Klueska
Hello, thanks for signing up to be my reviewer, article will be more complete tonight.
DYK for Ho v. Taflove edit
 | On 1 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ho v. Taflove, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that, according to Ho v. Taflove, ideas are not subject to protection under copyright law of the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ho v. Taflove.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 15:14, 1 December 2011 (UTC) 16:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
United States v. Nosal edit
Hi Kevin,
Thank you for signing up to review my article (US v Nosal). I have now moved the artcle United States v. Nosal to the public space and it is ready for first review.
Best regards, - Arild — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stromhylden (talk • contribs) 20:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2 edit
Hi. When you recently edited CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Relaying (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Did You Know Notification Issues for your Article edit
Hey Klueska,
After submitting your DYK nomination I got a few comments back from wikipedia editors. One of them is an automated Copyright violations and close paraphrasing alert, seems to have flagged a page here: http://web.archive.org/web/20010219021902/http://www.netlitigation.com/netlitigation/cases/compucase.htm
I'm not sure if used this page and forgot to cite it or something else is going on, maybe one of your sources pulled from that website? I'd take a look at the issues listed here:
Template:Did_you_know_nominations/CompuServe_Inc._v._Cyber_Promotions,_Inc.
DYK for CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc. edit
| | On 16 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc., which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc. was one of the first cases to apply United States tort law to restrict spamming on computer networks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc..You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit
|