Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Joey80! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 13 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Tolgahan Sayisman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Ninibeth Leal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Corine Rottschäfer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Mirta Massa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Ilma Urrutia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Ernesto Calzadilla - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Rajeev Singh - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Karina Berger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Brett Wilson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Jason Erceg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Masterpieces of Intangible Heritage.png edit

Hi, you have updated this map in 2009, however I see a total mixup of the Baltic states. Estonia should be valued 3, Lithuania 2 and Latvia 1. It would be great if you could fix that. Thanks. --H2ppyme (talk) 19:15, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

That's because I didn't update the map. It is as of 2005, when the list is as of 2009. Maybe you could ask the editor who updated the list for 2009 to also do the same for the map. Joey80 (talk) 00:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Miss Globe International edit

I have nominated Miss Globe International, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Globe International. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Angel Clinton (talk) 05:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you please tell me how you can make a map like the one in Miss Universe? Thanks


Speedy deletion of Template:Pritzker Prize Winners 1979-2000 edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Pritzker Prize Winners 1979-2000 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Elekhh (talk) 07:05, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Miss International Pageant Map.PNG missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Miss International Pageant Map.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Globe Organisation for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Globe Organisation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Globe Organisation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. E4024 (talk) 20:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Infobox World Heritage Site has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Miss Universe editions for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Miss Universe editions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss Universe editions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 08:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Miss World hosts and invited artists for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Miss World hosts and invited artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Miss World hosts and invited artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 16:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Memory of the World Programme logo.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Memory of the World Programme logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lucia Liptáková edit

 

The article Lucia Liptáková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kristina Slavinskaya edit

 

The article Kristina Slavinskaya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jennifer Schooler edit

 

The article Jennifer Schooler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Maricar Balagtas edit

 

The article Maricar Balagtas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joan Chópite edit

 

The article Joan Chópite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karin Laasmäe edit

 

The article Karin Laasmäe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Minna Mäki-Kala edit

 

The article Minna Mäki-Kala has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 02:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Skye-Jilly Edwards edit

 

The article Skye-Jilly Edwards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yormery Ortega edit

 

The article Yormery Ortega has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Karina Berger edit

 

The article Karina Berger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yajaira Vera edit

 

The article Yajaira Vera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Thomas Sasse edit

 

The article Thomas Sasse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Albe Geldenhuys edit

 

The article Albe Geldenhuys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jason Erceg edit

 

The article Jason Erceg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Peter Eriksén edit

 

The article Peter Eriksén has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent third party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ernesto Calzadilla edit

 

The article Ernesto Calzadilla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Brett Wilson (model) edit

 

The article Brett Wilson (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rajeev Singh edit

 

The article Rajeev Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:54, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Tolgahan Sayışman edit

 

The article Tolgahan Sayışman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage to support the article and therefore not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of Miss Universe hosts and invited artists listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Miss Universe hosts and invited artists. Since you had some involvement with the List of Miss Universe hosts and invited artists redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Miss Universe Organization edit

 Template:Miss Universe Organization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 22:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply