Kirukp

Kirukp, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Kirukp! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

In response to your feedback

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages. If you have a question to ask me, please do not hesitate to tell me on my talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 17:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

 

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kirukp. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by SarahStierch (talk) 21:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Hi Kirukp, I saw your question at the Tea House and thought I would give you an update: as of now (the date and time after my signature), there are 302 articles in the queue altogether, and yours is about no. 100. Another day or so, perhaps two. David_FLXD (Talk) ^{Review me} 03:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Thats nice, thank you :) Kirukp (talk) 14:23, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Review Raja article

Hi Kirukp, I took a look at your article (now about no. 65 in the queue, before you ask!). There is no doubt that Review Raja is notable, so that is good: Wikipedia will want to have an article about him. Your sources are very good (except YouTube!); the three Indian newspapers are excellent sources. (Overall, your sources are FAR better than we usually get on a new article first time out!)

However, the article is a little short, and does not follow the guidelines for a biography of a living person. You should have a clearer structure for the article, and you should include an Infobox. Last first, the easiest way to do the infobox is to make a copy from another bio page. Any person's bio article, go into edit and COPY the whole infobox from {{ to }} and paste it into your article. Then just edit all the info for the person who is your topic. If there is anything you don't know, just leave it blank and the infobox will automatically not display that line. Secondly, structure. Your lead paragraph is good, it explains why Review Raja is notable. After that it is usual to say something about the person's early life and education, then something about their career, especially as it relates to why they are now notable, and then perhaps list some of the awards or recognition that they have been given.

I suggest you keep on working on it rather than just let it sit in the queue untouched. When it comes to a reviewer, it should look better than it does now, then it will have a better chance of being accepted. If you need to know anything more, you can ask me on my talk page. David_FLXD (Talk) ^{Review me} 16:59, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi David_FLXD, I really appreciate it. Your inputs were very helpful indeed. I did try some additions like infobox/ image but I am afraid I don't have anymore info to add. Whatever details I have provided were collected from the Internet itself. However I would get more details from the person(Review Raja) himself once this article is online. Please advise if I could do anything else.

One more thing, I can't figure out how to take this discussion into your talk page. I clicked the talk page link but its confusing. Please help.Kirukp (talk) 12:35, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Review Raja.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kirukp. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 07:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kirukp. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ariconte (talk) 09:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Messages from Anne Delong

Dear Kirukp: I saw the discussion at the Tea House about your Review Raja page. I checked out what you had written, because I had recently tagged the other Review Raja page for being more like a fan site than an encyclopedia article. I notice that there are some items and references on your page that aren't on the other one - for example the information about the rickshaw contest. I hope that you will contribute to the other page, because it could use some rewriting. —Anne Delong (talk) 19:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Anne Delong, Thanks for writing. I was at first heartbroken to find that someone already published the same article. But while reading it now I think it is much better than what I had prepared. Yes, as you said there were some additional references in my article. I had deleted my article few days back. However I will try and collect those links again to contribute the existing page.

I am a beginner here so trying to explore few things like 'how to add photos to an article?', 'what sort of photos are allowed?' etc. For example can we add photos of Review Raja meeting celebrities, his visit to a film production house, etc., ? Regards,Kirukp (talk) 12:22, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, I did some edit in the Review Raja page and it is now online. Doesn't anyone review my edit before making it online? I am trying to understand how this works. Please advise.Kirukp (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Dear Kirukp: Even though you have deleted the text from your Review Raja page, it is not really gone. You just have to look back in the page history. Here's a link:[1].

Anyone can edit Wikipedia at any time, unless he or she has been blocked for bad behaviour. Of course, that means that anyone can undo other people's edits at any time, too. When you edit a page there's an option to "watch" the page. So, if someone is watching "Review Raja" and feels that your addition is incorrect or improper, they can remove it. That's why it's important to have references to back up what you enter. So go ahead and edit some articles! Just make sure that you back up what you add with references, and use the "show preview" to make sure that you aren't messing up the format.

Anyone with a login and password can create a page without going through the review process. The problem is, if you don't know what you are doing, your article may be deleted very quickly by other editors. Going through the review process is usually enlightening; if there hadn't already been an article with the same name, the reviewers would have told you what you needed to do to be sure that your article was acceptable. I sometimes still submit an article to the review process if I'm not sure if the subject is "notable" enough. Hope this helps.—Anne Delong (talk) 16:43, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Photos

Dear Kirukp: When uploading photos, you can't use anything that's copyright. If you took the pictures yourself, or if the photographer donates the photo to Wikipedia, your are okay. Otherwise it's not legal and the photo will be deleted. By the way, I realize that I added my original message to your User page instead of the talk page. Since you may want to use your page for something else, I'm going to move this whole thread over to your talk page. —Anne Delong (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

The Teahouse Turns One!

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)