Welcome! edit

Hello, Lexyacc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Blythwood (talk) 23:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Learn These Words First article edit

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I’ve just read it and I’m a bit concerned that it has no citations. That worries me since without proof that this topic is notable, meaning covered enough in media for it to be possible to write a fair article on the topic, the article may get deleted.

Are there any reliable sources on the topic that you can add? If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool, or if you have any thoughts or questions just let me know. Blythwood (talk) 23:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Learn These Words First edit

Hello, Lexyacc,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Learn These Words First should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learn These Words First .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 23:45, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Lexyacc! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:19, Tuesday, August 16, 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Multi-layer dictionary (September 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 02:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Lexyacc, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 02:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hi, (@Zppix:)

Thanks for reviewing my "Multi-layer dictionary" article.

I got your message that "the submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources" and "much of the submission is unsourced."

Could you give me a little more info about how you would like to see the referencing improved?

Here are the references I used:

  • Atkins, B. and M. Rundell. The Oxford Guide to Practical Lexicography, 2008: Oxford University Press. = This book is a standard lexicography reference with a good section about monolingual learner's dictionaries.
  • Bullock, D. 'NSM + LDOCE: A Non-Circular Dictionary of English', International Journal of Lexicography, 24/2, 2011: 226-240 (link). = This journal article covers the NSM-based/multi-layer dictionary concept extensively. Oxford's International Journal of Lexicography is the main academic journal about dictionaries.
  • Links to two pages on http://learnthesewordsfirst.com = I think the "Learn These Words First" dictionary is a good example that clarifies what multi-layer dictionaries look like, and I wanted to attribute some of the bullet points to that website. Should I use a different format for referencing a website?
  • Wierzbicka, A. 'Common language of all people: The innate language of thought', Problems of Information Transmission, 47/4, 2011: 378–397 (Appendix B). = Anna Wierzbicka (central NSM researcher) devotes Appendix B of this journal article to NSM+LDOCE and the application of multi-layer dictionaries to ESL, linguistics and translation.
  • I also have a couple other journal articles about NSM-based/multi-layer dictionaries, but I did not use them because the articles are in Mandarin and Arabic. Can I cite these anyway?

Do you think I need better references? Or do all the references need to be available online?

Do you feel some of the paragraphs need better support? Which paragraphs?

(Note: The "multi-layer dictionary" topic is also referred to as "multi-level dictionary", "non-circular dictionary", "NSM-based dictionary" or just "NSM+LDOCE".)

Hoping to improve this article. Thanks for your help.

Best regards. Lexyacc (talk) 22:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Multi-layer dictionary edit

 

Hello, Lexyacc. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Multi-layer dictionary".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:31, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply