members. Rm994 (talk) 14:52, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Cole and Hope Thornhart edit

Hey Musicfreak, I have a question. You have two sources explaining Cole and Hope's exits that say they are from Soap Opera Digest, but the link is from an article in ABC Soaps In Depth. I thought you said that using sources from Soaps in Depth are not allowed??? Anyway, that's beside the point but do you feel those two sources are necessary??? TVFAN24 (talk) 22:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

They were necessary because people kept saying they weren't leaving, etc. So I'm leaving it for a few days. That's all. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh I see in a few days you'll remove the sources. OK very well thats all I needed to know. Thanks. TVFAN24 (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Either way, it's there for a reason. I wouldn't source something without reason. And sign your posts, please. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
One more question of Howarth and Easton do you know if they are contract or recurrring?? I already know that Alderson is contract and Depaiva is recurring. TVFAN24 (talk) 23:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
We don't know. I believe McBain is contract and Howarth is unknown. Don't know, hope they're recurring. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Will edit

I've uploaded a new image because the rationale on the old one was useless. Images with poor rationales, lack of fair use etc - they can be removed without arguement. I uploaded a new one and put some fair use, file origin info in it. As for the "clutter" - It is just recentism - why list the current actor and not the others? Something special about the current one? Something more important than the other actors that played the character? If people were really interested in removing clutter - they would. They would do this by removing useless romances and family members which have zero significance to the subject. Where was the discussion for it anyway?Rain the 1 19:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

If it's about removing clutter, why shouldn't it just be the current actor? And if anything, Massey should be listed last since he came in most recently in 2010. We obviously have major differences of views on the situation. I'm stepping back at this point because it's not worth an argument with me, which it will become. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've said before that the article is a mess - so I'm just having a go at some obvious improvements.Rain the 1 19:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Help needed! edit

Hey! I started a little project in my sandbox, it's a decade page for Y&R: List of The Young and the Restless characters (1990-99). I've been working hard on it, I just spent forever organizing most of the characters from the minor characters page in chronological order from when they joined the show. I wrote them all down on paper, I have up till 1992 posted. What I was wondering is if you could help me with organizing the characters. The following is the list I wrote down. The ones with a star (*) next to it means it's already posted.

Walter Barber *
Lille Belle Barber *
Scott Grainger, Jr. *
Molly Carter *
Steve Connelly *
Nathan Hastings, Jr. *
Blade Bladeson *
1994: Luan Volien Abbott
Matt Clark
Keemo Volien Abbott
Doris Collins
Mari Jo Mason
Rick Bladeson
Norman Peterson
Amy Wilson
1995: Sasha Green
Keesha Monroe Winters
Peter Garrett
1996: Timothy Reid
Joshua Landers
Kurt Costner
Tony Viscardi

What I was wondering if you could do is maybe sort out the characters from 1997, 1998 and 1999. I hope I not asking too much. I will be posting all these characters that I haven't done tomorrow, I'm out of time right now. Just let me know if you could help me do that it would be an IMMENSE help, you really have no idea how much you'd be helping me. Let me know! The project is at this link: User:Creativity97/sandbox. Creativity97 22:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I can definitely try to help some later on tonight. I'm a wee bit busy at the moment. But am willing to help at all if I can later on tonight. :) Good job mate! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:05, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!! Let me know what you've done when you've done it. You are really helping me out here. I probably won't be back on until tomorrow so I'll check back then :) Creativity97 23:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi again! Just wanted to let you know that I posted all the characters that I listed above on the page. It took forever! But I think it looks pretty good, take a look if you get a chance. And let me know about sorting the characters from 1997, 1998 and 1999. Also you've been watching Y&R for a long time so maybe you can help clean up some storylines. Just a thought, let me know what you can do :) Creativity97 17:08, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
They're looking alright. I can look things over, though, I was only about six or seven when Y&R aired during 97-99 so I can only try my best. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
That's great. Just so you know I'm done!! I published the article, it's now located at List of The Young and the Restless characters (1990-99). There actually weren't that many from 97-99 so it didn't take me long. But can you still look it over? That'd been great :) Creativity97 18:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

There's one outstanding issue: SoapCentral. That automatically could get the page revoked from being published simply because SoapCentral is not considered a source through WP:V, nor could CBS, but otherwise, it looks fine! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

SoapCentral was a reference used heavily on the minor characters page, that page was never revoked, what's the difference?? I always thought it was reliable, and if it wasn't why weren't the references on the minor characters page removed?? Creativity97 17:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
No one noticed it. But SoapCentral has been deemed, unfortunately, as a fansite. So therefore we must follow the rules. I don't agree with that decision, as I know Dan J. Kroll and know he has the insider sources. But we can't go against previous consensus. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

General Hospital edit

Regarding this edit [3], I think it's a little bit too early to know if the new opening will features only characters from a particular day's episode. After all, the new opening has only aired once. What if the opening for the other days remain the exact same as the one from today with the same characters?

I think it would be best to remove the "only including the characters pertaining to that day's episode" part. Thank you. Farine (talk) 04:08, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

They're keeping the opening to utilize more airtime. Whether it's a permanent solution or not is to be seen. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
This more airtime may be for the commercials. I've heard people saying that the show has ended later than it usually does. But the show no longer has a segment that comes directly after the opening. So I think that the theme was reduced to make room for more commercials, not the show itself. Farine (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Commercial time was normal Farine. The show usually has commercials before they show the promo/credits but this time, they went directly to the credits. It's for more airtime for the show. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
According to the credits that JUST happened, they are updating with characters used in said episode, as the line-up was different and still shorter. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
They showed Alexis and Luke on the opening. But I haven't see either on the episode yet. I have now turned the TV off because I don't watch soap operas. If Luke and Alexis show up on today's episode, I guess it will be fair to say that you're right. Farine (talk) 20:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
They both have. Yesterday was a completely different arrangement. It's to allow for more airtime, and probably until they can shoot and put in Kristen Alderson, Michael Easton and Jen Lilley. Or they're once again re-doing the credits. Yesterday did not include Alexis, I believe it was Mac they put in. And Patrick and Liz. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

That's why I think it would be best do maybe wait a couple of more days. Farine (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Well, either way, the show is airing longer or they are reorganizing since bumpers were removed today. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
JUST CONFIRMED: There is a new opening coming in the next few weeks! [4] MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talk:General_Hospital#Title_sequence edit

I'm proposing some massive cuts to the Title sequence section of the article on General Hospital. As you have recently edited this section, I'm giving you the opportunity to weigh in. AniMate 08:04, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Todd Manning edit

OK first off I don't even know what redundant means ok, 2nd, I'm just trying to update the first line of the Todd Manning article, he's on both shows, I know he's listed on the show below, but come on dude, I'm compromising here, I'm leaving One Life to Live in but also adding General Hospital cuz that is a fictional character that is on General Hospital, I did with Blair Cramer and Starr Manning nobody made a fuss about that, so why are people getting on my butt because I put General Hospital in the first line? I hope I'm not coming up as rude, I just want answers cuz I don't understand man. Soapfan2013 (talk) 20:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Redundant means repetitive of sorts. He originated on One Life so he's from there. He's not from General Hospital like Sonny/Carly/Jason are. That's the difference. And it's wrong on Blair/Starr, too. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah your right sorry, I will change them if I can, Todd, Starr, Blair and John did not originate on GH, only One Life to Live. So I see you're point now. My bad Soapfan2013 (talk) 21:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's a trivial piece of information, but to say that they're directly from both those series isn't right. They're from One Life, and are carrying over (unfortunately) into the land of General Hospital. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree with the IP and Musicfreak7676's reasons for reverting the addition of "from General Hospital" in the first sentence of the Todd Manning article due to the General Hospital information already being present lower in the lead. I don't much care if we say these characters are "from One Life to Live and General Hospital," as long as it's not redundant, since saying they are from both shows is a matter of semantics. What I mean by that is...once General Hospital viewers who weren't regular viewers of One Life to Live get used to these characters, these characters will be "from General Hospital" to them.
Also... Musicfreak7676, I reverted your change of the main image because not only do I feel that the previous image (Soapfan2013's image) is better, it is the image everyone agreed (or semi-agreed) on until I upload a better image. That was the compromise. The last image change caused enough controversy and we don't need more of the same. Flyer22 (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, I disagree with the revert. But it's whatever. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Soapfan2013 edit

Out of curiosity, how have your interactions been with Soapfan2013? I'm fairly certain this is a sockpuppet of the banned User:Onelifefreak2007, and am debating on whether or not to block him or file a report at WP:SPI. AniMate 21:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm unsure AniMate I really do not know. My interactions with Soapfan have been, to say it nicely, bumpy. And even they can admit that. They've used reasons for some things that have not been valid at all. Whether they're a sockpuppet or not, it could be plausible. I don't know enough about the Onelifefreak2007 person. I am not familiar with them. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Looking over that user page, there are A LOT of things similar between that user and Soapfan. And if it is a case of sockpuppeting, which it appears it's been confirmed to be, I'm not going to say whether or not to keep or dispose of them. If anything, I'll say that in the past week or two, Soapfan has been making very small changes to the way they're handling things. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:01, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I think I feel the same as you, and my past with Onelifefreak2007 was bumpy as well (and that's putting it nicely). I'm unsure whether or not this user should be blocked so I've opened Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onelifefreak2007. When you say the Soapfan has been making small changes to his behavior, do you mean positive changes? I'd like to let him continue to edit, but not if he's still the same impossible person to deal with. AniMate 22:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I would definitely say positive. And while they're not the most amazing changes, I do feel as if they're at least making some sort of an effort on their behalf. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:29, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Good enough for me. I'll definitely be leaving it up to others to decide about a block. AniMate 22:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm putting in some two-cents on the discussion page, if that's okay!
Absolutely, that's okay and you did so in the proper place. I feel what you wrote is very fair, and its not always easy to be fair with someone who we've had bad run-ins with. AniMate 23:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I didn't want to be not fair, you know? This is someone's place on Wiki. And I've seen them at least try, unlike other users. You know? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:12, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Onelifefreak2007 edit

Look I was that user, ok I admit to Animate, I wanna continue to edit here and I know I'm taking baby steps, but I will try to improve my behavior, your right I can't prove my point that well or at all, you've been right all along and I should have just listened to you, I want you to help me become a better editor if I'm not blocked for good this time again. If you can't I understand, to me I think you've been helping me out so far, but I need more work. Soapfan2013 (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

If you're not blocked, I am willing to help out yes. But you have to listen more. I was making my case that Kristen had infact had the longer hair, and instead of you trying to prove me wrong, you felt your opinion was all that was required, without proving the fact. And fact would have just settled the argument. If you're not blocked, I will help you. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will listen more, I promise, and like I said, I apologize for all the crap I gave you, this might be my last time I'll talk to you maybe not, if I do get blocked, feel free to email me, I don't know if I'm allowed to give you my email address on here or not but here it is, Onelifefreak2007@gmail.com. I hope we can become friends either way. Soapfan2013 (talk) 00:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Let's see how it goes. Don't be getting all down on yourself. Both AniMate and I (from what I see) agree that you should be allowed to stay. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I'm just really scared that I'm gonna lose this editing privledge, tried to hide it for a few months, and let it be known that Animate finally caught up with me, I tried to stay under his radar but hey it was fun while it lasted. Soapfan2013 (talk) 03:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok it looks like I'm not gonna be blocked haha, boy was I scared, now I don't wanna make the same mistakes again, you think you can help me become a better editor? P.J. (talk) 05:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes I can. We'll start in the morning. I promise you that!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 05:43, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

General Hospital edit

 
Hello, Livelikemusic. You have new messages at Talk:General Hospital.
Message added 08:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ok edit

Ok lets see here, we compromised with Flyer22, and we all came up with a picture of Todd that we can all agree too. I know I shouldn't have changed it back but I thought I was sticking up for you man, I didn't realize they left a message on your talk page. By the way nice picture of Todd good one. How would you feel if I changed the Brandon Buddy pic on the Cole Thornhart article. I can find a good snapshot of him, I got tons of OLTL episodes. How am I doing so far? You said you would help me out? P.J. (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's fine. If I had known about the previous discussion concerning the image of Roger as Todd, I probably would not have changed it. But luckily all is settled now and we have the new main image. And I do feel like Brandon needs a new photograph. That one is horribly lit. You're doing OK, but there's still miles to go of course. And we'll discuss those off of Wikipedia to not clog up talk pages. :-) MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I just uploaded a new pic of Brandon Buddy, it's not perfect but it's alot better than the original one, lemme know what you think, if you don't like it I can get another one P.J. (talk) 22:49, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's really blurry and shouldn't include anyone else. Plus, it should be a bit smaller, too. And his eyes should be seen if we're using a new photograph. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I uploaded a new pic of Brandon Buddy as Cole, it shows his eyes, and it's smaller, but I don't think it's blurry at all, if it's not good than I will upload a new one, I tried to do it by adding it to the Brandon Buddy file that the other person uploaded but it would not work for me, so I reuploaded it a second time with it's own file space. Lemme know whatcha think of it. P.J. (talk) 08:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's better than it was, but I still feel like it could be better. I'm going to do some research for a more HQ capture. Until then, it seems fine! BTW, do you listen to Soap Central Live at all? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:34, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
It could be better, that's was the way the quality of the show was when I downloaded it, it's better I will admit that, at least it's not the opening pic, no I don't listen to Soapcentral Live at all, why? P.J. (talk) 17:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Because I'm going to be on the show tonight, discussing soaps! Ahaha. I booked a call-time. So yay me. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Cool, I won't be listening in cuz my friend he's a Christian rap artist, and he's doing a show tonight at a Church so I'm gonna go with him this afternoon. But congrats man. P.J. (talk) 18:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Can you do me a favor and explain it to me what ABC Family is gonna do with Soapnet I don't quite understand that is happening with that, does that mean that Sopanet will continue or will it still go off the air on March 22. Does that mean that GH, DOOL and Y&R will continue to air or will air on ABC Family now, I don't get it. Cuz I watch GH on Soapnet cuz my internet sucks. P.J. (talk) 19:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I believe, since I posted that information, that ABC Family is integrating the current soap line-up of Soapnet into their regular scheduling programming. And the SCL show will be archived! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:06, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

So all the soaps will be on ABC Family now correct instead of Soapnet correct? P.J. (talk) 21:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't know the full detailing on it. All I know is that a contract has been made to help out with the transition. What the means for the soaps, I do not know. We'll see what happens. ABC Family is the sister channel of ABC. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 21:53, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok I posted something on the talk page of the Van Hughe's image saying what I said a few weeks earlier, I know it's in HD but to be honest, there was nothing wrong with my pic I uploaded nothing, it's a good shot of Cole if you ask me, I can get another one if you want but yours from GH is just too dark man, I'm trying to work this out with you. P.J. (talk) 04:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

My Changes edit

I understand that you have ammended some of my changes on the General Hospital Cast Members page. I apologize for any inconvenience, but I am on the East Coast and if there are any cast changes within the episode, then I edit the page if I have access to the computer. Van Hughes (Cole) had only signed on for 3 episodes, so after the 3, I removed him from the list. This morning, I removed both Emma Samms (Holly) & Tristan Rigers (Robert) who wrapped up their shirt stints in the 3/8 episode. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ackgh73994 (talkcontribs) 14:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello!! edit

Hey!! I'm back! But only part-time, still quite busy with work :) Just wanted to stop by and say hi. I've thought about starting some editing in and around soaps, I'm going to see if I can clean up some of the All My Children page, maybe even add some things as I did watch for 17 years. Anyway enough about me, how are you? Jeez I miss talking to you, my schedule is so busy but I've decided to make just enough time to work on Wiki. I missed it, but just didn't have the time :) Any more nasty disputes lately? Get back to me, love to chat <3 Alfredo114 (talk) 01:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Not any huge disputes, really. Just concentrating on bettering articles is all! Been a tad busy for editing, too. I hope all is well with you! If you need anything, let me know! I hope you're doing okay!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:33, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

As 15878 edit

This user again vandalized the General Hospital cast page. He is adding names that are returning with no sources. I thought you warned him already. I thought I'd let you know. TVFAN24 (talk) 22:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dude, freakin' warn him or report him. Don't be a lazy user and just do nothing but come to me. Seriously. Yo ALWAYS do this. Instead of doing the work yourself, you come to me to do it. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Robert Scorpio edit

Hi Musicfreak (can I call you that without 7676?) I was a wee concerned about the Robert Scorpio image because it's a little dark. I was wondering if you could work your magic with this image http://cdn.media.abc.go.com/m/images/image-util/624x351/8c1269ec79b6104bfa213d982e989569.jpg and use that? It's just a thought. Hope you are doing well (and where are those John and Marlena picks boy?! I'm just kidding.) I revamped the Aubrey Wentworth, Cara Castillo, Katie Peretti, Christopher Hughes II, Lily Walsh Snyder, and Holden Snyder articles and was wondering if you'd do some input. Casanova88 (talk) 19:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Those pages look good, from the ATWT focus. I know I'm busy re-doing another ATWT page on my own to make it better. I have plans for new Holden/Lily images as well! I have them set and just need to upload them! And I can definitely work with that Robert image, and GH is general dark in general. Not many light screencaps for that series. Marlena/John are on-hold since I don't see it as that much of an urgent change since they're already there. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I just uploaded a Holden image, I think it looks good but whatever is fine as long as there's no network logo - I hate logos in images! Grr. That's fine with John/Marlena. Thanks for considering working with the new Robert image. Agree with GH being dark and also appreciate your work. Casanova88 (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Holden image I have is from the same shoot you used, but he's smiling in the image. It's an actual cast image. And network logos don't bother me in screencaps, not at all. Doesn't bother me. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Do these Holden/Lily images have logos? I really kind of hope not, I mean no offense! I also prefer promotional photos to screen caps also. I also like your Abby, Billie and Lucas images, I think all your images like those are these best you upload. I really value a well-worked on article like I have been doing and will continue to do that because they've been neglected, especially ATWT and GL. Casanova88 (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nope. Holden/Lily images are from photoshoots, so they pertain no logos. And I think for contracted cast members, cast promotional images take hold over screencaptures. I find they're a much more professional look. And aw, thanks. I try! That's all I do, is try! I know some people don't find my photos to be as nice or as good as they should be. But I can't satisfy everyone. I do the best I can. I know my main focus of GL and ATWT. I love those series. Hope we can work together on those articles. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hey, you deserve it because you make sure things are in 100% shape! I started editing then took a break to learn about wiki and came back and I hope I'm doing good at it. LOVE your Lily pics. I never thought Noelle Beck was that bad, it stung that Martha left and Noelle did a good job. Just thought I'd add that. I'm departing now, so I'll talk soon! Hope to work with you soon! Casanova88 (talk) 20:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

LOL. I'm just trying to better pages and make them look nice. And if people don't like it, then they don't. Nothing I can do but keep doing what I do, aha. And thanks. Both pictures, in my opinion, look much better and better the article especially with the work you've done to them! And I wasn't a fan of Beck's portrayal just because I loved Byrne and found it sad they left her walk. And yeah, keep in touch Casanova!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

America's Next Top Model Cycle 18 edit

Hi MusicFreak,

I was wondering if you could do me a favor since I am not familiar on how to do this. Can you please check over all of the configurations in the Call Out Order Chart b/c the cells are off. I'd really appreciate it if you could figure it out. I've tried and I can't fix it and its been bugging me. If you or someone you know is good at that, please ask them. Thanks so much. TVFAN24 (talk) 05:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

How are they off? They look fine to me. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The extra border to the right. I think someone put in the wrong mesurements. It's happened before and someone fixed it. TVFAN24 (talk) 22:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I don't see an extra border. I think someone removed it. It looks fine to me. Also, be careful in your editing. You kind of removed the title of your message. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Socks you found edit

Hmm. I'll submit this to SPI. Can you give me a couple diffs that make the point even better? Daniel Case (talk) 02:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I know they edit Lisa Niles continually saying "2012-present" and they keep editing/removing Kodi Kitchen and replacing her with Lisa Niles/Brianna Brown on the List of General Hospital cast members. And their profiles/member pages have "random" things added to them. Plus, their name is mostly the same minus the #'s. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:55, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I blocked User:71.250.134.58 for the next year, and opened the SPI. Daniel Case (talk) 04:23, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I just blocked the IP you'd been warning for 24 hours per your note. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Daniel, it's quite tedious having to continually undo their edits. The actress isn't returning, so I don't know why they'd keep doing it. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 19 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Storm & Grace, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fran Healy and Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

LMP Singles edit

I was thinking about creating pages for her singles. I don't have a lot of time now, you seem to know LMP would love your help.JGG59 (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

We could see, but I don't believe any of her singles charted, and I know for a fact songs can't have pages unless they've charted. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I still don't get your Brianna Brown edit edit

Dude

Wouldn't it make more sense to have her duration 2010-2011 instead of 2010-2011, 2011? I mean it's the same year, so why have it listed twice even though she left and came back, it's still the same year, now I would understand if she was still playing it today and left in a few weeks or so, than you could have it 2010-2011, 2011-2012, but dude she came back and left before the year was over, so it would make sense to have it listed as 2010-2011. Do you see what I'm saying, having 2011 listed twice like that does not make sense. Not to me anywayz. P.J. (talk) 05:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dude (never start something like that with me, that shows major attitude.)
Brianna Brown left the series in 2011 and returned later the year. So yes it is 2010-2011, 2011. I see, but that's not how it works PJ. The way it is is how it should stay. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hope Brady/John Black edit

Your input is requested at the talk page of Hope Brady or John Black (Days of our Lives). Rm994 (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!! Will go now! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Advice about the Lisa Niles fan edit

Daniel Case has blocked the IP and I have protected the cast list and Lisa Niles. However, I don't think you're dealing with them the right way. Using exclamation marks, bold text, and caps are all ways to express anger. However, when someone is so obsessed with adding something in, we need to think about why. Perhaps this is someone who desperately believes that Lisa Niles will return to GH. My guess is that this is actually someone who is doing this to make you mad. The first time it was probably just simple vandalism, but I really think your reactions are fueling this. There's an essay at WP:Deny recognition you should reed. Another shortcut to it is WP:Do not feed the trolls. By leaving increasingly angry messages for this person, you're feeding them exactly what they crave. Should this crop up again, just leave a final warning with no editorializing. Should they vandalize after that warning, drop a note at WP:AIV or at WP:RFPP to report the user or get the effected articles protected. It's simple. Once you stop getting angry and reacting angrily, this becomes a simple, routine process that's much less fun for the person vandalizing. AniMate 05:17, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but I'm the type of person where if you ignore the initial warning(s), I start getting pissed because I'm tired of cleaning up the mess. It takes time out of my own day. I'll try and read those things when/if I even have time. And I've gone to those pages and everything has been ignored. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I know it can incredibly frustrating. Still you getting mad is exactly what this person wants. They're seeking attention and reactions and you're giving them both. Stay calm, revert, and report. AniMate 00:52, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I do revert and report and that does zero. So I get impatient with the people. You have one chance with me being nice, possibly two. After that, you're done. It's how I've been in my life. But luckily that person(s) is gone and the pages are locked. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Soapnet edit

Hey

Apparently my cable company isn't the one that's broadcasting Disney Junior yet, hopefully not for along while, so and I read on the Soapnet article that it's gonna go do an automated schedule, does that mean they are not gonna show new episodes of General Hospital at night now or what? Why would they do that if ABC Family has taken over it's operations? I hope tomorrow I can watch General Hospital on Soapnet cuz if it changes to Disney Junior I'm gonna be ticked off, and I'm sorry about the last message I sent ya, I just typed that subject cuz I didn't know what to put in the headline you know, sorry if you took it the wrong way. P.J. (talk) 03:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I honestly don't know. I don't watch SOAPNet. I watch the soaps live during their airing times, in HDTV. I could care if SOAPnet goes off air. Disney Junior takes over next month I believe. I don't know the specifics. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 03:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Infobox image sizes change edit

Hey Musicfreak, I just went to the soap opera infobox talk page and the Soap Project page to offer my take in the lack of consensus for changing the image sizes. I am very discouraged about how it was changed BEFORE a conversation took place. Just because 2-3 editors took part in it does not mean the sizes should be changed from 240px to 200px - which is incredibly too small. It was astonishing that the change was made so quickly without anyone discussing the matter or at the very least being warned about the change in advance.Casanova88 (talk) 16:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

My exact point that was made. I'm just now making main images for the current portrayer bigger. The reason given? It's how it is done on the Info box 2 template for UK/AU soaps, which don't even get me started on. I'm trying to get it over-ridden. But no one is listening!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:41, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Infobox 1 was made for US soaps, infobox 2 was made for UK soaps. There is a difference because that was what was decided. One editor initiated the change, then another posted the comment in the talk page, then it was done without blinking an eye and no one even knowing that the issue was even brought up. This is very frustrating. Casanova88 (talk) 16:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
THAT'S EXACTLY MY POINT! I understand making the colour uniform, but image sizes too? This is why I'm trying to make a third info box to single out the other two. But no one wants it, claiming it'll be too confusing. EXACTLY! No one lets anyone know what's going on and it was a one-sided change. There was no consensus. And I am not happy. I'd settle for 220px. But not 200px. That's too small. The Info box was never stretched. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
It wasn't made for US soaps at all. Infobox 2 appeared after WP:EE adopted it for use in the articles - it was sucessful too. Then it was adopted by other UK soap projects, Australian ones, New Zealand. The common theme is that US use the first infobox (My view: because it fits fandom intentions) - that isn't mandatory though. If "no one knew" about the proposal then it is on their head. It was raised at the project page, where participants are free to visit.Rain the 1 17:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry but that excuse is bull that "it's open to discuss", etc. If no one was replying, you should have opened it up to others by going to their pages and notified them of said discussion. I am not pleased with this at all, in fact, I'm quite disgusted. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:02, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Raintheone, the reason why no one knew was that the change was made before a proper discussion and only then did editors realize the change. Bottom line is that these separate infoboxes are used and there was no issue raised until your proposal. I am not saying that it should have been left alone but since you began the discussion, proper time should have been given to discuss the matter and solidify the differentiation between the infoboxes. In my opinion, no change should have been made because 200px is too small and 240px was satisfactory. Casanova88 (talk) 17:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Can we move this discuss to the WikiSoap Project? LOL. And Casanova, do you have e-mail so we can talk off of the board? E-mail me or something so we can talk! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this should be moved to the proper page so that Musicfreak's talk page does not get so full. Casanova88 (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes please, it's already getting full. Aha. And it's not time for me to archive anything. BTW, Casanova, did you e-mail me? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Good idea, but first a reply - Due to the zero replies the discussion received, I thought it was safe to assume no one was interested. I did not kick up a fuss and left it at what it was. You can call perfectly good reasons "bull" if you wish. Go on Casanova, give him your email so you can plan ahead - maybe you will both put some thought into what you say. ;) It is the same old story though, you oppose every son and their mother - but fail to provide any wikipedia guideline or policy behind your thought.Rain the 1 17:29, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Whatever. I'm done. Do what you want since that's what you always do, is do what you want and when you want it. I'm through. I'm done playing games with editors. Please do not post on my talk page again, thank you! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 17:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Sorry to write here again, but Raintheone, there is no need to assume we're going to revolt against one another because we disagree on several things. I have put much thought into my points so please let's take a breather and calm down. Let's just be a little more understanding. Musicfreak and I disagree with what has been done and I do not oppose everything, actually I oppose nothing since this is the first time in a long time that I've been editing lately. Please, let's not take this to a negative place. Casanova88 (talk) 17:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Carmine edit

Hey!! I was just wondering if you knew anything cuz I wanted to add this new Carmine character to the 2012 Y&R character page, but there's zero info on him anywhere. Would you possibly know or heard something about who portrays him or his casting info?? Because if he's going to be on for a few episodes I feel he should be added to the 2012 page. Let me know. Also I don't mean to step out of line with the talk about soaps but what did you think of the all the reuniting? Jeff/Gloria and Kevin/Chloe! I think Gloria was too nice to Angelo in the end. Very happy that Kevin/Chloe are together again; finally! I also heard that William Bardwell may be Chelsea's father and not Jeffrey. Anyway let me know if you have or heard any of that info. Creativity97 23:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The casting is Marco Drapper. And I believe it's only a temporary role. Nothing too serious. I don't know much about the role since SOD/SID never reported the casting. I've heard nothing pertaining to Chelsea's paternity and I won't until the show. I don't look at spoilers and not really invested in Y&R anymore. It's boring me. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Okay thanks. Do you still watch Y&R or just every once and awhile now? It's not really boring me, it's still my guilty pleasure :) Anyway thanks again for that info, is there a specific place you read that? Just wondering cuz if it was a webpage it might be a good source. Let me know. Creativity97 01:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I watch it everyday but it bores me. The writing is horrific and the casting decisions are bad. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 01:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
haha miss you guys! :)....yes, MAB is a "@$@**#" and ruined Y&R lol the writing is bad. I only watch for Sharon. I'm so glad Shick are having this lead-up and PhyHO is all angry :-D gets me excited. I only watch her scenes, i love how they are making her this businesswomen :) Stand on her own two feet and good riddance she left that skunk Adam. I dont watch B&B i watch DOOLL though :D I'm on JLo watch now, she has a new song coming out in a few days and I'm so bloody excited! −Arrekea(Talk) 08:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
OH AND MF i just saw your twitter and realized you are a RINGER fan too!!!! :D I LOVE THAT SHOW SO much. x −Arrekea(Talk) 08:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nikki is about the only thing I love about Y&R right now, even if she isn't a current lush. And Arre, you aren't missing much on B&B other than the silver anniversary show. I'm starting a new page for Caroline Spencer, who is not a junior despite other's objections. And DAYS owns my heart right now. Everything about that show is pure soap opera!
And yes Arre, I am OBSESSED with Ringer. We better get a renewal, especially after last night!! MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

First of all, do not issue threats to me. Second of all, in your page, you have already outlined a new page for character "Caroline Spencer" when the character has not even debuted yet. I expect you're going public with the page pretty soon after the character has debuted, right? And in the meantime you are telling that a page for Y&R's Genevieve Atkinson cannot be created? See how the logic is not really adding up? And to answer your next question: Yes, they CAN be compared to oneanother. I haven't disagreed with anything you have done in Wikipedia, so I do no understand why you must argue everyhting that I do. Allukka 17:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allukka (talkcontribs)

Actors & Actresses Status edit

Hey Musicfreak,

I was wondering if you could tell me if Mattson on GH is contract or recurring as well as Todd and Yancy on Days??? Thanks. TVFAN24 (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

If you checked the links that are provided, they tell you: recurring. LOL. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 19:30, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply