Welcome

edit

Hello and welcome to WP. I noticed your edits and see you're mostly agree with your edits. I do have one objection: Red links are not errors. They are future articles and often the red link is the only indication that a new article is needed there. If there is no chance of something being a real article then I remove it but not otherwise. I am thinking especially of Almond scab, Fruit spot, and Yellow Sigatoka in this edit: Special:Diff/1063516310.

That's the only problem. Keep going. WP certainly needs more extensioners editing here. Invasive Spices (talk) 3 January 2022 (UTC)


Thank you Invasive Spices for pointing this out to me. I am new to WP and thought that red means the link is broken and should be removed, but your explanation makes sense. I will undo those edits. I appreciate you taking the time to explain this to me. I agree, there are many more ag extension edits that still need to be made in WP. Jimhue (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 18:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center

edit

  Hello, Jimhue. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center

edit
 

Hello, Jimhue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center has been accepted

edit
 
Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 00:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell E. Larson Agricultural Research Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  05:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Diplocarpon coronaria

edit

Thanks for the new article on Marssonina blotch. Might this better be merged to the long-standing stub at Diplocarpon coronaria? Both are very short, and merging would help with context. Klbrain (talk) 20:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

My opinion is that they should stay separate as they are two different (albeit closely related) topics. I was hoping to add to both articles over the next few months. However, I don't have a strong opinion on this. Jimhue (talk) 14:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply