Links to draft articles edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Devil's Night: Dawn of the Nain Rouge. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:36, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Wikishovel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 18:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 21:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ammar-Nemo.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Ammar-Nemo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/279251861_655039495526245_6027593161211521361_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296&_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5f2048&_nc_ohc=93_BbnbXSp8AX9X5zKT&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-2.xx&oh=00_AfD7jNl6QJYQ7_ywB2QoayNXoqR7cj035AUZLGbcMPQG0w&oe=65F62473 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 22:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ammar Nemo for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ammar Nemo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Nemo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Wikishovel, I am wondering why you want to delete my wikipedia page for Ammar Nemo. LionelTechTips (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ammar Nemo, you may be blocked from editing. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 21:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am not the person vandalizing Ammar Nemo, the person who is on the other hand is User:Wikishovel, he keeps deleting my work for no good reason and adding completely irrelevant stuff. LionelTechTips (talk) 21:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you keep making this personal attack I will block you. Doug Weller talk 21:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have not said 1 thing about you User:Doug Weller besides this. LionelTechTips (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I thought it was clear I meant User:Wikishovel. Doug Weller talk 08:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for continued personal attacks and reporting editors for vandalism incorrectly. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 09:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Doug Weller talk 11:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply