Lingamondo
|
you may have chosen to ignore the above template, but I do recommend you read the "Build consensus • Resolve dispute" bit at least before you continue revert-warring. The burden for establishing consensus for your proposed edits lie with you. Especially since they appear to be completely confused and without the least understanding of the article scopes as stated. There is no other way I can conceive of your insistence to place a map of the distribution of current Germanic languages in Europe in the Germanic peoples article. --dab (𒁳) 13:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Not the issue
editHi. The problem with the article is not what it includes, but that it adds nothing relevant: aside from the trivail and coatracky table (how do economic data etc. relate to the fact that x language is spoken?), all the relevant info would duplicate Romance languages and Latin Europe. This is per the rationale I explained: the entire article is a content fork. Also note that a merger had already been proposed in the Latin Europe article. Dahn (talk) 13:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Germanic-speaking world for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Germanic-speaking world until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.