Lewistheram1991
|
Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Stop by the Teahouse anytime!
edit
|
Hello! Lewistheram1991,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! SarahStierch (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Abdul Gaddy for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Gaddy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Gaddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 08:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Abdul Gaddy
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Abdul Gaddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Secret account 06:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
editHello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Message sent with Global message delivery.
What did I do now? I had a wikipedia account and Kuru blocked it! Why?
Lewistheram1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all I had a wikipedia account under Lewistheram1991 and my reason is why am I blocked for that I know darn well I had a wikipedia account, I didn't do nothing and I wonder know why I'm block until further notice? Just because I haven't been using this account doesn't mean they should block me, plus I never did a sock puppetry just because I haven't use Lewistheram1991 in 5 years, so I shouldn't have to be blocked for a reason.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 20:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
But why? I don't understand why I'm blocked I had a wikipedia account with Lewistheram1991 then about 10 minutes later I was blocked and I wasn't using multiple accounts
Lewistheram1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I really like to know how can I be unblocked without using multiple accounts and is there something you can do about it because I have no accounts left remaining so what can I do?
Decline reason:
"I have no accounts left" So you admit you've been using multiple accounts? As stated above, it's been verified you're socking. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lewistheram1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes I did been using multiple account but I just want to create another account with using a sock puppet because this is all I have left because the Lewisthejayhawk account I've been doing that for 4 years until I'm blocked from that one, so I don't have wikipedia account because all of my wikipedia has been blocked since then
Decline reason:
You should request unblock only on your original account. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lewistheram1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18257 was submitted on May 11, 2017 18:22:10. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Lewistheram1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I try that that user name and now I can't use it because I did something inappropriate on my talk page and so this is the only account I got left, so there is a way can you unblocked it because this is all I have left the rest of my other has been blocked and I can't use my talk page. Please I need this because this is very important
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 23:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I'll revoke talk page access here, too. This is a waste of time. Huon (talk) 23:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Lewistheram1991 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18890 was submitted on Aug 02, 2017 06:11:20. This review is now closed.