User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page80

original Historical progression of records

edit

Number of award (categories) each year

make a zebra stripe

select colors --- | style="background-color:#FFFF99 | .

calculate time --- {{Years ago|1959}} ............. 65 --- MAYORS --- see Talk Page for this Sand Box

fix sorting ability

re format the whole set up?

Template - Historical progression of records

re format ???

{{Years ago|1959}} ............. 65 ............

sorting ability

re arrange Template - Historical progression of records

zebra stripes

sorting ability

column width

CONFIRM accuracy !!!!!!!!!!!!!

zebra stripes

sorting ability

column width

double check links / also accuracy

zebra stripes

sorting ability

column width

double check links / also accuracy

zebra stripes - correct colors --- Periwinkle (color) ... color code ... #CCCCFF --- complementary color (light yellow) ... color code ... #FFFFCC

sorting ability

column width

double check links / also accuracy

cross check accuracy against the "real" chart

use of BOLD text

use of " BIG " text

rwo span colspan the 1st Awards Sunrise and 7th Heaven

Analogous Color Scheme

zebra stripes - correct colors --- Periwinkle (color) ... color code ... #CCCCFF --- analogous color (light periwinkle) ... color code ... #EDEDFF

col span and row span for ORIGINAL setting of record at 1st Awards

Article

edit

List of films with the most Academy Awards per ceremony

Historical progression of films receiving a record number of Academy Award nominations

edit
Record Number
of Nominations
Film Title Achievement Academy Awards Season Duration of
Record
Ceremony Year in Film
5 nominations 7th Heaven Set Record 1st 19271928 2 years
In Old Arizona Tied Record 2nd 19281929
The Patriot
6 nominations The Love Parade Broke Record 3rd 19291930 1 year
7 nominations Cimarron Broke Record 4th 19301931 4 years
8 nominations Mutiny on the Bounty Broke Record 8th 1935 2 years
10 nominations The Life of Emile Zola Broke Record 10th 1937 2 years
13 nominations Gone with the Wind Broke Record 12th 1939 11 years
14 nominations All About Eve Broke Record 23rd 1950 73 years
Titanic Tied Record 70th 1997
La La Land Tied Record 89th 2016

Historical progression of films receiving a record number of Academy Awards

edit
Record Number
of Awards
Film Title Achievement Academy Awards Season Duration of
Record
Ceremony Year in Film
3 awards 7th Heaven Set Record 1st 19271928 6 years
Sunrise
Cimarron Tied Record 4th 19301931
Cavalcade Tied Record 6th 19321933
5 awards It Happened One Night Broke Record 7th 1934 5 years
8 awards Gone with the Wind Broke Record 12th 1939 19 years
From Here to Eternity Tied Record 26th 1953
On the Waterfront Tied Record 27th 1954
9 awards Gigi Broke Record 31st 1958 1 year
11 awards Ben-Hur Broke Record 32nd 1959 64 years
Titanic Tied Record 70th 1997
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King Tied Record 76th 2003

List of films receiving the most Academy Awards---- organizing the TOTAL row at the BOTTOM

edit
Academy Awards Season Film Title Best Picture Awards Nominations Notes
Ceremony Year in Film Winner Nominee
32nd 1959 Ben-Hur 11 12
70th 1997 Titanic 11 14
76th 2003 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 11 11
3
Ceremonies
3
Years in Film
3
Film Titles
3
Winners
3
Nominees
33
Awards
37
Nominations
Column
Totals

List of films receiving the most Academy Awards

edit
Academy Awards Season Film Title Best Picture Awards Nominations Notes
Ceremony Year in Film Winner Nominee
32nd 1959 Ben-Hur 11 12
70th 1997 Titanic 11 14
76th 2003 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 11 11
3 Ceremonies 3 Years in Film 3 Film Titles 3 Winners 3 Nominees 33 Awards 37 Nominations Column
Totals

List of films receiving the most Academy Awards

edit
Academy Awards Season Film Title Best Picture Awards Nominations Notes
Ceremony Year in Film Winner Nominee
32nd 1959 Ben-Hur 11 12
70th 1997 Titanic 11 14
76th 2003 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 11 11

List of films receiving the most Academy Awards

edit
Academy Awards Season Film Title Best Picture Awards Nominations Notes
Ceremony Year in Film Winner Nominee
32nd 1959 Ben-Hur 11 12
70th 1997 Titanic 11 14
76th 2003 The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 11 11
Total 3 3 33 37 Column
Totals

Difference between "Best Picture" and "Unique Artistic" at FIRST ceremony

edit
edit

1st Academy Awards

Color websites

edit

[1] ... color combo

[2] ... shades nuancer - lighter / darker (French web site)

[3] ... how-to-select-perfectly-matching-color-combinations

[4] ... color calculator

[5] ... color code hex

[6] ... color hexa

[7] ... hex color

[8] ... color calculator

[9] ... color harmonies: Hulk wears purple pants

[10] ... color schemer

[11] ... flex color palette

[12] ... colour calculator

[13] ... color schemes

[14] ... newton

[15] ... color relationships creating color harmony

[16] ... color wizard

What is the proper format for the "line break" command?

edit

Can someone please explain to me the difference in the following three commands? What is each one supposed to do, or supposed to be used for? Thanks.

  • <br> (just the two letters "b" and "r")
  • </br> (the two letters with a slash/virgule before them)
  • <br/> (the two letters with a slash/virgule after them)

Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

The all do the same thing. (See here for a discussion.) RJFJR (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, what he said. I will only add that the second form is clearly malformed and shouldn't be used (MediaWiki knows that it's wrong but seems to do the right thing anyway).
Trappist the monk (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
WP:LINEBREAK says the preferred form is <br />. Omitting the slash has the additional downside that it breaks syntax highlighting. – Finnusertop (talkcontribs) 18:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Is there any difference between <br/> and <br />? The first one does not have a space between the letter "r" and the slash. The second one does have a space between the letter "r" and the slash. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
See WP:LINEBREAK. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
This goes back in HTML history a bit since <br> used to be the standard. Then came along an HTML standard that said all tags should have a closing /. To anyone not in the web design world, and even for some in that world, it's a pedantic difference. You can just use <br /> and not worry. Dismas|(talk) 01:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, all. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

<br />

List of elements

edit

List of elements - a table with the sort as a separate row

Audie Murphy honors and awards - the first row is the "title" of the chart

1990 NFL season - a "white" table with no borders

Sorting rows in a table: What does this code do?

edit

Please see this article: List of chemical elements. The relevant computer code in List of elements is as follows:


|-
!  
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
|-style="display:none;"
| −999 || !a || !a || !a || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999 || −999
|-

What is all that business with the -999 values and the !a notations? What does that do? What is that supposed to do? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Joseph A. Spadaro: Looks like it is (or was) to do with sorting, according to the diff. —  crh 23  (Talk) 16:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
(edit conflict)@Joseph A. Spadaro: See Help:Sorting#Forcing proper sort type and positioning rows with a hidden sort key - NQ (talk) 17:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. But, sorry, I still don't understand. I know that it has some relationship to the whole sorting process. Beyond that, I still don't understand what it is or what it's doing. Can someone clarify in plain English? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
The row is not displayed due to style="display:none;". It was added to control whether columns are sorted alphabetically or numerically so you can just ignore it if there are no sorting problems. "10" comes before "5" in alphabetic sorting because it compares one character at a time and "1" comes before "5". In numerical sorting "5" should come before "10". The table sorting software and how it determines sort method for a column has changed several times. I'm not sure the code is needed today but it seems harmless to leave it in. If it's removed then there may be a risk that a column with numbers will start sorting alphabetically. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. So, in other words: the columns with a -999 notation are telling the software to sort this column numerically; and the columns with a !a notation are telling the software to sort this column alphabetically. Is that what's happening? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that's basically what was happening but it's not the best or most reliable system with the current sorting software. TheDJ has used a better system in [17]. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:45, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
I changed this to use the more understandable methodology of using data-sort-type. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 06:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, all. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply