Your submission at Articles for creation: E-Library (February 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Librarian-Mlib! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:E-Library has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:E-Library. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the honest insight. I apologize for the unintentional yet evident mistake. Looking forward to create more contents that are free from such errors and educate individuals.
Regards, Librarian-Mlib (talk) 11:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corporate English (February 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
You might be interested in this: Wikipedia:Large language models, given that both of your drafts, the above, and Draft:E-Library are detected as GPT-generated content. – robertsky (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I strongly disagree that e-library is GPT generated, as I have spent almost 3 weeks to draft and edit the contents for E-library, referring various links. The second draft maybe GPT generated as you claim, because the idea is almost similar to what you get after asking GPT. I shall reconsider the contents for the Corporate English, but the accusation regarding e-library is lame. Thank you for your insight. Librarian-Mlib (talk) 08:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Corporate English edit

  Hello, Librarian-Mlib. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Corporate English, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:E-Library edit

  Hello, Librarian-Mlib. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:E-Library, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply