Hello, King Floyd the Great! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

May 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Legality of cannabis by country, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 20:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

It's legal in the Netherlands. Just search for it on the Internet. They buy it in coffieshops - next like a wine monopoly, where we buy the wine. King Floyd the Great (talk) 12:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Scottish Bulldog (disambiguation) edit

 

The article Scottish Bulldog (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

uneeded Disambiguation page, only one article with the name.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 00:14, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Turid Thomassen edit

 

A tag has been placed on Turid Thomassen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Train2104 (talkcontribscount) 20:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

  This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Down syndrome, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SQGibbon (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Everything that I've written is true. You're just a retarded idiot administrator, and I don't give a shit what you say! At the Norwegian Wikipedia, I've created tens of sockpuppet accounts, and I'll do the same here if you block me! --King Floyd the Great (talk) 17:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply