Your submission at Articles for creation: John Pollock (April 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! JudiPCook, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:49, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:John L. Pollock has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John L. Pollock. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:John C. Pollock has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John C. Pollock. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Community Structure Theory has been accepted edit

 
Community Structure Theory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John C. Pollock (April 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StarryGrandma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
StarryGrandma (talk) 04:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John C. Pollock (July 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl | talk 20:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John C. Pollock (August 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 02:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:John C. Pollock has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John C. Pollock. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

John C. Pollock edit

Hi your article about yourself is now published. I don't know why it was held up in WP:AFC. You clearly have a WP:COI. You should disclose the fact that you wrote this article and the other one. We like a bit of honesty of editors. Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 11:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Scope_creep(talk). The bio and the community structure article were written by me: JudiPCook. These two articles were the first I've written for Wikipedia. If I've done something improper, please let me know so I can fix it. Thank you, Judi