Lewismash
Welcome!
edit
|
March 2011
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lewis Marklin Mash has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfIgQaQypAY, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzl_g8VBu_I. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Scientizzle 20:49, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ADHDtv is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADHDtv until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Scientizzle 15:49, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
edit Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADHDtv. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Nate • (chatter) 06:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. — Scientizzle 21:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
editThis and this are completely inappropriate. You cannot make personal attacks and you certainly can't make menacing implications about violence.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Scientizzle 21:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- FYI, this block is currently being reviewed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive828#Block review: Lewismash — Scientizzle 00:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Lewismash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is a very cold and rude site. I never threatened Nate with violence. Your editors ASSUMED that I meant violence. I was just trying to enter an article of importance on your site. There are real people out there who value the information, but these people seem to be Nazi's with purposes I do not fully understand, who gang up on new contributors and debase their entries. I was just following the templet of Alexa Demara, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexa_Demara, who was a cast member of the show. I never even had an interest in creating a wikipedia site, but she made such a big deal about it, and I decided to create a stupid page, but I had no idea that it would become such an ordeal. I will see if she can make the stinking thing. She is not the most famous cast member on the show, and yet no one, at least to my knowledge has given her the same grief, even though she has only been on a segment of Extra for 30 seconds one time and an FHM article. I checked her links, and none of them lead to anything about her, yet that is what was complained about on mine. The largest credit that she has is ADHDtv. Also, NATE kept saying that my article was "self Promotion" because my account name was the same name as the person in the article, yet on her page, as well as Joahanna Krupa, AKON and several other pages, I notice external links to the persons Facebook, Myspace and website. My page has none of that, so why was my page considered self promotion? In fact, Akon's page is an obvious promoters bio, probably created by someone at the record label to promote AKON's career. Why such a double standard? I don't care if you reinstate me, because I will never use this site again, but if you are smart and if you are wise, you will pay attention to what I have written, and start being more fair with people and stop being so hateful. Thank you. Lewismash (talk) 05:56, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The block is appropriate; your continued nastiness is unwelcome here. --jpgordon::==( o ) 07:30, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.