Lagalag

Vanishing

I don't see where WP:U nor meta:Right to vanish mention removing one's signature from talk pages. I've left Talk:Saxophone alone for now, but be aware that your edits (and user name) will remain in the page history (as it will for all other Wikipedia articles). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't get it, sorry...

Hello there, i noticed this edit and here, and I'm not sure why you removed it. What is the connection between WP:U? Sorry if I have missed something obvious. Kind regards and happy editing. --Merbabu 01:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Eric Scheibeler

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Eric Scheibeler, by 75.73.188.53 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Eric Scheibeler fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

This biography violates notability guidelines

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Eric Scheibeler, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon Ramon Aboitiz

The article Jon Ramon Aboitiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable long unreferenced BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Anastacio de Alba for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anastacio de Alba is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastacio de Alba until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bleubeatle (talk) 06:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Tumasek listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tumasek. Since you had some involvement with the Tumasek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 05:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Karen Loren Agustin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Loren Agustin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Loren Agustin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 20:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Panicucci

The article Panicucci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable surname. Sources not reliable - genealogy sites. Not suitable as redirect as only one article title contains the name.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Philippine Americans listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philippine Americans. Since you had some involvement with the Philippine Americans redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist (talk) 16:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)