Your submission at Articles for creation: Wedding Cake House (Providence, Rhode Island) has been accepted edit

 
Wedding Cake House (Providence, Rhode Island), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- Aunva6talk - contribs 21:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Explaining edit

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Fortunio (novel) edit

Hello, Klibes,

Thank you for creating Fortunio (novel).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Per Wikipedia's verifiability policy, all articles should be cited in some way to reliable sources. I encourage you to search for, and add, reliable sources to your creation; otherwise, uncited content may be challenged and removed. Happy editing!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ComplexRational (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hannah Battersby has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hannah Battersby. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:38, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hannah Battersby has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hannah Battersby. Thanks! Tagishsimon (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Battersby has been accepted edit

 
Hannah Battersby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tagishsimon (talk) 20:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply