Fair Use in Australia discussion edit

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

{{nowrap|Hull Kingston Rovers}} edit

Hi Josh the newcastle fan, could I please ask a favour of you? You're correct, I'm using the Chrome browser, and the {{nowrap|Hull Kingston Rovers}} in the infobox does appear to cause the years of the Mickey Paea to wrap onto 2-lines. However, on other similar articles, e.g. Sam Smith (rugby league), {{nowrap|Hull Kingston Rovers}} doesn't appear to wrap the years. Would it be possible for you to have a quick look, to see why this might be the case? Best regards DynamoDegsy (talk) 15:55, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am unsure, it just started to happen out of the blue the last few months. Either way, I think we should be aiming for keeping the team names and years on one line as the priority. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 09:49, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of St Johns Eagles edit

 

The article St Johns Eagles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced page for an amateur club fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG as is.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 16:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Flags in European current templates edit

Hello there, I have been asked by another member of WPRL to widen the conversation on "Flags in European current templates", in the hope to gain a wider consensus. I imagine that this message may well never be read, dismissed, see me lose support, potentially gain some or take the discussion forwards. Please do take the time to read the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_league#Flags_in_squad_templates if you can, but the crux of my position is that the flags are prevalent elsewhere, are consistent with usage by the MOS, and their implementation for their rugby league national squad/team or representative nationality, is in line with their intended purpose. The crux of the remove side would be an IP editor may interpret a flag as indication of birth, give too much credence to the nation, and the decision was made previously. To remove them from all rugby league templates when there is a limited conversation would seem more than a little unfair I would say, hence the attempt to reach out. I'm quite happy to voted down, but would appreciate a few more voices to the discussion, else it would seem quite wrong to move from the majority into the minority.Fleets (talk) 19:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey Josh, do you mind adding your !vote to the above discussion - as the more voices we have the quicker we can (hopefully) get it resolved. Thanks, Mattlore (talk) 04:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Jack Johns edit

Hi Josh, after a search I decided Jack met the GNG requirements and so have started an article at Jack Johns (rugby league). Mattlore (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Josh the newcastle fan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Christian Crichton, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Anaxial (talk) 07:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Peter Malcolm edit

Hi, Josh. I just wanted to let you know that I moved the page that you created about Peter Malcolm to Peter Malcolm (rugby league), in order to disambiguate it from one I recently created about an American rugby union player of the same name. The wikilink on your user page now points to a disambiguation page. I would change the link myself, but I didn't want to step on any toes! All the best, ebbillings (talk) 15:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Politically correct words edit

I would just like to know, Is using words like "Dropped" and "Wooden Spoon" something that are too offensive to be used when editing?. I just notice whenever I put it in, people change it to either "replaced" or "last place" etc.

edit

Is it possible to get The North Sydney Bears logo re-uploaded back to it's wikipedia page. The logo I uploaded was there for months before a new user removed it and put another logo which was subsequently removed for copyright violations. I don't have a good enough computer to upload the logo again. I know you are good with editing etc so maybe you could help?.

Sully198787 (talk) 10:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Sully198787Sully198787 (talk) 10:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Josh the newcastle fan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Josh this might seem rude to ask you to edit something but I was notifying you since you go for the Knights that the coach of Newcastle is incorrect still on the List of current NRL coaches page it says Nathan Brown and it is now Kristian Woolf I struggle to edit these types of pages because I often stuff it up and I thought you would be a person who would like to do so. Personally I am a Knights supporter

Thank you Josh from 2001:8003:213C:2E00:ED72:BA07:5AB9:1298 (talk) 06:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

All good mate Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 07:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

RfC edit

Hello. Please take a look at this discussion. Thanks. Bionic (talk) 10:44, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

NQ PLayer list edit

I've reverted Electrifying once again and attempted to discuss on the talk page. If this isn't successful, I'll take it to the edit-warring noticeboard. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Newcastle Rugby League redirect" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Newcastle Rugby League redirect. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 19#Newcastle Rugby League redirect until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:39, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm Simon Peter Hughes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Katie Green (rugby league player), and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 07:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm Simon Peter Hughes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Emma Manzelmann, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 07:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Newcastle Knights Women edit

Hello Josh, Last week I created separate NRLW pages for three of the NRL clubs that have women's teams

Given your username, and creation of pages for multiple NRL and NRLW Knights players, I was wondering whether you would like to create a separate Newcastle Knights Women page?

Note, that I used the suffix 'Women' rather than {NRLW}' as several pages previously created for women's super league teams used this convention

Regards, John C. Moriarty (Nhoj1898)

Sorry for the late reply, yeah I can create that one. Will get around to it when I can. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 12:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sam Hoare (rugby league, born 1985) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Hoare (rugby league, born 1985) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Hoare (rugby league, born 1985) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

J Mo 101 (talk) 20:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

IP usage edit

Hi there. I recently noticed that you've been editing with an IP (beginning with 2001:8003:26D7:7800) in conjunction with your main account. While you aren't being disruptive, your actions may violate WP:LOUTSOCK. I'm not sure if it does, but if so, it could mean getting blocked. I'm just letting you know, you are not in trouble or anything, but you may want to stop using your IP and solely use your own account. If you know this does not violate anything, let me know and I'll understand. Thanks! interstatefive  02:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)   Further discussion: User_talk:Interstatefive § IP_usage interstatefive  22:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Newcastle Knights season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Armstrong. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Newcastle Rugby League edit

 Template:Newcastle Rugby League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Newcastle Rugby League redirect" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Newcastle Rugby League redirect has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 29 § Newcastle Rugby League redirect until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 20 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Newcastle Knights season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Armstrong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply