Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Christophe Jaffrelot without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christophe Jaffrelot. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christophe Jaffrelot was changed by JuchieG (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966234 on 2018-04-24T13:13:07+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Christophe Jaffrelot. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Please go to Talk:Christophe Jaffrelot and explain what you are trying to do. Otherwise, you are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

JuchieG, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi JuchieG! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  in the enhanced toolbar, or   if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Please read what you've been told. You are still posting unsigned messages. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disclosure of employment

edit

You mentioned at Wikipedia:Teahouse and at Talk:Christophe Jaffrelot that he is your boss. If you are being paid for your work with him, then it is mandatory to disclose this information per Wikipedia's terms of use and paid editing policy. What follows is the standard message regarding these policies. I will leave a similar message on your talk page at French Wikipedia.

 

Hello JuchieG. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Christophe Jaffrelot, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JuchieG. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JuchieG|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, JuchieG. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 00:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Christophe Jaffrelot

edit

Ok ‪David Biddulph JuchieG (talk) 10:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC) Juchie G JuchieG (talk) 10:06, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply